Skip to main content
Original Article

Mind the Gap!

Unmet Time Schedules Predict University Students’ Negative Affect During the Examination Phase

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000218

Abstract. The goal of this study was to investigate the dynamic interplay of affect and time investment during exam preparation using daily learning diaries. University students (N = 56) reported a simultaneous increase in negative affect as well as intended and actual time investment over the course of the survey period (30 days). Cramming of study time partially accounted for the increase in negative affect. More planning strategies were associated with lower negative and more positive affect. Unmet time schedules predicted higher negative and lower positive affect. Results further revealed compensatory feedback loops: Higher negative affect in the evening predicted higher intended time investment on the next morning, but without improvements in planning strategies. Results suggest that unmet time schedules could contribute to the increase in negative affect during exam preparation. Interventions should promote students’ planning to reduce the difference between intended and actual time investment.


Verfehlte Zeitpläne sagen negativen Affekt Studierender während der Prüfungsphase vorher

Zusammenfassung. In der vorliegenden Studie wurde das dynamische Zusammenspiel zwischen Affekt und Zeitinvestment während der Prüfungsphase untersucht. Studierende (N = 56) füllten täglich Lerntagebücher aus und berichteten eine gleichzeitige Zunahme von negativem Affekt, geplantem Zeitinvestment und tatsächlicher Lernzeit über den Erhebungszeitraum (30 Tage). Der Anstieg des negativen Affekts konnte teilweise durch den Anstieg in der Lernzeit zu Semesterende erklärt werden. Bessere Planungsstrategien waren mit geringerem negativem und höherem positivem Affekt assoziiert. Verfehlte Zeitpläne sagten einen höheren negativen und geringeren positiven Affekt voraus. Die Ergebnisse zeigten zudem kompensatorische Feedbackschleifen: Negativer Affekt am Abend sagte ein höheres geplantes Zeitinvestment am nächsten Morgen vorher, jedoch ohne Verbesserungen der Planungsstrategien. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass verfehlte Zeitpläne zum Anstieg des negativen Affekts während der Prüfungsvorbereitung beitragen könnten. Interventionen sollten Planungsstrategien fördern, um Studierende darin zu unterstützen, die Differenz zwischen geplanter und echter Lernzeit zu reduzieren.

Literatur

  • Arend, M. G., & Schäfer, T. (2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24 (1), 1 – 19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bellhäuser, H., Lösch, T., Winter, C., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Applying a web-based training to foster self-regulated learning – effects of an intervention for large numbers of participants. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 87 – 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Böke, B. N., Mills, D. J., Mettler, J., & Heath, N. L. (2019). Stress and coping patterns of university students. Journal of College Student Development, 60 (1), 85 – 103. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4 (1), 3 – 22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. (2015). Control processes, priority management, and affective dynamics. Emotion Review, 7 (4), 301 – 307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590616 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135 (2), 183 – 204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006). Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. Academic Medicine, 81 (4), 354 – 373. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200604000-00009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goda, Y., Yamada, M., Kato, H., Matsuda, T., Saito, Y., & Miyagawa, H. (2015). Procrastination and other learning behavioral types in e-learning and their relationship with learning outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 72 – 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Stoeger, H., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 34 (1), 49 – 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9152-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, P., & Oettingen, G. (2011). Planning promotes goal striving. In K. D. VohsR. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 162 – 185). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Häfner, A., Stock, A., & Oberst, V. (2015). Decreasing students’ stress through time management training: an intervention study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30 (1), 81 – 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0229-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Häfner, A., Stock, A., Pinneker, L., & Ströhle, S. (2014). Stress prevention through a time management training intervention: an experimental study. Educational Psychology, 34 (3), 403 – 416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785065 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klingsieck, K. B. (2013). Procrastination when good things don’t come to thos who wait. European Psychologist, 18 (1), 24 – 34. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000138 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Leiner, D. J. (2019). SoSci Survey (Version 3.1.06) [Computer software]. Available at https://www.soscisurvey.de First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students’ time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60(October), 310 – 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lutz-Kopp, C., Meinhardt-Injac, B., & Luka-Krausgrill, U. (2019). Psychische Belastung Studierender. Prävention Und Gesundheitsförderung, 14 (3), 256 – 263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-018-0691-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McIntyre, K. M., Mogle, J. A., Scodes, J. M., Pavlicova, M., Shapiro, P. A., Gorenstein, E. E., Tager, F. A., Monk, C., Almeida, D. M., & Sloan, R. P. (2019). Anger-reduction treatment reduces negative affect reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87 (2), 141 – 150. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000359 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B.O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neubauer, A. B., Scott, S. B., Sliwinski, M. J., & Smyth, J. M. (2020). How was your day? Convergence of aggregated momentary and retrospective end-of-day affect ratings across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119 (1), 185 – 203. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000248 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18 (4), 315 – 341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37 (2), 91 – 105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). ERIC Institute of Educational Science, August, 76. https://doi.org/ED338122 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Roth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review of self-report instruments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28 (3), 225 – 250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schallberger, U. (2005). Kurzskalen zur Erfassung der Positiven Aktivierung, Negativen Aktivierung und Valenz in Experience Sampling Studien (PANAVA-KS). In U. Schallberger (Ed.), Forschungsberichte aus dem Projekt: “Qualität des Erlebens in Arbeit und Freizeit” (6th ed.). Zürich: Psychologisches Institut. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schilling, O. K., & Diehl, M. (2014). Reactivity to stressor pile-up in adulthood: Effects on daily negative and positive affect. Psychology and Aging, 29 (1), 72 – 83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035500 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, L. I., Scheiter, F., Neubauer, A., & Sieverding, M. (2019). Anforderungen, Entscheidungsfreiräume und Stress im Studium. Diagnostica, 65 (2), 63 – 74. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000213 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, B., & Perels, F. (2011). Self-monitoring of self-regulation during math homework behaviour using standardized diaries. Metacognition and Learning, 6 (3), 255 – 273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9076-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31 (1), 64 – 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.02.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shankland, R., Kotsou, I., Vallet, F., Bouteyre, E., Dantzer, C., & Leys, C. (2019). Burnout in university students: The mediating role of sense of coherence on the relationship between daily hassles and burnout. Higher Education, 78 (1), 91 – 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0332-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sieverding, M., Schmidt, L. I., Obergfell, J., & Scheiter, F. (2013). Stress und Studienzufriedenheit bei Bachelor- und Diplom- Psychologiestudierenden im Vergleich: Eine Erklärung durch Anwendung des Demand-Control-Modells. Psychologische Rundschau, 64 (2), 94 – 100. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000152 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stallman, H. M. (2010). Psychological distress in university students: A comparison with general population data. Australian Psychologist, 45 (4), 249 – 257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2010.482109 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133 (1), 65 – 94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steel, P., Brothen, T., & Wambach, C. (2001). Procrastination and personality, performance, and mood. Personality and Individual Differences, 30 (1), 95 – 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00013-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10 (4), 297 – 303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00157 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Theobald, M., Bellhäuser, H., & Imhof, M. (2018). Identifying individual differences using log-file analysis: Distributed learning as mediator between conscientiousness and exam grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 112 – 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wäschle, K., Allgaier, A., Lachner, A., Fink, S., & Nückles, M. (2014). Procrastination and self-efficacy: Tracing vicious and virtuous circles in self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 103 – 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063 – 1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96 (2), 234 – 254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.234 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wild, K.-P., & Schiefele, U. (1994). Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliablität eines neuen Fragebogens. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15 (4), 185 – 200. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41 (2), 64 – 70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar