Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000243

Abstract. Five studies were conducted to develop a short form of the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) questionnaire with optimal psychometric properties. Study 1 involved Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses of the responses of 2,066 adults, resulting in a 12-item form of the ECR containing the most discriminating items. The psychometric properties of the ECR-12 were further demonstrated in two longitudinal studies of community samples of couples (Studies 2 and 3), in a sample of individuals in same-sex relationships (Study 4), and with couples seeking therapy (Study 5). The psychometric properties of the ECR-12 are as good as those of the original ECR and superior to those of an existing short form. The ECR-12 can confidently be used by researchers and mental health practitioners when a short measure of attachment anxiety and avoidance is required.

References

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. M., Waters, E. & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alonso-Arbiol, I., Balluerka, N. & Shaver, P. R. (2007). A Spanish version of the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) adult attachment questionnaire. Personal Relationships, 14, 45–63. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arbuckle, J. (1999). AMOS 4.0 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L. & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. SimpsonW. S. RholesEds., Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cameron, J., Finnegan, H. & Morry, M. (2012). Orthogonal dreams in an oblique world: A meta-analysis of the association between attachment anxiety and avoidance. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 472–476. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collins, N. L. & Allard, L. M. (2001). Cognitive representations of attachment: The content and function of working models. In G. J. O. FletcherM. S. ClarkEds., Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Interpersonal processes (pp. 60–85). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Conradi, H. J., Gerlsma, C., van Duijn, M. & de Jonge, P. (2006). Internal and external validity of the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire in an American and two Dutch samples. European Journal of Psychiatry, 20, 258–269. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex Differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 193–214. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fairchild, A. & Finney, S. J. (2006). Investigating validity evidence for the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 116–135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G. & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ilfeld, F. W. (1976). Further validation of a psychiatric symptom in a normal population. Psychological Reports, 39, 1215–1228. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lafontaine, M.-F. & Lussier, Y. (2003). Bidimensional structure of attachment in love: Anxiety over abandonment and avoidance of intimacy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 35, 56–60. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G. & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacDonald, P. L. & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). A Monte Carlo simulation of item and person statistics based on item response theory and classical test theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 921–943. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mallinckrodt, B. & Wang, C. (2004). Quantitative methods for verifying semantic equivalence of translated research instruments: A Chinese version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 368–379. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J. R. & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–230. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matte, M., Lemieux, A. & Lafontaine, M.-F. (2009). Brief report: Factor structure of the Experiences in Close Relationships with gay and lesbian individuals. North American Journal of Psychology, 11, 361–368. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mikulincer, M. & Florian, V. (2000). Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience: Does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 260–273. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mooney, C. & Duval, R. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nakao, T. & Kato, K. (2004). Constructing the Japanese version of the Adult Attachment Style Scale (ECR). Japanese Journal of Psychology, 75, 154–159. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Picardi, A., Bitetti, D., Puddu, P. & Pasquini, P. (2000). Development and validation of an Italian version of the questionnaire “Experiences in Close Relationships,” a new self-report measure of adult attachment. Rivista di Psichiatria, 35, 114–120. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Poitras, S.-C., Guay, F. & Ratelle, C. F. (2012). Using the self-directed search in research: Selecting a representative pool of items to measure vocational interests. Journal of Career Development, 39, 186–207. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramsay, J. O. (2000). TestGraf: A program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data, Unpublished manuscript, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reeve, B. B. & Fayers, P. (2005). Applying item response theory modelling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. In P. FayersR. D. HaysEds., Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: Methods and practice (2nd ed., pp. 55–73). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M. & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sabourin, S., Valois, P. & Lussier, Y. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17, 15–27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34, 1–97. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der LindenR. K. HambletonEds., Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sibley, C. G., Fischer, R. & Liu, J. H. (2005). Reliability and validity of the revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1524–1536. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stroud, M. W., McKnight, P. E. & Jensen, M. P. (2004). Assessment of self-reported physical activity in patients with chronic pain: Development of an abbreviated Roland-Morris disability scale. The Journal of Pain, 5, 257–263. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thissen, D. & Steinberg, L. (1997). A response model for multiple choice items. In W. J. van der LindenR. K. HambletonEds., Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 381–394). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Valois, P., Houssemand, C., Germain, S. & Abdous, B. (2011). An open source tool to verify the psychometric properties of an evaluation instrument. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 552–556. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B. & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) Scale-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar