Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Self-Efficacy in Regulating Positive and Negative Emotions

A Validation Study in Germany

Published Online:January 01, 2013https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000151

Abstract

Perceived self-efficacy in emotion regulation facilitates various aspects of psychosocial adjustment. The Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy scale (RESE) by Caprara and Gerbino (2001) measures perceived capabilities to express positive emotions (POS) and to manage negative emotions, namely, despondency/distress (DES) and anger/irritation (ANG). The present research investigated the validity of the RESE scale in Germany. Study 1 investigated the factor structure and convergent validity of the scale in a sample of university students. In order to test the generalizability of findings from Study 1, in Study 2 we studied the factor structure, cross-gender invariance, and convergent validity of a slightly revised version of the scale in a sample of parents. The previously found factor structure was successfully replicated in both samples. Partial invariance on the scalar level was confirmed across gender. All self-efficacy subscales were positively correlated with life satisfaction and with reappraisal (a cognitive emotion regulation strategy). Suppression, a strategy of regulating emotional expression, was negatively related to POS. Findings suggest that the RESE scale is a valid instrument to assess emotion regulation self-efficacy in German-speaking samples.

References

  • Abler, B., & Kessler, H. (2009). Emotion Regulation Questionnaire – Eine deutschsprachige Fassung des ERQ von Gross und John [Emotion Regulation Questionnaire – A German version of the ERQ by Gross and John]. Diagnostica, 55, 144–152. doi 10.1026/0012–1924.55.3.144 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen,, S. J. J., (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi 10.1177/0049124192021002005 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V., Di Giunta, L., Eisenberg, N., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C., Tramontano, C. (2008). Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries. Psychological Assessment, 20, 227–237. doi 10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.227 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V., Di Giunta, L., Pastorelli, C., & Eisenberg, N. (2011). Mastery of negative affect: The hierarchical structure of self-efficacy beliefs related to discrete negative emotions. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V., & Gerbino, M. (2001). Autoefficacia Emotiva Percepita: La capacità di regolare l’affetività negative e di esprimere quella positive [Affective perceived self-efficacy: The perceived capacity to regulate negative affect and to express positive affect]. In G. V. Caprara, (Ed.), La valutazione dell’autoefficacia (pp. 35–50). Trento, Italy: Edizioni Erickson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G., & Steca, P. (2005). Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of prosocial behavior conductive to life satisfaction across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 191–217. doi 10.1521/jscp.24.2.191.62271 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471–492. doi 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Davidov, M., & Grusec, J. E. (2006). Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes. Child Development, 77, 44–58. doi 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00855.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Reiser, M., ... Guthrie, I. K. (2001). The relations of regulation and emotionality to children’s externalizing and internalizing problem behavior. Child Development, 72, 1112–1134. doi 10.1111/1467-8624.00337 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158–164. doi 10.1037/0022–3514.88.1.158 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gross, J. J., Richards, J. M., & John, O. P. (2006). Emotion regulation in everyday life. In D. K. Snyder,, J. Simpson,, & J. N. N., (Eds.), Emotion regulation in couples and families: Pathways to dysfunction and health (pp. 13–35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi 10.1037/11468-001037/11468-001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • IBM SPSS Statistics . (2010). SPSS Statistics version 19.0 [Computer software]. Somers, NY: IBM Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Knight, G. P., Guthrie, I. K., Page, M. C., & Fabes, R. A. (2002). Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 366–393. doi 10. 1002/ab.80011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, P. L. (1995). The emotion probe. American Psychologist, 50, 372–385. doi 10.1037//0003-066X.50.5.372 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2009). Mplus (Version 5.21) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Authors. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Aldao, A. (2011). Gender and age differences in emotion-regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 704–708. doi 10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • O’Boyle, E. H., & Williams, L. J. (2011). Decomposing model fit: Measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1–12. doi 10.1037/a0020539 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172. doi 10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In R. D. H. Heijmans,, D. S. G. Pollock, & A. Satorra, (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis: A Festschrift for Heinz Neudecker (pp. 233–247). London: Kluwer. doi 10.2139/ssrn.189431 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sölva, M., Baumann, U., & Lettner, K. (1995). Wohlbefinden: Definitionen, Operationalisierungen, empirische Befunde [Well-being: Definitions, operationalizations, empirical results]. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 3, 292–309. doi 10.1024/1421-0185/a000003 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sontag, L. M., & Graber, J. A. (2010). Coping with perceived peer stress: Gender-specific and common pathways to symptoms of psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1605–1620. doi 10.1037/a0020617 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steenkamp, J. E. N., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90. doi 10.1086/209528 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 2–30. doi 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trommsdorff, G., & Rothbaum, F. (2008). Development of emotion regulation in cultural context. In M. Vandekerckhove,, C. v. Scheve,, S. Ismer,, S. Jung,, & S. Kronast, (Eds.), Regulating emotions: Culture, social necessity, and biological inheritance (pp. 85–120). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi 10.1002/ 9781444301786.ch4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 139–158. doi 10.1177/1094428102005002001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar