Abstract
Abstract. The “digit span backwards” (DSB) is the most commonly used test in clinical neuropsychology to assess working memory capacity. Yet, it remains unclear how the task is solved cognitively. The present study was conducted to examine the use of visual and verbal cognitive strategies in the DSB. Further, the relationship between the DSB and a complex span task, based on the Simultaneous Storage and Processing task (Oberauer et al., 2003), was investigated. Visualizers performed better than verbalizers in the dual task condition (rPB = .23) only when the relevant digits were presented optically. Performance in the DSB correlated only weakly with the complex span task in all conditions (all τ ≤ .21). The results indicate that the processing modality is determined by the preference for a cognitive strategy rather than the presentation modality and suggest that the DSB measures different working aspects than commonly used experimental working memory tasks.
References
2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.
(1974). Working memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89.
(1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social Psychology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2010). Backward recall and benchmark effects of working memory. Memory & Cognition, 38, 279–291.
(1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210.
(2004). On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: Separating input and output factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 639.
(2004). Modality effects in verbal working memory: Differential prefrontal and parietal responses to auditory and visual stimuli. NeuroImage, 21, 340–351.
(1990). Effects of reversing digits forward and digits backward and strategy use on digit span performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 22–33.
(1982). How long does the modality effect persist. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 343–346.
(1988). Abilities involved in performance on competing tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 35–49.
(2000). Visuospatial imagery is a fruitful strategy for the digit span backward task: A study with near-infrared optical tomography. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 339–342.
(2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 6829–6833.
(2007). Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 615–622.
(2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.
(1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity. Intelligence, 14, 389–433.
(2008). Working memory plasticity in old age: Practice gain, transfer, and maintenance. Psychology and Aging, 23, 731–742.
(2000). Working memory capacity – facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045.
(2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167–193.
(2005). N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 46–59. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20131
(1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
(1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 45, 255.
(1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17, 398–422.
(1995). Separate digits tests: A brief history, a literature review, and a reexamination of the factor structure of the Test of Memory and Learning (TOMAL). Neuropsychology Review, 5, 151–171.
(1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17, 5–27.
(2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 164–171.
(1991). Cognitive styles – an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193–215.
(1991). Mediation of adult age differences in cognition by reductions in working memory and speed of processing. Psychological Science, 2, 179–183.
(1996). PET evidence for an amodal verbal working memory system. NeuroImage, 3, 79–88.
, (2006). Cross-modal processing in auditory and visual working memory. NeuroImage, 29, 853–858.
(2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Technical and interpretive manual, (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
(