Satisfied and Dissatisfied Couples
Positive and Negative Dimensions, Conflict Styles, and Relationships With Family of Origin
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to analyze marital functioning of satisfied couples and dissatisfied couples by comparing satisfied couples (85 couples), dissatisfied couples (55 couples), and dissatisfied couples in therapy (86 couples). The sample was composed of totally 226 married couples. Measures addressed topics such as positive and negative dimensions of marital functioning, conflict styles (compromise, violence, avoidance, and offence), and the quality of the relationship with family of origin. Results indicated that in comparison to dissatisfied couples, satisfied couples have more positive and less negative dimensions, a higher ratio between positivity and negativity, more appropriate conflict styles (more compromise and less violence, avoidance, and offence), as well as a better relationship with their family of origin. Satisfied couples significantly showed the highest levels of positive dimensions, while couples in therapy reported the highest levels of negative dimensions. Dissatisfied couples were in-between.
References
(1997). Social support: Distinguishing clinical and volunteer couples. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 111–119.
(1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 612–624.
(2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.
(1985). Parent adolescent communication and the circumflex model. Child Development, 56, 438–447.
(
2000 ). Marital quality and marital distress: Relational and cognitive variables. Milan: Catholic University Doctoral Dissertation. Unpublished manuscript.(2000). Il conflitto coniugale tra aspetti cognitivi ed interattivo-relazionali
[The marital conflict between cognitive and interactive-relational aspects] . In , Cognizioni sociali e relazioni familiari.[Social cognitions and family relations] (pp. 125–160). Milano: Franco Angeli.(2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In , Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2004). Promuovere le competenze della coppia. Il Couples Coping Enhancement Training
[Promote couple-skills. The couples coping enhancement training] . Roma: Carocci Editore.(2005). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71–89.
(2004). The couples coping enhancement training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations, 53, 477–484.
(2004). Understanding and altering the longitudinal course of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 862–879.
(2001). Reconsidering the role of conflict in marriage. In , Couples in conflict (pp. 59–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1995). Multivariate statistics for family psychology research. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 144–160.
(1989). Styles of conflict resolution and cooperation between divorced parents: Effects on child behavior and adjustment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 560–575.
(2000). Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 42–58.
(1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81.
(1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 458–463.
(1985). Family measurement techniques: Locke Marital Adjustment Test and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy, 13, 66–71.
(2004). Coding intimacy in couples’ interactions. In , Couple observational coding systems (pp. 243–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1986). Going beyond social support: The role of social relationships in adaptation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 454–460.
(1994). Maintenance strategies and physical affection as predictors of love, liking, and satisfaction in marriage. Communication Reports, 7, 89–98.
(1990). Deciding to divorce: A process guided by social exchange, attachment and cognitive dissonance theories. Journal of Divorce, 13, 23–35.
(2007). Demand-withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: Rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 218–226.
(1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47–77.
(1991). Explanations for family events in distressed and nondistressed couples: Is one type of expla nation used consistently?. Journal of Family Psychology, 4, 341–353.
(1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses be positive and negative about their marriage?. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489–502.
(2004). Revision in memories of relationship development: Do biases persist over time?. Personal Relationships, 11, 79–97.
(1979). Measuring marital satisfaction in three generations: Positive and negative dimensions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 387–398.
(2005). A prime time for marital/relational intervention: A review of the transition to parenthood literature with treatment recommendations. American Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 319–336.
(1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 57–75.
(1994). What predicts divorce: The relationships between marital processes and marital outcome. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233.
(1982). Partnerschaftsprobleme: Diagnose und Therapie. Berlin: Springer.
(2000). Repeating the errors of our parents? Family of origin spouse violence and observed conflict management in engaged couples. Family Process, 39, 219–235.
(1993). Attributing negative intent to wife behavior: The attribution of maritally violent versus nonviolent men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 206–211.
(2006). “His” and “Her” relationships? A review of the empirical evidence. In , The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 273–291). New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1992). Stability and developmental change in marital quality: A three-wave panel analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 582–594.
(2004). Social networks, structural interdependence, and marital quality over the transition to marriage: A prospective analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 383–395.
(2000). The division of labor in close relationships: An asymmetrical conflict issue. Personal Relationships, 7, 263–282.
(1997). Stili di conflitto familiare: Una scala di misurazione
[Styles of family conflict: A measuring scale] . Testing Psychometrics Methodology, 4, 109–116.(1999). Building a science of couple relationships: Comments on two articles by Gottman and Levenson. Family Process, 38, 167–173.
(1959). Short marital adjustment prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255.
(2001). Fighting for your marriage. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
(2008). Marital relationships: A social exchange theory perspective. American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 402–412.
(1998). Communication in early marriage: Responses to conflict, nonverbal accuracy, and conversational patterns. In , The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 11–43). University Press: Cambridge.
(1987). Assessment of marital discord. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1986). Determinants and consequences of exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in adult romantic involvements. Human Relations, 39, 45–63.
(
1991 ). Scala di supporto[Support scale] . Unpublished manuscript, Catholic University, Milan..(2006). Family identity. Ties, symbols, and transitions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2000). Cognition during marital conflict: The relationship of thought and talk. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 479–502.
(2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insight on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41, 659–675.
(1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
(2003). Family influences on commitment: Examining the family of origin correlates of relationship commitment attitudes. Personal Relationships, 10, 453–474.
