Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Personality Measurement and Profile in a European Sample of Civil Airline Pilots

Published Online:May 03, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000466

Abstract

Abstract. The study examined the psychometric properties of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R, UK edition) in a large European sample of civil airline pilots. The NEO PI-R is a comprehensive and robust measure of personality that has been validated across cultures and contexts. Furthermore, the personality profile of the pilot sample was examined and compared to a normative sample representing the UK working population. Data from 591 pilots (95.1% male) were collected. Analyses include the internal reliability and factorial validity (precisely, Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling) to examine the measurement equivalence of the NEO PI-R with reference to UK norms (N = 1,301). Internal reliability estimates of the NEO PI-R scores were good at the domain level, but generally weak at the facet level. The structural model in the pilot sample was congruent with the general working population sample. Furthermore, there was convincing evidence for a distinct personality profile of civil pilots, although the stability of this profile will require further validation. The NEO PI-R’s validity in the assessment of general personality in civil airline pilots is discussed, along with implications of the results for the utility of personality assessment in civil aviation contexts.

References

  • Allik, J., Church, A. T., Ortiz, F. A., Rossier, J., Hřebíčková, M., de Fruyt, F., Realo, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). Mean profiles of the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117692100 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Callister, J. D., King, R. E., Retzlaff, P. D., & Marsh, R. W. (1999). Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles of male and female U.S. Air Force pilots. Military Medicine, 164, 885–890. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, J. S., Castaneda, M., & Pulos, S. (2009). Meta-analysis of personality assessments as predictors of military aviation training success. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 20, 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508410903415872 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) manual (J. RustW. LordEds. (UK edition). Oxford, UK: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dolan, C. V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5 and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1994.tb01039.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Douglas, H., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2012). Distinguishing the Dark Triad: Evidence from the Five-Factor Model and the Hogan Development Survey. Psychology, 03, 237–242. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.33033 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • EASA. (2015). Task Force on Measures Following the Accident of Germanwings Flight 9525. Final Report. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fife, D. A., Mendoza, J. L., & Terry, R. (2012). The assessment of reliability under range restriction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 862–888. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411430225 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fine, P. M., & Hartman, B. O. (1968). Psychiatric strengths and weaknesses of typical Air Force pilots (SAM-TR-68–121). San Antonio, TX: US Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fitzgibbons, A., Davis, D., & Schutte, P. C. (2004). Pilot personality profile using the NEO PI-R (No. NASA/TM-204–213237). Hampton, VI: NASA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Front, C. M. (2014). Commentary on the article by King: Good to go or disqualified? Interrelated but distinct tasks, challenges, and tools in pilot selection. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 24, 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2014.860841 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of Personality: A 10 Year Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Geiser, C. (2012). Data analysis with Mplus. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goeters, K. M., Maschke, P., & Eißfeldt, H. (2004). Ability requirements in core aviation professions: Job analysis of airline pilots and air traffic controllers. In K. M. GoetersEd., Aviation psychology: Practice and research (pp. 99–119). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstee, W. K., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • IATA. (2012). Guidance material and best practices for pilot aptitude testing (2nd ed.). Montreal, Canada: IATA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Martinussen, M., & Hunter, D. R. (2010). Aviation psychology and human factors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198291009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observers perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Rolland, J.-P., De Fruyt, F., Reynolds, S. K., Pham-Scottez, A., … Bagby, R. M. (2008). Scoring the DSM-IV personality disorders using the five-factor model: Development and validation of normative scores for North American, French, and Dutch-Flemish samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2008.22.5.433 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: Can the Five-Factor Model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00144 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Picano, J. J., Williams, T. J., & Roland, R. R. (2006). Assessment and selection of high-risk operational personnel. In C. H. KennedyE. A. Zillmer (Eds.). Military Psychology (pp. 353–370). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & Lebreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(Suppl. 1), S41–S60. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1894 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Ringlever, L., Hiemstra, M., Engels, R. C. M. E., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2013). The parent version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: Omega as an alternative to alpha and a test for measurement invariance. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000119 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Wakcher, S., Cross, K., & Blackman, M. C. (2003). Personality comparison of airline pilot incumbents, applicants, and the general population norms on the 16PF. Psychological Reports, 92, 773–780. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.773 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zeigler-Hill, V., & Marcus, D. K. (2016). The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14854–000 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar