Skip to main content
Freier Beitrag

Wie gut stimmen Eltern- und Kinderurteile bei der Einschätzung von Kinderängsten überein?

Eine Analyse mit dem Bereichsspezifischen Angstfragebogen für Kinder und Jugendliche (BAK)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0942-5403/a000258

Zusammenfassung. Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Studie soll die Interrater-Reliabilität des Eltern- und Kinderurteils für alle Skalen des Bereichsspezifischen Angstfragebogens für Kinder und Jugendliche (BAK) und der Einfluss von möglichen Variablen (Alter und Geschlecht des Kindes) auf die Übereinstimmung von Eltern- und Kindurteil ermittelt werden. Es wurden 572 Kinder und Jugendliche (295 Mädchen; 277 Jungen) im Alter von 9 bis 16 Jahren aus der Allgemeinbevölkerung und ihre Eltern anhand des BAK zu den Ängsten befragt. Berechnet wird die Interrater-Reliabilität sowohl für die intervallskalierten Daten (T-Werte) als auch für die daraus resultierenden kategorialen Daten. Es zeigt sich ausschließlich ein Alterseffekt auf die Übereinstimmung in den Punktwerten für die Skala Naturgewalten des BAK. Für alle Skalen des BAK mit Ausnahme der Skalen Medizinischer Bereich und Trennung/Unbekanntes konnte ein Geschlechtseffekt belegt werden. Die Interrater-Reliabilitäten sind als gering bis mittelmäßig einzustufen (ICC = .33 bis .62; Krippendorffs αü = .25 bis .57; Gewichtetes Cohens ϰ = .29 bis .58). Die Beurteiler-Übereinstimmungen fallen über alle Skalen hinweg bei den Mädchen höher aus als bei den Jungen. Die Ergebnisse verdeutlichen, dass es sinnvoll ist, bei der Beurteilung der Angstsymptomatik eines Kindes sowohl das Selbsturteil als auch das Elternurteil einzuholen.


Agreement Between Child and Parental Ratings of Anxiety Symptoms: An Analysis With the Area-Specific Anxiety Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (BAK)

Abstract. Child and parental ratings of children’s anxiety symptoms can be measured via the Area-Specific Anxiety Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (BAK). The first aim of the present study was to determine the interrater reliability for the agreement between child and parental ratings. Furthermore, the effects of the child’s age and gender on the agreement between parent and child ratings were analyzed. A community sample of 572 children and adolescents (295 girls, 277 boys) aged 9 – 16 years was collected. The BAK was used to detect anxiety symptoms of the children and adolescents. For all the children’s reports, there was also a rating of the child’s mother or father. Interrater reliability was calculated for the interval-scaled data (T values) as well as the resulting categorical data (five-level expression of anxiety from very low to very high). The results of the univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that there is only an age effect on the absolute difference in scores reported by children and parents for the scale forces of nature. However, a gender effect on the difference in scores was demonstrated for all scales of the BAK except the medical scale and the scale separation/anonymous. The ANOVAs indicated that the ratings of girls and parents do not differ as much as those of boys and parents do. For the child and parent version, reliability analysis yielded high internal consistencies (child: αc = .82–.95; parent: αc = .83–.95). The interrater reliabilities were low to moderate (ICC = .33–.62; Krippendorff’s αü = .25–.57; weighted Cohen’s κ = .29–.58). The interrater reliabilities corresponded to the results of the ANOVA: The coefficients were higher for the girl–parent agreement than for the boy–parent agreement. On average, the interrater reliability of the BAK lives up to its expectations. The deviations in agreements between different raters were also found in studies in which other anxiety measures were applied. In addition, for both groups of raters, the scales of the BAK proved to be highly reliable. This suggests that problems and conflicts are perceived differently by children and parents as signs of subjective anxiety and anxiety behaviors. Thus, it can be concluded that it is useful to obtain self-ratings as well as parental ratings of children’s or adolescents’ anxiety symptoms. With this approach, it is possible to judge the symptoms from different points of view and assess whether the degree of anxiety varies over different situations.

Literatur

  • Altman, D. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, E. M., Jensen-Doss, A., Kendall, P. C., Birmaher, B. & Ginsburg, G. S. (2016). All anxiety is not created equal: Correlates of parent/youth agreement vary across subtypes of anxiety. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 528 – 537. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beesdo-Baum, K. & Knappe, S. (2012). Developmental epidemiology of anxiety disorders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 21, 457 – 478. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Canavera, K. E., Wilkins, K. C., Pincus, D. B. & Ehrenreich-May, J. T. (2009). Parent–Child agreement in the assessment of absessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38, 909 – 915. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Choudhury, M. S., Pimentel, S. S. & Kendall, P. C. (2003). Childhood anxiety disorders: Parent–Child (Dis) agreement using a structured interview for the DSM-IV. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 957 – 964. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cosi, S., Canals, J., Hernandez-Martinez, C. & Vigil-Colet, A. (2010). Parent-child agreement in SCARED and its relationship to anxiety symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 129 – 133. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Essau, C. A., Lewinsohn, P. M., Olaya, B. & Seeley, J. R. (2014). Anxiety disorders in adolescents and psychosocial outcomes at age 30. Journal of Affective Disorders, 163, 125 – 132. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garcia-Lopez, L. J., Saez-Castillo, A. J., Beidel, D. & La Greca, A. M. (2015). Brief measures to screen for social anxiety in adolescents. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 36, 562 – 568. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grills, A. E. & Ollendick, T. H. (2003). Multiple Informant Agreement and the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Parents and Children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 30 – 40. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamblin, R. J., Salloum, A., Andel, R., Nadeau, J. M., McBride, N. M. & Lewin, A. B., et al. (2016). Predictors of parent-child agreement on child anxiety diagnoses on the ADIS-IV-C/P. Psychiatry Research, 245, 303 – 310. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jansen, M., Bodden, D. H. M., Muris, P., Doorn, M. van & Granic, I. (2017). Measuring anxiety in children: The importance of separate mother and father Reports. Child & Youth Care Forum, 46, 643 – 659. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klasen, F., Petermann, F., Meyrose, A.-K., Barkmann, C., Otto, C. & Haller, A.-C. et al. (2016). Verlauf psychischer Auffälligkeiten von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 25, 10 – 20. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Koo, T. K. & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15, 155 – 163. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lauth, B., Arnkelsson, G. B., Magnusson, P., Skarpheoinsson, G. A., Ferrari, P. & Petursson, H. (2010). Parent-youth agreement on symptoms and diagnosis: Assessment with a diagnostic interview in an adolescent inpatient clinical population. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 104, 315 – 322. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewin, A. B., Peris, T. S., De Nadai, A. S., McCracken, J. T. & Piacentini, J. (2012). Agreement between therapists, parents, patients, and independent evaluators on clinical improvement in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 1103 – 1107. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Looij-Jansen, P. M. van de, Jansen, W., Wilde, E. J. de, Donker, M. C. H. & Verhulst, F. C. (2010). Discrepancies between parent-child reports of internalizing problems among preadolescent children: Relationships with gender, ethnic background, and future internalizing problems. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 443 – 462. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mack, B. W. & Petermann, F. (2017). Bereichspezifischer Angstfragebogen für Kinder und Jugendliche. Bern: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, L. D., Martinez, Y. J., Shumka, E. & Baker, H. (2014). Multiple informant agreement of child, parent, and teacher ratings of child anxiety within community samples. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 59, 34 – 39. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nitkowski, D., Lohbeck, A., Petermann, U. & Petermann, F. (2017). Hat die Angstausprägung bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland von 1974 bis 2016 zugenommen? Eine Analyse des säkularen Trends von Angst über eine Zeitspanne von 42 Jahren. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 26, 110 – 117. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rappaport, B. I., Pagliaccio, D., Pine, D. S., Klein, D. N. & Jarcho, J. M. (2017). Discriminant validity, diagnostic utility, and parent-child agreement on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) in treatment- and non-treatment-seeking youth. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 51, 22 – 31. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Safford, S. M., Kendall, P. C., Flannery-Schroeder, E., Webb, A. & Sommer, H. (2005). A longitudinal look at parent–child diagnostic agreement in youth treated for anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34, 747 – 757. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scaini, S., Ogliari, A., De Carolis, L., Bellodi, L., Di Serio, C. & Brombin, C. (2017). Evaluation of mother-child agreement and factorial structures of the SCARED questionnaire in an Italian clinical sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Art. 242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00242 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, S. R. (2007). Making sense of multiple informants in child and adolescent psychopathology: A guide for clinicians. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 139 – 149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stevanovic, D., Jancic, J., Topalovic, M. & Tadic, I. (2012). Agreement between children and parents when reporting anxiety and depressive symptoms in pediatric epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior, 25, 141 – 144. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Storch, E. A., Ehrenreich May, J., Wood, J. J., Jones, A. M., De Nadai, A. S. & Lewin, A. B., et al. (2012). Multiple informant agreement on the anxiety disorders interview schedule in youth with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 22, 292 – 299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wieczerkowski, W., Nickel, H., Janowski, A., Fittkau, B., Rauer, W. & Petermann, F. (2016). Angstfragebogen für Schüler (7., neu normierte Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wirtz, M. & Kutschmann, M. (2007). Analyse der Beurteilerübereinstimmung für kategoriale Daten mittels Cohens Kappa und alternativer Maße. Die Rehabilitation, 46, 370 – 377. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar