Mind the Gap!
Unmet Time Schedules Predict University Students’ Negative Affect During the Examination Phase
Abstract
Abstract. The goal of this study was to investigate the dynamic interplay of affect and time investment during exam preparation using daily learning diaries. University students (N = 56) reported a simultaneous increase in negative affect as well as intended and actual time investment over the course of the survey period (30 days). Cramming of study time partially accounted for the increase in negative affect. More planning strategies were associated with lower negative and more positive affect. Unmet time schedules predicted higher negative and lower positive affect. Results further revealed compensatory feedback loops: Higher negative affect in the evening predicted higher intended time investment on the next morning, but without improvements in planning strategies. Results suggest that unmet time schedules could contribute to the increase in negative affect during exam preparation. Interventions should promote students’ planning to reduce the difference between intended and actual time investment.
Zusammenfassung. In der vorliegenden Studie wurde das dynamische Zusammenspiel zwischen Affekt und Zeitinvestment während der Prüfungsphase untersucht. Studierende (N = 56) füllten täglich Lerntagebücher aus und berichteten eine gleichzeitige Zunahme von negativem Affekt, geplantem Zeitinvestment und tatsächlicher Lernzeit über den Erhebungszeitraum (30 Tage). Der Anstieg des negativen Affekts konnte teilweise durch den Anstieg in der Lernzeit zu Semesterende erklärt werden. Bessere Planungsstrategien waren mit geringerem negativem und höherem positivem Affekt assoziiert. Verfehlte Zeitpläne sagten einen höheren negativen und geringeren positiven Affekt voraus. Die Ergebnisse zeigten zudem kompensatorische Feedbackschleifen: Negativer Affekt am Abend sagte ein höheres geplantes Zeitinvestment am nächsten Morgen vorher, jedoch ohne Verbesserungen der Planungsstrategien. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass verfehlte Zeitpläne zum Anstieg des negativen Affekts während der Prüfungsvorbereitung beitragen könnten. Interventionen sollten Planungsstrategien fördern, um Studierende darin zu unterstützen, die Differenz zwischen geplanter und echter Lernzeit zu reduzieren.
Literatur
2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24 (1), 1 – 19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195
(2016). Applying a web-based training to foster self-regulated learning – effects of an intervention for large numbers of participants. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 87 – 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.002
(2019). Stress and coping patterns of university students. Journal of College Student Development, 60 (1), 85 – 103. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0005
(2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4 (1), 3 – 22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.3
(2015). Control processes, priority management, and affective dynamics. Emotion Review, 7 (4), 301 – 307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590616
(2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135 (2), 183 – 204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965
(2006). Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. Academic Medicine, 81 (4), 354 – 373. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200604000-00009
(2015). Procrastination and other learning behavioral types in e-learning and their relationship with learning outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 72 – 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.001
(2010). Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 34 (1), 49 – 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9152-2
(2011).
(Planning promotes goal striving . In K. D. VohsR. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 162 – 185). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2015). Decreasing students’ stress through time management training: an intervention study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30 (1), 81 – 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0229-2
(2014). Stress prevention through a time management training intervention: an experimental study. Educational Psychology, 34 (3), 403 – 416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785065
(2013). Procrastination when good things don’t come to thos who wait. European Psychologist, 18 (1), 24 – 34. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000138
(2019). SoSci Survey (Version 3.1.06) [Computer software]. Available at https://www.soscisurvey.de
(2019). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students’ time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60(October), 310 – 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006
(2019). Psychische Belastung Studierender. Prävention Und Gesundheitsförderung, 14 (3), 256 – 263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-018-0691-9
(2019). Anger-reduction treatment reduces negative affect reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87 (2), 141 – 150. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000359
(2017). Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(2020). How was your day? Convergence of aggregated momentary and retrospective end-of-day affect ratings across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119 (1), 185 – 203. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000248
(2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18 (4), 315 – 341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
(2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37 (2), 91 – 105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
(1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). ERIC Institute of Educational Science, August, 76. https://doi.org/ED338122
(2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2016). Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review of self-report instruments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28 (3), 225 – 250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2
(2005).
(Kurzskalen zur Erfassung der Positiven Aktivierung, Negativen Aktivierung und Valenz in Experience Sampling Studien (PANAVA-KS) . In U. Schallberger (Ed.), Forschungsberichte aus dem Projekt: “Qualität des Erlebens in Arbeit und Freizeit” (6th ed.). Zürich: Psychologisches Institut.2014). Reactivity to stressor pile-up in adulthood: Effects on daily negative and positive affect. Psychology and Aging, 29 (1), 72 – 83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035500
(2019). Anforderungen, Entscheidungsfreiräume und Stress im Studium. Diagnostica, 65 (2), 63 – 74. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000213
(2011). Self-monitoring of self-regulation during math homework behaviour using standardized diaries. Metacognition and Learning, 6 (3), 255 – 273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9076-6
(2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31 (1), 64 – 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.02.002
(2019). Burnout in university students: The mediating role of sense of coherence on the relationship between daily hassles and burnout. Higher Education, 78 (1), 91 – 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0332-4
(2013). Stress und Studienzufriedenheit bei Bachelor- und Diplom- Psychologiestudierenden im Vergleich: Eine Erklärung durch Anwendung des Demand-Control-Modells. Psychologische Rundschau, 64 (2), 94 – 100. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000152
(2010). Psychological distress in university students: A comparison with general population data. Australian Psychologist, 45 (4), 249 – 257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2010.482109
(2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133 (1), 65 – 94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
(2001). Procrastination and personality, performance, and mood. Personality and Individual Differences, 30 (1), 95 – 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00013-1
(1999). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10 (4), 297 – 303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00157
(2018). Identifying individual differences using log-file analysis: Distributed learning as mediator between conscientiousness and exam grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 112 – 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.019
(2014). Procrastination and self-efficacy: Tracing vicious and virtuous circles in self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 103 – 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.005
(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063 – 1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
(1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96 (2), 234 – 254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.234
(1994). Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliablität eines neuen Fragebogens. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15 (4), 185 – 200.
(2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41 (2), 64 – 70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
(