Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Psychometric Properties and Validation of a German High Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000411

Abstract. High sensitivity is an individual disposition to perceive and process external and internal stimuli more intensely than the average population. For measuring high sensitivity, Aron and Aron (1997) developed a unidimensional self-report questionnaire. However, Smolewska, McCabe, and Woody (2006) fitted a model with three correlated factors: ease of excitation, aesthetic sensitivity, and low sensory threshold. Both models were questioned by Evans and Rothbart (2008) who postulated a two-factor structure: negative affect and orienting sensitivity. Nonetheless, the studies presented so far are based on small samples and did not address the issues of the ordinal data and measurement invariance. We presented the first study that compared all postulated models, thereby taking the ordinal data into account, and evaluated the measurement invariance. We adopted the High Sensitive Person (HSP)-Scale for German-speaking populations and found that a three-factor model provided the best fit. However, we excluded 13 items because of their low factor loadings or high intercorrelations. The revised HSP-Scale fit a three-factor model. Furthermore, we could establish a high level of measurement invariance (strict invariance), indicating equality of loadings, thresholds, and residual variances across sex. The scale showed good psychometric properties and high test-retest reliability. Finally, relationships with psychological symptoms were presented.

References

  • Ahadi, B., & Basharpoor, S. (2010). Relationship between sensory processing sensitivity, personality dimensions and mental health. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 570–574. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq028 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 345–368. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aron, E., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 262–282. doi: 10.1177/1088868311434213 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benham, G. (2006). The highly sensitive person: Stress and physical symptom reports. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1433–1440. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.021 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blach, C., & Egger, J. W. (2011). “Hochsensible Persönlichkeit” – Bericht zum Forschungsprojekt Hochsensibilität [“The highly sensitive personality” – Report to research project high sensitivity]. Psychological Medicine, 22, 59–63. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blach, C., & Egger, J. W. (2014). Highly sensitive persons – An empirical investigation to a complex phenomenon. Psychological Medicine, 25, 4–16. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL. Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cheek, J. M., Bourgeois, M. L., Theran, S. A., Grimes, J. O., & Norem, J. K. (2009, February). Interpreting the factors of the Highly Sensitive Person scale. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Tampa, FL. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The brief symptom inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700048017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2008). Temperamental sensitivity: Two constructs or one? Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Evers, A., Rasche, J., & Schabracq, M. J. (2008). High sensory-processing sensitivity at work. International Journal of Stress Management, 15, 189–198. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.15.2.189 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Franke, G. H. (2000). BSI. Brief Symptom Inventory – Deutsche version. Manual [Brief Symptom Inventory – German version. Manual]. Göttingen, Germany: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Franke, G. H. (2017). BSCL. Brief Symptom Checklist, manual. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Franke, G. H., Stenzel, S., Rank, C., Herbold, D., & Küch, D. (2015). Die Brief Symptom Checklist (BSCL) im Einsatz bei Patientinnen und Patienten der orthopädischen Rehabilitation [The Brief Symptom Checklist (BSCL) in use with female and male patients in the orthopedic rehabilitation] Berlin, Germany: Jahrestagung des AK Klinische Psychologie. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281833605_Die_Brief_Symptom_Checklist_%28BSCL%29_im_Einsatz_bei_Patientinnen_und_Patienten_der_orthopaedischen_Rehabilitation First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. The American Psychologist, 59, 93–104. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, S. G., & Bitran, S. (2007). Sensory-processing sensitivity in social anxiety disorder: Relationship to harm avoidance and diagnostic subtypes. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 944–954. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kagan, J., Snidman, N., Arcus, D., & Reznick, J. S. (1994). Galen’s prophecy: Temperament in human nature. New York, NY: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Liss, M., Mailloux, J., & Erchull, M. J. (2008). The relationship between sensory processing sensitivity, alexithymia, autism, depression, and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 255–259. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, B., Ajchenbrenner, M., & Bowles, D. P. (2005). Sensory sensitivity, attachment experiences, and rejection responses among adults with borderline and avoidant features. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 641–658. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.6.641 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neal, J. A., Edelmann, R. J., & Glachan, M. (2002). Behavioural inhibition and symptoms of anxiety and depression: Is there a specific relationship with social phobia? The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 361–374. doi: 10.1348/014466502760387489 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi: 10.1007/BF02296192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smolewska, K. A., McCabe, S. B., & Woody, E. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five”. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1269–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thielsch, M. T. (2008). Ästhetik von Websites. Wahrnehmung von Ästhetik und deren Beziehung zu Inhalt, Usability und Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen [Aesthetics of websites. Perception of aesthetics and their relation to content, usability and personality traits]. Münster, Germany: MV Wissenschaft. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar