Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

The Twin Relationship Questionnaire

Testing a Five-Factor Model From Early to Middle Childhood

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000504

Abstract. Twins’ relationships evoke critical dilemmas for parents and teachers regarding raising and educating their twins. The current study provides comprehensive psychometric information about the Twin Relationship Questionnaire (TRQ; Fortuna, Goldner, & Knafo, 2010) as examined in nine samples, using mothers’ and fathers’ reports on 1,560 pairs of twins, tested in five measurement points from age 3 to age 9. On half of the subsamples, we conducted principal component analyses (PCA), whereas on the other subsamples, we conducted confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Five factors were found in the PCA and confirmed by the CFA: conflict, closeness, dependence, dominance, and rivalry. All scales showed adequate internal consistencies and corrected item-total correlations. Correlation matrixes between scales demonstrate a triad of conflict, rivalry, and dominance scales, as opposed to the dyad of closeness and dependence. As evidence for the TRQ’s reliability and validity, we report the degree of agreement between mothers and fathers, the 10-month stability of mothers’ reports, and the associations of the TRQ subscales with experimentally assessed prosocial behaviors between the twins at age 6.5, and with the twins’ reports on their closeness at age 11. The replication of the findings across ages and raters reinforces the reliability and validity of the questionnaire.

References

  • Ainslie, R. C. (1985). The psychology of twinship. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Avinun, R., & Knafo, A. (2013). The Longitudinal Israeli Study of Twins (LIST) – an integrative view of social development. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2012.73 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beaujean, A. A. (2014). Latent variable modeling using R – a step-by-step guide. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bekkhus, M., Staton, S., Borge, A. I. H., & Thorpe, K. (2011). Conflict, closeness and comfort: The inter-twin relationship as a risk factor for behavioral difficulties. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 14, 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.14.5.444 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boer, F., Westenberg, P. M., & McHale, S. M. (1997). The factorial structure of the sibling relationship inventory (SRI) in American and Dutch samples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 851–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597146009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., & McCoy, J. K. (1994). Contributions of family relationships and child temperaments to longitudinal variations in sibling relationship quality and sibling relationship styles. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.8.3.274 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cabrera-Nguyen, P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1, 99–103. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2010.8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Castiello, U., Becchio, C., Zoia, S., Nelini, C., Sartori, L., Blason, L., … Gallese, V. (2010). Wired to be social: The ontogeny of human Interaction. PLoS One, 5, e13199. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013199 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Derkman, M. M. S., Scholte, R. H. J., Van der Veld, W. V., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2010). Factorial and construct validity of the sibling relationship questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000037 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, J., Deater-Deckard, K., & Pickering, K. (1999). Siblings, parents, and partners: Family relationships within a longitudinal community study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00521 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feinberg, M. E., McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Cumsille, P. (2003). Sibling differentiation: Sibling and parent relationship trajectories in adolescence. Child Development, 74, 1261–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00606 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fortuna, K., Goldner, I., & Knafo, A. (2010). Twin Relationships: A comparison across monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, and nontwin siblings in early childhood. Family Science, 1, 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2010.569367 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Foy, A. K., Vernon, P. A., & Jang, K. (2001). Examining the dimensions of intimacy in twin and peer relationships. Twin Research, 4, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.4.6.443 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fraley, R. C., & Tancredy, C. M. (2012). Twin and sibling attachment in a nationally representative sample. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432936 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children’s perceptions of the qualities of sibling relationships. Child Development, 56, 448–461. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129733 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales, Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1805/344 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gordon, L. M. (2015). Twins and kindergarten separation: Divergent beliefs of principals, teachers, parents, and twins. Educational Policy, 29, 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813510778 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hay, D. A., & Preedy, P. (2006). Meeting the educational needs of multiple birth children. Early Human Development, 82, 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.03.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. Retrieved from https://arrow.dit.ie/libart/4/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2014). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. ReisC. M. JuddEds., Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 473–503). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Joseph, E. D. (1975). Psychoanalysis–science and research: Twin studies as a paradigm. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 23, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306517502300101 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kelley, H. H., Berschied, A., Christenson, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., … Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. New York, NY: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Knafo, A. (2006). The Longitudinal Israeli Study of Twins (LIST): Children’s social development as influenced by genetics, abilities, and socialization. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 791–798. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.9.6.791 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koch, H. L. (1966). Twins and twin relations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kramer, L., & Baron, L. A. (1995). Parental perceptions of children’s sibling relationships. Family Relations, 44, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/584746 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loh, C. Y., & Elliott, J. M. (1998). Cooperation and competition as a function of zygosity in 7- to 9-year-old twins. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00034-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lytton, H. (1977). Do parents create, or respond to, differences in twins? Developmental Psychology, 13, 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.13.5.456 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Madsen, M. C. (1967). Cooperative and competitive motivation of children in three Mexican sub-cultures. Psychological Reports, 20, 1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1967.20.3c.1307 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neyer, F. J. (2002). Twin relationship in old age: A developmental perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502192001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penninkilampi-Kerola, V., Moilanen, I., & Kaprio, J. (2005). Co-twin dependence, social interactions, and academic achievement: A population-based study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505054521 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piontelli, A. (2002). Twins: From fetus to child. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Prudon, P. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis as a tool in research using questionnaires: A critique. Comprehensive Psychology, 4, 10. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.4.10 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robin, M., Maner-Idrissi, G. L., & Corroyer, D. (1998). Mothers’ representations of their 13-month-old twins and child-raising attitudes. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199821)19:1<1::AID-IMHJ1>3.0.CO;2-T First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rutter, M., & Redshaw, J. (1991). Annotation: Growing up as a twin: Twin-singleton differences in psychological development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb01916.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schave, B., & Ciriello, J. (1983). Identity and intimacy in twins. New York, NY: Praeger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, S., Mustafić, M., & Junker, S. (2015). Attachment to the romantic partner and sibling: Attachment hierarchies of twins and non-twin siblings. Interpersona, 9, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v9i2.195 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Segal, H., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2018). Twin rivalry in childhood. In S. HartN. A. JonesEds., The psychology of rivalry (pp. 111–129). New York, NY: Nova Science. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Segal, N. L. (1984). Cooperation, competition, and altruism within twin sets: A reappraisal. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(84)90021-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Segal, N. L. (2002). Co-conspirators and double-dealers: A twin film analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00176-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Segal, N. L., & Hershberger, S. L. (1999). Cooperation and competition between twins: Findings from a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00039-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Segal, N. L., Hershberger, S. L., & Arad, S. (2003). Meeting one’s twin: Perceived social closeness and familiarity. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490300100105 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Segal, N. L., & Russell, J. M. (1992). Twins in the classroom: School policy issues and recommendations. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532768xjepc0301_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smilansky, S. (1992). Twins and their development. Rockville, MD: BJE Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stoneman, Z., & Brody, G. (1993). Sibling temperaments, conflict, warmth, and role asymmetry. Child Development, 64, 1786–1800. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131469 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tancredy, C. M., & Fraley, R. C. (2006). The nature of adult twin relationships: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.78 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tourrette, C., Robin, M., & Josse, D. (1989). Treating twins as individuals: Maternal educative practices. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172610 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Volling, B. L., & Blandon, A. Y. (2005). Positive indicators of sibling relationship quality: The sibling inventory of behavior. In K. A. MooreL. H. LippmanEds., What do children need to flourish: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 203–219). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Von Bracken, H. (1934). Mutual intimacy in twins. Character and Personality, 2, 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1934.tb02106.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yirmiya, K., Segal, N. L., Bloch, G., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2018). Prosocial and self‐interested intra‐twin pair behavior in monozygotic and dizygotic twins in the early to middle childhood transition. Developmental Science, 21, e12665. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12665 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of personality assessment, 52, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar