Skip to main content
Original Article

The Shape of Emotion Regulation

Trait Emotion Regulation as Density Distributions of States

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000586

Abstract. The Density Distribution approach to personality characterizes traits using both mean levels and within-person variability of behaviors. Recent theory highlights that emotion regulation (ER) is inherently variable, and this Density Distribution approach seems particularly suitable to understand both average tendencies and dynamics of ER as person-specific characteristics. However, there is not yet empirical evidence for this suggestion. To fill this gap, we investigated the reliability of density distribution information gathered from repeated assessments of state ER (within-person mean levels and standard deviations). Specifically, we studied the reliability of ER strategy use in terms of internal consistency and short- and long-term stability within and across two waves of experience sampling (N = 153, M = 70 measurement occasions). Across both average tendencies and within-person variation, we found that individuals used different ER strategies relatively consistently. Overall, within-person ER mean levels and standard deviations were stable within and across the waves. Taken together, this suggests that the person-specific overall pattern of ER use in daily life is captured reliably using experience-sampling methodology (ESM).

References

  • Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blanke, E. S., Brose, A., Kalokerinos, E. K., Erbas, Y., Riediger, M., & Kuppens, P. (2019). Mix it to fix it: Emotion regulation variability in daily life. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000566 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blanke, E. S., Schmidt, M. J., Riediger, M., & Brose, A. (2019). Thinking mindfully: How mindfulness relates to rumination and reflection in daily life. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000659 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brans, K., Koval, P., Verduyn, P., Lim, Y. L., & Kuppens, P. (2013). The regulation of negative and positive affect in daily life. Emotion, 13, 926–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032400 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brockman, R., Ciarrochi, J., Parker, P., & Kashdan, T. (2017). Emotion regulation strategies in daily life: Mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 46, 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2016.1218926 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Gerstorf, D., & Voelkle, M. C. (2019). The measurement of within-person affect variation. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000583 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Conner, T. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). Trends in ambulatory self-report: The role of momentary experience in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182546f18 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Du, H., & Wang, L. (2018). Reliabilities of intraindividual variability indicators with autocorrelated longitudinal data: Implications for longitudinal study designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1457939 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.662 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eldesouky, L., & English, T. (2018). Another year older, another year wiser? Emotion regulation strategy selection and flexibility across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 33, 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000251 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016786 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. E. (2009). In favor of the synthetic resolution to the person-situation debate. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2007). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haines, S. J., Gleeson, J., Kuppens, P., Hollenstein, T., Ciarrochi, J., Labuschagne, I., … Koval, P. (2016). The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being. Psychological Science, 27, 1651–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616669086 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kashdan, T. B., & Steger, M. F. (2006). Expanding the topography of social anxiety: An experience-sampling assessment of positive emotions, positive events, and emotion suppression. Psychological Science, 17, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01674.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loch, N., Hiller, W., & Witthöft, M. (2011). Der Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) Erste teststatistische Überprüfung einer deutschen Adaption [The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) Psychometric evaluation of a German adaptation]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Forschung und Praxis, 40, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000079 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Mestdagh, M., Pe, M. L., Pestman, W., Verdonck, S., Kuppens, P., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2018). The relative variability index as a generic mean-corrected variability measure for bounded variables. Psychological Methods, 23, 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000153 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. JohnR. W. RobinsL. A. PervinEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Richter, D., & Schupp, J. (2015). The SOEP Innovation Sample (SOEP IS). Schmollers Jahrbuch, 135, 389–399. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). On the relation of mean reaction time and intraindividual reaction time variability. Psychology and Aging, 24, 841–857. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017799 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siebert, S., Blanke, E. S., & Brose, A. (2017). Everyday experiences in the SOEP Innovation Sample (EE-SOEP-IS): A multi-method study. In J. BritzkeJ. SchuppEds., SOEP Wave Report 2016 (pp. 69–72). Berlin, Germany: DIW Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar