Skip to main content
Original Articles

Minimizing Method-Specific Variance in the IAT

A Single Block IAT

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.237

The present paper introduces a new variant of the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) called the Single Block IAT (SB-IAT). By eliminating the IAT’s block structure, the SB-IAT is argued to solve the structural problem of recoding in the IAT and accordingly, its contamination by method-specific variance. In Study 1, a flower-insect SB-IAT, a task-switching ability SB-IAT, and a geometry SB-IAT showed reduced, but still significant effects. Zero correlations between the three SB-IATs indicated a substantially reduced amount of method-specific variance. Study 2 examined the SB-IAT’s psychometric properties. A political attitude SB-IAT showed acceptable reliability, discriminated between liberal and conservative voters, and correlated with the corresponding attitude rating in the same magnitude as the standard IAT. Results indicate that the SB-IAT minimizes method-specific variance while retaining the IAT’s satisfying psychometric properties. The discussion focuses on potentials and constraints of this newly developed measure.

References

  • Back, M.D. , Schmukle, S.C. , Egloff, B. (2005). Measuring task-switching ability in the Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 52, 167–179. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Conrey, F.R. , Sherman, J.W. , Gawronski, B. , Hugenberg, K. , Groom, C. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad-model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77–85. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. , Geldof, T. , De Bruycker, E. (2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 228–239. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eichstaedt, J. (2007). Choice prediction with a balanced IAT. Unpublished manuscript, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F. , Erdfelder, E. , Lang, A.-G. , Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R.H. , Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Bodenhausen, G.V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Govan, C.L. , Williams, K.D. (2004). Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by redefining the category labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 357–365. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G. , McGhee, D.E. , Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G. , Nosek, B.A. , Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G. , Poehlman, T.A. , Uhlmann, E. , Banaji, M.R. (in press). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Inquisit 2.0.50401 [Computer software]. (2005). Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software LLC. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K.C. , Mierke, J. (2005). Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the IAT effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 208–217. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K.C. , Voss, A. , Schmitz, F. , Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353–368. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, S.G. , Crouch, Z. (2002). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20, 483–510. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mierke, J. , Klauer, K.C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107–122. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Mierke, J. , Klauer, K.C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180–1192. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B.A. , Banaji, M.R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–666. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B.A. , Greenwald, A.G. , Banaji, M.R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B.A. , Greenwald, A.G. , Banaji, M.R. (2006). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J.A. Bargh, (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265–292). New York: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Olson, M.A. , Fazio, R.H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extra-personal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rogers, R. , Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothermund, K. , Teige-Mocigemba, S. , Gast, A. , Wentura, D. (in press). Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rothermund, K. , Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139–165. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schnabel, K. , Asendorpf, J.B. , Greenwald, A.G. (2008). Assessment of individual differences in implicit cognition: A review of IAT measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 210–217. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Strayer, D.L. , Kramer, A.F. (1994). Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 318–341. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teige, S. , Schnabel, K. , Banse, R. , Asendorpf, J.B. (2004). Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the extrinsic affective Simon task (EAST). European Journal of Personality, 18, 495–520. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wentura, D. , Rothermund, K. (2007). Paradigms we live by. A plea for more basic research on the IAT. In B. Wittenbrink, N. Schwarz, (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 195–215). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar