Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Psychometric Properties of a Brief Version of the Systemizing Quotient

Published Online:August 28, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000283

Abstract

Abstract. The construct of systemizing – the drive to construct or understand systems – has an important role in the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism. While a brief version of the Systemizing Quotient (SQ) has been proposed, there is a need to assess its psychometric properties. This study assessed factorial and construct validity of an 8-item version of the SQ on a sample of 627 participants. A single-factor latent variable model with a single correlated error term showed adequate fit in a confirmatory factor analysis. This model also demonstrated metric invariance across genders when controlling for an effect of age on item responses. Reliability was acceptable, α = .72. As further evidence for construct validity, SQ scores showed expected relationships with mental rotation performance, trait anxiety, childhood extroversion, childhood agreeableness, and gender. Overall, the results indicated good psychometric properties for the brief version of the SQ, suggesting that this scale could be useful when researchers require a systemizing measure that is minimally burdensome to complete.

References

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248–254. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01904-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., Gurunathan, N. & Wheelwright, S. (2003). The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 361–374. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1206 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buuren, S. & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v45/i03/ First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cook, C. M. & Saucier, D. M. (2010). Mental rotation, targeting ability and Baron-Cohen’s empathizing-systemizing theory of sex differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 712–716. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R. & Gough, H. G. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44, S78–S94. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ling, J., Burton, T. C., Salt, J. L. & Muncer, S. J. (2009). Psychometric analysis of the systemizing quotient (SQ) scale. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 539–552. doi: 10.1348/000712608X368261 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E. & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4, 73–79. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Manning, J. T., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. & Fink, B. (2010). Is digit ratio (2D:4D) related to systemizing and empathizing? Evidence from direct finger measurements reported in the BBC internet survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 767–771. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.030 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morsanyi, K., Primi, C., Handley, S. J., Chiesi, F. & Galli, S. (2012). Are systemizing and autistic traits related to talent and interest in mathematics and engineering? Testing some of the central claims of the empathizing-systemizing theory. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 472–496. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02089.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nettle, D. (2007). Empathizing and systemizing: What are they, and what do they contribute to our understanding of psychological sex differences? British Journal of Psychology, 98, 237–255. doi: 10.1348/000712606X117612 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pingault, J.-B., Pouga, L., Grèzes, J. & Berthoz, S. (2012). Determination of emotional endophenotypes: A validation of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales and further perspectives. Psychological Assessment, 24, 375–385. doi: 10.1037/a0025692 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., Schoemann, A., Rosseel, Y., Quick, C., Garnier-Villarreal, M. & Selig, J. (2013). semTools (Version 0.4-0), Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/semTools/index.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Preston, C. C. & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2013). lavaan: Latent variable analysis (Version 0.5-14). Retrieved from http://lavaan.ugent.be/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Samson, A. C. & Huber, O. W. (2010). Short German versions of empathizing and systemizing self-assessment scales. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 239–244. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000028 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Taylor, J. A. (1953). A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 48, 285–290. doi: 10.1037/h0056264 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg, S. G. & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–601. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Veale, J. F., Clarke, D. E. & Lomax, T. C. (2010). Biological and psychosocial correlates of adult gender-variant identities: New findings. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 252–257. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.045 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. doi: 10.1007/BF02293557 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., … Weil, L. (2006). Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 929–940. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.017 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wheelwright, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., Smith, R., … Wakabayashi, A. (2006). Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) and Empathy Quotient (EQ). Brain Research, 1079, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar