Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Assessing Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulation of Academic Writing

Development and Validation of a Scale

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000452

Abstract. Academic writing is a complex and demanding activity that plays an important role in self-regulated learning settings within higher education. Self-efficacy and self-regulation are crucial factors for success and failure in academic writing. Because of the lack of adequate instruments, assessment of these factors is still limited. This paper introduces a scale for the assessment of self-efficacy for self-regulation of academic writing (SSAW). We deductively developed the SSAW scale and then conducted three studies in order to test and validate the scale. The first study (N = 121) resulted in a brief scale with good psychometric properties. The second study (N = 660) showed the scale’s factorial validity. The third study (N = 188) provided evidence for the convergent validity of the SSAW scale. In sum, these studies yield a reliable, valid, and economic scale. The results are discussed with regard to the usefulness of the SSAW scale for research and practice in higher education.

References

  • Abele-Brehm, A. E. & Stief, M. (2004). Predicting career success of university graduates: Findings of the first and second wave of the Erlangen longitudinal study BELA-E. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 48, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.48.1.4 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). Amos (Version 21.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago, IL: SPSS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. PajaresT. UrdanEds., Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–338). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bangert-Drowns, R., Hurley, M. & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bensberg, G. & Messer, J. (2011). Was tun bei Schreibproblemen? [How to cope with writing difficulties?]. In G. BensbergJ. MesserEds., Survivalguide Bachelor [Survival guide bachelor] (pp. 227–244). Berlin, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boice, R. (1989). Procrastination, busyness and bingeing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 275, 605–611. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bortz, J. & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (4., überarbeitete Aufl.) [Research methods and evaluation for human and social scientists (4th rev. ed.)]. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bruning, R. & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35, 25–37. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion (2., aktualisierte und erweiterte Aufl.) [Introduction to constructing tests and questionnaires (2nd rev. ed.)]. München, Germany: Pearson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V., Di Giunta, L., Eisenberg, N., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C. & Tramontano, C. (2008). Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries. Psychological Assessment, 20, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.227 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Danner, D., Blasius, J., Breyer, B., Eifler, S., Menold, N., Paulhus, D. L., … Ziegler, M. (2016). Current challenges, new developments, and future directions in scale construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000375 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, A. H. T., Figueredo, A. J., Fahy, B. F. & Rawiworrakul, T. (2007). Reliability and validity of the exercise self-regulatory efficacy scale for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Heart and Lung, 36, 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.08.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dittmann, J., Geneuss, K. A., Nennstiel, C. & Quast, N. A. (2003). Schreibprobleme im Studium – Eine empirische Untersuchung [Writing difficulties in academic studies]. In K. EhlichA. SteetsEds., Wissenschaftlich schreiben – lehren und lernen [Academic writing – teaching and learning] (pp. 155–185). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122–128. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fritzsche, B. A., Young, B. R. & Hickson, K. C. (2003). Individual differences in academic procrastination tendency and writing success. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1549–1557. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Golombek, C., Klingsieck, K. B., Sennewald, N. & Scherer, C. (2016, July). Using self-assessment for evaluating the effects of writing interventions in higher education. Implications and limitations derived from a pilot study. Paper presented at the Conference on Writing Research (COWR), Liverpool, UK First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, S. & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hackett, G. (1995). Self-efficacy in career choice and development. In A. BanduraEd., Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 232–258). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29, 369–388. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. GreggE. R. SteinbergEds., Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hidi, S. & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing. In C. A. MacArthurS. GrahamJ. FitzgeraldEds., Handbook of writing research (pp. 144–157). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, H. F. & Rice, J. (1974). Little jiffy, mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, P. D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203–270. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruse, O. (2007). Wissenschaftliches Schreiben und studentisches Lernen [Academic writing and student learning]. Dossier der Arbeitsstelle für Hochschuldidaktik. Zürich, Switzerland: Universität Zürich. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landmann, M., Perels, F., Otto, B. & Schmitz, B. (2009). Selbstregulation [Self-regulation]. In E. WildJ. MöllerEds., Pädagogische Psychologie [Educational psychology] (pp. 49–70). Berlin, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ledesma, R. D. & Valero-Moda, P. (2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12, 1–11. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lienert, G. A. & Raatz, U. (1998). Testaufbau und Testanalyse (6. Aufl.) [Test construction and test analysis (6th ed.)]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G. & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K. & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R. & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nückles, M., Hübner, S. & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259–271. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pajares, F. (2010). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19, 139–158. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pajares, F., Valiante, G. & Cheong, Y. F. (2007). Writing self-efficacy and its relation to gender, writing motivation and writing competence: A developmental perspective. In S. HidiP. BoscoloEds., Writing and motivation (pp. 141–159). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Prior, P. & Bilbro, R. (2012). Academic enculturation: Developing literate practices and disciplinary identities. In M. CastellóC. DonahueEds., University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 19–31). Bingley, UK: Emerald. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. (2000). Streß, Angst und Handlungsregulation (4. überarb. Aufl.) [Stress, anxiety, and activity regulation (4th revised ed.)]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. WeinmanS. WrightM. JohnstonEds., Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (2002). Das Konzept der Selbstwirksamkeit [The concept of self-efficacy]. In M. JerusalemD. HopfEds., Selbstwirksamkeit und Motivationsprozesse in Bildungsinstitutionen [Self-efficacy and motivational processes in educational institutions] (pp. 28–53). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. & Renner, B. (2000). Social-cognitive predictors of health behavior: Action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy. Health Psychology (19, 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.5.487 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schyns, B. & Collani, G. v. (2002). A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320244000148 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shell, D. F., Colvin, C. & Bruning, R. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, attribution, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade-level and achievement-level differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 386–398. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Solomon, L. J. & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 503–509. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J. & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663–676. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J. & Kitsantas, A. (2007). A writer’s discipline: The development of self-regulatory skill. In S. HidiP. BoscoloEds., Writing and motivation (pp. 51–69). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar