The Coping Scales From the German Stress and Coping Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents
Psychometric and Factorial Evidence for Five Language Versions
Abstract
Abstract. The coping scales from the Stress and Coping Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (SSKJ 3–8; Lohaus, Eschenbeck, Kohlmann, & Klein-Heßling, 2018) are subscales of a theoretically based and empirically validated self-report instrument for assessing, originally in the German language, the five strategies of seeking social support, problem solving, avoidant coping, palliative emotion regulation, and anger-related emotion regulation. The present study examined factorial structure, measurement invariance, and internal consistency across five different language versions: English, French, Russian, Spanish, and Ukrainian. The original German version was compared to each language version separately. Participants were 5,271 children and adolescents recruited from primary and secondary schools from Germany (n = 3,177), France (n = 329), Russia (n = 378), the Dominican Republic (n = 243), Ukraine (n = 437), and several English-speaking countries such as Australia, Great Britain, Ireland, and the USA (English-speaking sample: n = 707). For the five different language versions of the SSKJ 3–8 coping questionnaire, confirmatory factor analyses showed configural as well as metric and partial scalar invariance (French) or partial metric invariance (English, Russian, Spanish, Ukrainian). Internal consistency coefficients of the coping scales were also acceptable to good. Significance of the results was discussed with special emphasis on cross-cultural research on individual differences in coping.
References
1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
(2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
(2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022389
(2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87
(2017). Development of a coping with stress scale for a non-western population of children and adolescents. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 30, 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2017.1330951
(2015). The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000241
(2012). A Turkish adaptation of the coping scales from the German Stress and Coping Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000088
(2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.18
(2006). Die Diagnostik von Stressbewältigung mit dem „Fragebogen zur Erhebung von Stress und Stressbewältigung im Kindes- und Jugendalter” (SSKJ 3–8): Faktorielle und psychometrische Analysen
([The assessment of coping with the “Questionnaire for the Measurement of Stress and Coping in Children and Adolescents (SSKJ 3–8)”: Factorial and psychometric analyses] . Diagnostica, 52, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.52.3.1312010). Mediennutzung als Bewältigungsstrategie von Kindern und Jugendlichen: Eine Erweiterung des SSKJ 3–8
([Media use as a way of coping: An addition of the SSKJ 3–8] . Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 18, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a0000192018). Development of coping strategies from childhood to adolescence: Cross-sectional and longitudinal trends. European Journal of Health Psychology, 25, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1027/2512-8442/a000005
(2010). Identity and future concerns among adolescents from Italy, Turkey and Germany: Intra- and between-cultural comparisons. Journal of Youth Studies, 13, 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903447528
(2016). Values, coping strategies, and psychopathological symptoms among adolescents with asthma: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 680–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116636686
(2008). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63, 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X
(Kitayama, S.Cohen, D. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of cultural psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2012). Stressbewältigung von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland und der Türkei: Interkulturelle Unterschiede in der Suche nach sozialer Unterstützung?
([Coping in children and adolescents in Germany and Turkey: Cultural differences in seeking of social support?] Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 20, 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a0000582013). Collectivism and coping: Current theories, evidence, and measurements of collective coping. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.640681
(1993).
(Vigilance and cognitive avoidance as concepts in coping research . In H. W. KrohneEd., Attention and avoidance: Strategies in coping with aversiveness (pp. 19–50). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, N Y: Springer.
(2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
(2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
(2006). Fragebogen zur Erhebung von Stress und Stressbewältigug im Kindes- und Jugendalter (SSKJ 3–8)
([Questionnaire for the Measurement of Stress and Coping in Children and Adolescents (SSKJ 3–8)] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2018). Fragebogen zur Erhebung von Stress und Stressbewältigug im Kindes- und Jugendalter–Revision (SSKJ 3–8 R)
([Revised Questionnaire for the Measurement of Stress and Coping in Children and Adolescents (SSKJ 3–8 R)] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right–Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032773
(2012). Competence in coping with stress in adolescents from three regions of the world. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9719-6
(2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
(2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
(1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41, 813–819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.7.813
(2016). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modelling. R package version 0.4-14. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
(2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216
(2017). Can we really use available scales for child and adolescent psychopathology across cultures? A systematic review of cross-cultural measurement invariance data. Transcultural Psychiatry, 54, 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461516689215
(2000).
(Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data . In M. E. SobelM. P. BeckerEds., Sociological Methodology 2000 (pp. 165–200). Washington, DC: ASA.2011). The development of coping across childhood and adolescence: An integrative review and critique of research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410384923
(