Gemeinsamer Pornographiekonsum steht in positivem Zusammenhang mit sexueller Kommunikation
Abstract
Zusammenfassung.Theoretischer Hintergrund: Befunde zeigen, dass Pornographiekonsum innerhalb einer Partnerschaft im Zusammenhang steht mit sexueller Zufriedenheit. Bisher wurde aber kaum berücksichtigt, ob alleiniger oder gemeinsamer Konsum dabei ausschlaggebend sind und welche Bedeutung der sexuellen Kommunikation zukommt. Fragestellung: Diese Studie untersucht den Bezug der sexuellen Kommunikation zur sexuellen Zufriedenheit und die Rolle, die gemeinsamer versus alleiniger Pornographiekonsum dabei spielt. Methode: Es wurden in der Schweiz lebende 18- bis 60-jährige Männer und Frauen in einer mindestens einjährigen heterosexuellen Partnerschaft (N = 1091) mittels eines anonymen Online-Fragebogens befragt. Ergebnisse: Gemeinsam-Konsumierende kommunizieren besser miteinander über ihre Sexualität und sind sexuell signifikant zufriedener als die Allein-Konsumierenden. Schlussfolgerung: Der gemeinsame Pornographiekonsum ist im Vergleich zum alleinigen Konsum mit besserer sexueller Kommunikation assoziiert. Beide Variablen gehen mit einer höheren sexuellen und allgemeinen Partnerschaftszufriedenheit einher.
Abstract. Background: Findings show that the consumption of pornography is related to sexual satisfaction in a relationship. To date, however, it has seldom been taken into account whether sole or joint consumption is decisive and what role it plays in sexual communication. Objectives: This study examines the relationship between sexual communication and sexual satisfaction and the role that joint versus sole consumption of pornography plays. Methods: We surveyed 18- to 60-year-old men and women living in Switzerland who had been in a heterosexual relationship for at least one year (N = 1,091) using an anonymous online questionnaire. Results: Those who consume pornography together communicate better with one another about their sexuality and are significantly more sexually satisfied than those who consume it alone. Conclusions: Consuming pornography together is associated with better sexual communication compared to consuming it alone. Both variables are associated with higher sexual and general relationship satisfaction.
Literatur
2017). Does exposure to erotica reduce attraction and love for romantic partners in men? Independent replications of Kenrick, Gutierres, and Goldberg (1989) study 2. J Exp Soc Psychol, 70(C), 191 – 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.003
(2013). Was Paare stark macht (2. Auflage). Zürich: Beobachterverlag.
(2015). Desire and dilemma–gender differences in German students’ consumption of pornography. Porn Studies, 2 (1), 76 – 92. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2014.984923
(2021). Associations between pornography use frequency, pornography use motivations, and sexual wellbeing in couples. The Journal of Sex Research, 1 – 15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1893261
(2003). Romantic partners’ use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 29 (1), 1 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1080/713847097
(2011). Sexual media use and relational satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Personal Relationships, 18, 562 – 585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01328
(2021). Pornographiekonsum in der Partnerschaft: Häufigkeit, Motivation und Einstellung des Konsums und deren Geschlechtsunterschiede (Pornography consumption in intimate relationships: Frequency, motivation, and attitude towards consumption and their gender differences ). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 50 (1), 10 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000611
(2005). Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sexuality & Culture, 9(1), 28 – 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908761
(2005). Adolescents’ experience with sex on the web: Results from online focus groups. Journal of Adolescence, 28(4), 535 – 540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.10.006
(2013). Dyadic sexual communication scale. In Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 152 – 164). Routledge.
(2015). Guter Sex trotz Liebe. Wege aus der verkehrsberuhigten Zone (2. Auflage). Berlin: Ullstein.
(2009). Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples. Arch Sex Behav, 38(5), 746 – 753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9314-4
(2003). Patterns of masturbatory behaviour: Changes between the sixties and the nineties. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 14(2 – 3), 35 – 48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v14n02_04
(2015). Individual and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife couples: Dyadic analysis of the international survey of relationships. Arch Sex Behav, 44 (6), 1609 – 1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0426-8
(2017). What keeps passion alive? Sexual satisfaction is associated with sexual communication, mood setting, sexual variety, oral sex, orgasm, and sex frequency in a national US study. The Journal of Sex Research, 54 (2), 186 – 201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1137854
(2011). Perceived consequences of casual online sexual activities on heterosexual relationships: A U.S. online survey. Arch Sex Behav, 40 (2), 429 – 439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9598-z
(2013). Pornography, relationship alternatives, and intimate extradyadic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4 (6), 699 – 704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613480821
(2006). Gender differences in pornography consumption among young heterosexual danish adults. Arch Sex Behav, 35 (5), 577 – 585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9064-0
(2007). Pornography consumption: A study of prevalence rates, consumption patterns, and effects. Aarhus, Denmark: Psykologisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet.
(2008). Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Arch Sex Behav, 37 (4), 614 – 625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9212-1
(2020). The influence of collaborative pornography viewing on relationship quality in heterosexual couples. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 29 (3), 297 – 306. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJHS.2020-0028
(2021). Watching pornography alone or together: longitudinal associations with romantic relationship quality. J Sex Marital Ther, 47 (2), 130 – 146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1835760
(2014). Sexuality in the context of relationships. In APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 1: Person-based approaches (pp. 269 – 315). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14193-010
(1992). Deutsche Validierung des “Marital Satisfaction Inventory” (MSI) von Snyder (1981). System Familie, 5, 10 – 21.
(2021). But what’s your partner up to? Associations between relationship quality and pornography use depend on contextual patterns of use within the couple. Research Gate. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661347
(2017). perceived effects of pornography on the couple relationship: Initial findings of open-ended, participant-informed, “bottom-up” research. Arch Sex Behav, 46 (2), 585 – 602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0783-6
(2012). A love that doesn’t last: Pornography consumption and weakened commitment to one’s romantic partner. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31 (4), 410 – 438. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2012.31.4.410
(2015). Is Pornography use associated with sexual difficulties and dysfunctions among younger heterosexual men? The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12 (5), 1136 – 1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12853
(2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther, 31(5), 409 – 424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230591006719
(2011). Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: Associations with relationship quality. Arch Sex Behav, 40 (2), 441 – 448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4
(2013). The mediating role of sexual and nonsexual communication between relationship and sexual satisfaction in a sample of college-age heterosexual couples. J Sex Marital Ther, 39 (5), 410 – 427. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2011.644652
(2014). Pornography and sexual experiences among high school students in Sweden. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 35 (3), 179 – 188. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000034
(2020). Effects of pornography use and demographic parameters on sexual response during masturbation and partnered sex in women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093130
(2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Arch of Sex Behav, 45 (1), 85 – 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6
(2000). The impact of anonymity on responses to sensitive questions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30 (8), 1691 – 1708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02462.x
(2013). Pornography use: Who uses it and how it is associated with Couple Outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 50 (1), 72 – 83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.648027
(2015). How much more xxx is generation x consuming? Evidence of changing attitudes and behaviors related to pornography since 1973. Journal of Sex Research, 53 (1), 12 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.1003773
(2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
(2012). “lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48 (2), 1 – 36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
(2012). A review of internet pornography use research: methodology and content from the past 10 years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15 (1), 13 – 23. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0477
(1997). Manual for the Marital Satisfaction Inventory – Revised. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
(2012). Erotica viewing effects on intimate relationships and self/partner evaluations. Arch of Sex Behav, 42 (4), 615 – 624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0034-4
(2014). Korean men’s pornography use, their interest in extreme pornography, and dyadic sexual relationships. International Journal of Sexual Health, 27 (1), 16 – 35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2014.927048
(2006). Use of pornography in traditional media and on the internet in Norway. Journal of Sex Research, 43 (3), 245 – 254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552323
(2019). Self-perceived problematic pornography use: Beyond individual differences and religiosity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48 (2), 437 – 441. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10508-018-1292-6
(2011). Mental- and physical-health indicators and sexually explicit media use behavior by adults. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8 (3), 764 – 772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02030.x
(2016). Differences in pornography use among couples: Associations with satisfaction, stability, and relationship processes. Arch Sex Behav, 45 (1), 145 – 158.
(2020). Behind closed doors: Individual and joint pornography use among romantic couples. The Journal of Sex Research, 57 (1), 77 – 91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1541440
(2012). A longitudinal analysis of US adults’ pornography exposure. Journal of Media Psychology, 24 (2), 67 – 76. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000063
(2010). Exploring actor and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction among married couples. Social Science Research, 39 (5), 725 – 738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.09.002
(