Skip to main content
Original Articles and Reviews

Primer on the Contribution of Crime Scene Behavior to the Forensic Assessment of Sexual Offenders

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000324

Abstract. Over the last decades several attempts in developing incrementally valid risk indicators above and beyond standard actuarial and dynamic risk assessment instruments have been undertaken without much success. The current review will summarize current developments regarding the validity of detailed crime scene analysis for forensic assessments of sexual offenders. To this end, this overview will focus on two issues: First, we will discuss the issue of sexual offender risk assessment based on crime scene information. Second, we will outline how crime scene behavior contributes to the assessment of sexual interest in children. In each section we will introduce the reader to new approaches and instruments for risk assessment and diagnosing pedophilic sexual interest based on crime scene information, respectively, and discuss their validity. Finally, we will discuss the implications of these recent developments for risk assessment, risk management, offender treatment, and future research.

References

  • Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Mittelman, M. & Rouleau, J.-L. (1988). Multiple paraphilic diagnoses among sex offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 16, 153–168. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alison, L. J., Snook, B. & Stein, K. L. (2001). Unobtrusive measurement: Using police information for forensic research. Qualitative Research, 1, 241–254. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alison, L. J. & Stein, K. L. (2001). Vicious circles: Accounts of stranger sexual assault reflect abusive variants of conventional interactions. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 12, 515–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585180127391 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andrews, D. A. & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Babchishin, K. M., Nunes, K. L. & Hermann, C. A. (2013). The validity of Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures of sexual attraction to children: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 487–499. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartels, R., Thornton, D. & Lehmann, R. J. B. (2017). Validating the utility of the Wilson Sex Fantasy Questionnaire with men who have sexually abused children. Manuscript in preparation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bennell, C., Alison, L. J., Stein, K. L., Alison, E. K. & Canter, D. V. (2001). Sexual offenses against children as the abusive exploitation of conventional adult-child relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501182001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blanchard, R. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9536-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E. & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.1.118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borg, I. & Groenen, P. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brouillette-Alarie, S., Longpré, N. & Proulx, J. (2015, October). A re-validation of the Screening Scale of Pedophilic Crime Scene Behavior (SSPC) in a Canadian sample: The contribution of phallometric data. Paper presented at the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Montreal, PQ, Canada. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Burgess, A. W., Groth, A. N. & Holmstrom, L. L. (1978). Sexual assault of children and adolescents. Lexington, MA: Lexington Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Canter, D. V. (1994). Criminal shadows. London, UK: Harper Collins. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Canter, D. V., Bennell, C., Alison, L. J. & Reddy, S. (2003). Differentiating sex offences: A behaviorally based thematic classification of stranger rapes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.526 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Canter, D. V. & Heritage, R. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offence behaviour: Developments in “offender profiling”. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1, 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189008408469 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, M., Seghorn, T. & Calmas, W. (1969). Sociometric study of the sex offender. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027185 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dahle, K.-P., Biedermann, J., Lehmann, R. J. B. & Gallasch-Nemitz, F. (2014). The development of the crime scene behavior risk measure for sexual offense recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000088 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dahle, K.-P., Lehmann, R. J. B. & Richter, A. (2014). Die Screening Skala Pädophilen Tatverhaltens [The Screening Scale of Pedophilic Crime Scene Behavior]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 8, 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-014-0261-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eher, R., Schilling, F., Hansmann, B., Pumberger, T., Nitschke, J., Habermeyer, E. & Mokros, A. (2016). Sadism and violent reoffending in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 46–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214566715 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • First, M. B. (2010). DSM-5 proposals for paraphilias: Suggestions for reducing false positives related to use of behavioral manifestations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1239–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9657-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gerhold, C. K., Browne, K. D. & Beckett, R. (2007). Predicting recidivism in adolescent sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodwill, A. M., Lehmann, R. J. B., Beauregard, E. & Andrei, A. (2016). An action phase approach to offender profiling. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 21, 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12069 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Groth, A. N. & Birnbaum, H. J. (1978). Adult sexual orientation and attraction to underage persons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 7, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542377 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Häkkänen, H., Lindlöf, P. & Santtila, P. (2004). Crime scene actions and offender characteristics in a sample of Finnish stranger rapes. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K. & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K. & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K. & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014421 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K. & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L. & Cormier, C. A. (2015). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Helmus, L., Ó Ciardha, C. & Seto, M. C. (2015). The screening scale for pedophilic interests (SSPI): Construct, predictive, and incremental validity. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000099 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Helmus, L., Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K. & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211409951 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, R. L. & Hess, D. T. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900407 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jahnke, S., Imhoff, R. & Hoyer, J. (2015). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: Two comparative surveys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0312-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jahnke, S., Schmidt, A. F., Geradt, M. & Hoyer, J. (2015). Stigma-related stress and its correlates among men with pedophilic sexual interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2173–2187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0503-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kalmus, E. & Beech, A. R. (2005). Forensic assessment of sexual interest: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.12.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Knight, R. A. (2010). Typologies for rapists: The generation of a new structural model. In A. SchlankEd., The sexual predator (Vol. 5, pp. 1–28). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Knight, R. A., Carter, D. L. & Prentky, R. A. (1989). A system for the classification of child molesters: Reliability and application. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626089004001001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Knight, R. A. & King, M. W. (2012). Typologies for child molesters: The generation of a new structural model. In B. K. SchwartzEd., The sexual offender (Vol. 7, pp. 1–32). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leclerc, B., Proulx, J. & Beauregard, E. (2009). Examining the modus operandi of sexual offenders against children and its practical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.08.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lehmann, R. J. B., Goodwill, A. M., Gallasch-Nemitz, F., Biedermann, J. & Dahle, K.-P. (2013). Applying crime scene analysis to the prediction of sexual recidivism in stranger rapes. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000015 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lehmann, R. J. B., Goodwill, A. M., Hanson, R. K. & Dahle, K.-P. (2014). Crime scene behaviors indicate risk-relevant propensities of child molesters. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 1008–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814521807 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lehmann, R. J. B., Goodwill, A. M., Hanson, R. K. & Dahle, K.-P. (2015). Acquaintance rape: Applying crime scene analysis to the prediction of sexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 679–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215569542 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lehmann, R. J. B., Hanson, R. K., Babchishin, K. M., Gallasch-Nemitz, F., Biedermann, J. & Dahle, K.-P. (2013). Interpreting multiple risk scales for sex offenders: Evidence for averaging. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033098 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K. & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marshall, W. L. (2013). Phallometric assessments of sexual interests: An update. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-013-0428-6 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCann, K. & Lussier, P. (2008). Antisociality, sexual deviance, and sexual reoffending in juvenile sex offenders: A meta-analytical investigation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204008320260 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., Burchard, B. L., Zeoli, S. & Ellerby, E. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McPhail, I. V., Hermann, C. A., Fernane, S., Fernandez, Y. M., Nunes, K. L. & Cantor, J. M. (2017). Validity in phallometric testing for sexual interests in children: A meta-analytic review. Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117706139 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mokros, A. (2013). Die latente Struktur sexueller Präferenzstörungen am Beispiel des Sadismus und der Pädophilie [The latent structure of sexual preference disorders using sadism and pedophilia as examples]. Z Sex-Forsch, 26, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1335616 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mokros, A., Schilling, F., Weiss, K., Nitschke, J. & Eher, R. (2014). Sadism in sexual offenders: Evidence for dimensionality. Psychological Assessment, 26, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034861 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pedneault, A. (2014, October). Linking crime scene behaviors and propensities in child molesters: A replication. Paper presented at the Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA), San Diego, CA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pedneault, A. (2015, October). A validation of the SSPC in a sample of US child molesters. Paper presented at the Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA), Montreal, Canada. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, A. F., Babchishin, K. M. & Lehmann, R. J. B. (2017). A meta-analysis of viewing time measures of sexual interest in children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0806-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R. & Imhoff, R. (2015). Indirect measures in forensic contexts. In T. M. OrtnerF. J. R. van de VijverEds., Behavior-based assessment in psychology: Going beyond self-report in the personality, affective, motivation, and social domains (pp. 173–194). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, A. F., Mokros, A. & Banse, R. (2013). Is pedophilic sexual preference continuous? A taxometric analysis based on direct and indirect measures. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1146–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033326 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, S., Pettke, O., Lehmann, R. J. B. & Dahle, K.-P. (2017). Sexualstraftäter ohne und mit Migrationshintergrund aus dem Nahen Osten und Nordafrika [Sexual offenders with and without a migration background from the Middle East and North Africa]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 11, 322–334. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M. & Blanchard, R. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. & Lalumiére, M. L. (2001). A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009510328588 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C., Sandler, J. C. & Freeman, N. J. (2015). The revised screening scale for pedophilic interests: Predictive and concurrent validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29, 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215618375 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C., Stephens, S., Lalumière, M. L. & Cantor, J. M. (2015). The revised screening scale for pedophilic interests (SSPI-2): Development and criterion-related validation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215612444 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ward, T., Mann, R. E. & Gannon, T. A. (2007). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ward, T. & Siegert, R. J. (2002). Toward a comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: A theory knitting perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, 319–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160208401823 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wortley, R. K. & Smallbone, S. W. (2006). Applying situational principles to sexual offending against children. In R. K. WortleyS. W. SmallboneEds., Situational prevention of child abuse, crime prevention studies (Vol. 19, pp. 7–37). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar