Abstract
The present paper introduces a new variant of the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) called the Single Block IAT (SB-IAT). By eliminating the IATs block structure, the SB-IAT is argued to solve the structural problem of recoding in the IAT and accordingly, its contamination by method-specific variance. In Study 1, a flower-insect SB-IAT, a task-switching ability SB-IAT, and a geometry SB-IAT showed reduced, but still significant effects. Zero correlations between the three SB-IATs indicated a substantially reduced amount of method-specific variance. Study 2 examined the SB-IATs psychometric properties. A political attitude SB-IAT showed acceptable reliability, discriminated between liberal and conservative voters, and correlated with the corresponding attitude rating in the same magnitude as the standard IAT. Results indicate that the SB-IAT minimizes method-specific variance while retaining the IATs satisfying psychometric properties. The discussion focuses on potentials and constraints of this newly developed measure.
References
2005). Measuring task-switching ability in the Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 52, 167–179.
(2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad-model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487.
(2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77–85.
(2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 228–239.
(2007). Choice prediction with a balanced IAT. Unpublished manuscript, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg.
(2007). G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
(2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
(2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.
(2004). Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by redefining the category labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 357–365.
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
(in press ). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Inquisit 2.0.50401 [Computer software]. (2005). Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software LLC.
2005). Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the IAT effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 208–217.
(2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353–368.
(2002). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20, 483–510.
(1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.
(2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107–122.
(2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180–1192.
(2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–666.
(2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180.
(2006). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In , Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265–292). New York: Psychology Press.
(2004). Reducing the influence of extra-personal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667.
(1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.
(in press ). Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139–165.
(2008). Assessment of individual differences in implicit cognition: A review of IAT measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 210–217.
(1994). Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 318–341.
(2004). Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the extrinsic affective Simon task (EAST). European Journal of Personality, 18, 495–520.
(1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(2007). Paradigms we live by. A plea for more basic research on the IAT. In , Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 195–215). New York: Guilford.
(