Skip to main content
Original Articles and Reviews

Child Sexual Exploitation Materials Offenders

A Review

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000326

Abstract. The downloading and possession of Child Sexual Exploitation Materials (CSEM; also referred to as child pornography and indecent images of children) is a commonly convicted type of Internet sexual offenses. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on CSEM offenders. We first provide a summary of the key motivations of CSEM offenders, characteristics of CSEM offenders compared to contact sexual offenders against children, and important facilitative factors. We then review the factors related to recidivism among CSEM offenders. Finally, we describe current developments in the risk assessment, police case prioritization, and treatment approaches for CSEM offenders. Generally, CSEM offenders hold a sexual interest in children, are low on antisocial tendencies, and pose a low risk to reoffend (including contact sexual offending). Key facilitative factors for CSEM offending include access to children, offense-supportive cognitions, and sexual arousal. Factors indicative of antisocial tendencies (e.g., criminal history) are associated with an increased risk of reoffending. Lastly, we address atypical sexual interest, socio-affective dysfunctions, and strategies for maintaining an offense-free lifestyle as key treatment targets for CSEM offenders. Lower treatment dosage, however, should be considered given CSEM-exclusive offenders’ lower risk level for contact sexual offenses. We hope that this review will inspire others to explore the current research gaps in future studies.

References

  • Allen, M. (2016). Police-reported crime statistics in Canada, 2015 (Report no. 85-002-X). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Statistics Canada, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/access_acces/alternative_alternatif.action?l=eng&loc=/pub/85-002-x/2016001/article/14642-eng.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andrews, D. A. & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andrews, D. A. & Dowden, C. (2007). The Risk–Need–Responsivity model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections: Crime-prevention jurisprudence. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 49, 439–464. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.49.4.439 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ariely, D. & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.501 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Babchishin, K. M., Curry, S. D., Fedoroff, J. P., Bradford, J. & Seto, M. C. (2017). Inhibiting sexual arousal to children: Correlates and its influence on the validity of penile plethysmography. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0952-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K. & Hermann, C. A. (2011). The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 92–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210370708 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K. & VanZuylen, H. (2015). Online child pornography offenders are different: A meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartels, R. M. & Merdian, H. L. (2016). The implicit theories of child sexual exploitation material users: An initial conceptualization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 26, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.11.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartels, R. M., Merdian, H. L. & Rowland, R. (2016, November). Child sexual exploitation material offenders: Pinpointing their implicit theories. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Orlando, FL. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beier, K. M., Ahlers, C. J., Goecker, D., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Hupp, E. & Schaefer, G. A. (2009). Can pedophiles be reached for primary prevention of child sexual abuse? First results of the Berlin Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 851–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940903174188 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beier, K. M., Grundmann, D., Kuhle, L. F., Scherner, G., Konrad, A. & Amelung, T. (2015). The German Dunkelfeld project: A pilot study to prevent child sexual abuse and the use of child abusive images. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12785 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bouffard, J. A. & Miller, H. A. (2014). The role of sexual arousal and overperception of sexual intent within the decision to engage in sexual coercion. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513515950 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brankley, A., Babchishin, K. M. & Hanson, R. K. (2018). STABLE-2007 demonstrates predictive and incremental validity in assessing risk-relevant propensities for sexual offending: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse. Manuscript accepted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Briggs, P., Simon, W. T. & Simonsen, S. (2011). An exploratory study of Internet-initiated sexual offenses and the chat room sex offender: Has the Internet enabled a new typology of sex offender? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210384275 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clevenger, S. L., Navarro, J. N. & Jasinski, J. L. (2016). A matter of low self-control? Exploring differences between child pornography possessors and child pornography producers/distributers using self-control theory. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214557173 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, L. & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 90–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dauvergne, M. & Turner, J. (2010). Police-reported crime statistics in Canada, 2009 (Report No. 85-002-X). Ottawa, ON: Canada. Statistics Canada, Justice Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2010002/article/11292-fra.htm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Day, A., Ross, S., Casey, S., Vess, J., Johns, D. & Hobbs, G. (2017). The intensity and timing of sex offender treatment. Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217745069 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dervley, R., Perkins, D., Whitehead, H., Bailey, A., Gillespie, S. & Squire, T. (2017). Themes in participant feedback on a risk reduction programme for child sexual exploitation material offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1269958 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dombert, B., Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., Briken, P., Hoyer, J., Neutze, J. & Osterheider, M. (2016). How common is men’s self-reported sexual interest in prepubescent children? The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1020108 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eke, A. W., Helmus, L. M. & Seto, M. C. (2017). A validation study of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Assessment Tool (CPORT). Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eke, A. W. & Seto, M. C. (2012). Risk assessment of online offenders for law enforcement. In K. RibislE. QuayleEds., Internet child pornography: Understanding and preventing online child abuse (pp. 148–168). Devon, UK: Willan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eke, A. W., Seto, M. C. & Williams, J. (2011). Examining the criminal history and future offending of child pornography offenders: An extended prospective follow-up study. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9252-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliott, I. A. (2012). Psychological characteristics of users of child pornography on the Internet (Doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham, UK. Retrieved from http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/2822/1/Elliott12PhD.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Elliott, I. A. & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Psychological profiles and processes in viewers of Internet child pornography. In B. K. SchwartzEd., The sex offender (Vol. 7, pp. 6:1–6:11). New York, NY: Civic Research Institute. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Elliott, I. A. & Beech, A. R. (2009). Understanding online child pornography use: Applying sexual offense theory to Internet offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.03.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliott, I. A., Beech, A. R. & Mandeville-Norden, R. (2013). The psychological profiles of Internet, contact, and mixed Internet/contact sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063212439426 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York, NY: Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gillespie, S. M., Bailey, A., Squire, T., Carey, M. L., Eldridge, H. J. & Beech, A. R. (2016). An evaluation of a community-based psycho-educational program for users of child sexual exploitation material. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/1079063216639591 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goller, A., Graf, M., Frei, A. & Dittmann, V. (2010). PW01–117–Recidivism of Internet sex offenders – An epidemiological study on more than 4600 offenders in Switzerland. European Psychiatry, 25(Suppl. 1), 1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(10)71516-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graf, M. & Dittmann, V. (2011). Forensic-psychiatric treatment for Internet sex offenders. In D. P. BoerR. EherL. A. CraigM. H. MinerF. PfäfflinEds., International perspectives on the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 479–488). West Sussex, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Grubin, D. (2014, May). What polygraphy can tell us about risk in Internet offenders. Paper presented at the OnlineProtect Conference Looking Is Not as Bad as Touching – or is it? Considering Risk in Offenders Who Use Child Sexual Exploitation Material on Child Sexual Exploitation Material Offending, London, UK. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Grundmann, D., Krupp, J., Scherner, G., Amelung, T. & Beier, K. M. (2016). Stability of self-reported arousal to sexual fantasies involving children in a clinical sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1153–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0729-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L. & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809338545 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., McGrath, R., Kroner, D., D’Amora, D. A., Thomas, S. S. & Tavarez, L. P. (2017). A five-level risk and needs system: Maximizing assessment results in corrections through the development of a common language. New York, NY: The Council of State Governments Justice Center. Retrieved from https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/A-Five-Level-Risk-and-Needs-System_Report.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K. & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.66.2.348 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T.-L. & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada. User Report, Corrections Research. Retrieved from www.ps-sp.gc.ca/res/cor/rep First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K., Helmus, M. L. & Harris, A. J. (2015). Assessing the risk and needs of supervised sexual offenders: A prospective study using STABLE-2007, Static-99R, and Static-2002R. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 1205–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815602094 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K. & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K. & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K., Thornton, D., Helmus, L. M. & Babchishin, K. M. (2016). What sexual recidivism rates are associated with Static-99R and Static-2002R scores? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 218–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215574710 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harris, A. J. R. & Hanson, R. K. (2004). La récidive sexuelle: D’une simplicité trompeuse [Sex offender recidivism: A simple question] (Rapport pour spécialistes 2004–03). Ottawa, ON: Sécurité publique et protection civile Canada. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Babchishin, K. M. & Mann, R. E. (2013). Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012462244 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Helmus, L., Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K. & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211409951 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henshaw, M., Ogloff, J. R. & Clough, J. A. (2015). Looking beyond the screen: A critical review of the literature on the online child pornography offender. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29, 416–445. https://doi.org/1079063215603690 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hermann, C. A. & Nunes, K. L. (2016). Implicit and explicit evaluations of sexual aggression predict subsequent sexually aggressive behavior in a sample of community men. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216682952 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Howard, P. D. (2017). The effect of sample heterogeneity and risk categorization on area under the curve predictive validity metrics. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 103–120. https://doi.org/0093854816678899 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Howitt, D. & Sheldon, K. (2007). The role of cognitive distortions in paedophilic offending: Internet and contact offenders compared. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13, 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160601060564 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Imhoff, R. & Schmidt, A. F. (2014). Sexual disinhibition under sexual arousal: Evidence for domain specificity in men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1123–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0329-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kettleborough, D. G. & Merdian, H. L. (2016). Gateway to offending behaviour: Permission-giving thoughts of online users of child sexual exploitation material. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1231852 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, V., Schmidt, A. F., Turner, D. & Briken, P. (2015). Are sex drive and hypersexuality associated with pedophilic interest and child sexual abuse in a male community sample? PLoS One, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139533 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhle, L. F., Neutze, J., Amelung, D., Grundmann, G., Scherner, A., Konrad, G. A., … Beier, K. M. (2012, September). Treatment-change in child pornography offending in pedophiles and hebephiles in the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld. Paper presented at the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders, Berlin, Germany. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0028 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loewenstein, G., Nagin, D. & Paternoster, R. (1997). The effect of sexual arousal on predictions of sexual forcefulness. Journal of Crime and Delinquency, 32, 443–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427897034004003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Long, M., Alison, L., Tejeiro, R., Hendricks, E. & Giles, S. (2016). KIRAT: Law enforcement’s prioritization tool for investigating indecent image offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000069 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lovibond, P. F. & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Magaletta, P. R., Faust, E., Bickart, W. & McLearen, A. M. (2014). Exploring clinical and personality characteristics of adult male Internet-only child pornography offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12465271 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Merdian, H. L., Curtis, C., Thakker, J., Wilson, N. & Boer, D. P. (2014). The endorsement of cognitive distortions: Comparing child pornography offenders and contact sex offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 971–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.902454 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Merdian, H. L., Gresswell, D. M. & Craig, L. (2017). Considering parental risk in parenting (child custody) evaluation cases involving child sexual exploitation material. In L. DixonD. PerkinsL. A. CraigC. Hamilton-GiachritsisEds., What works in child protection: An evidence-based approach to assessment and intervention in care proceedings (pp. 258–277). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Merdian, H. L., Moghaddam, N., Boer, D. P., Wilson, N., Thakker, J., Curtis, C. & Dawson, D. (2016). Fantasy-driven versus contact-driven users of child sexual exploitation material offender classification and implications for their risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/1079063216641109 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mews, A., Di Bella, L. & Purver, M. (2017). Impact evaluation of the prison-based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme. London, UK: Ministry of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/623876/sotp-report-web.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Middleton, D. (2008). From research to practice: The development of the Internet sex offender treatment programme (i-SOTP). Irish Probation Journal, 5, 49–64. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Middleton, D. & Hayes, E. (2006). Internet Sex Offender Treatment Programme theory manual. London, UK: National Offender Management Service (NOMS) Interventions Unit, Ministry of Justice. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Middleton, D., Mandeville-Norden, R. & Hayes, E. (2009). Does treatment work with Internet sex offenders? Emerging findings from the Internet Sex Offender Treatment Programme (i-SOTP). Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600802673444 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • NetClean. (2016). The NetClean Report 2016. Ten important insights about child sexual abuse. Retrieved from https://www.netclean.com/the-netclean-report-2016/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neutze, J., Grundmann, D., Amelung, T., Kuhle, L. F., Scherner, G., Konrad, A. & Schaefer, G. A. (2012, September). Treatment change in dynamic risk factors in the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld. Paper presented at the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders Conference, Berlin, Germany. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nordgren, L. F. & Chou, E. Y. (2011). The push and pull of temptation: The bidirectional influence of temptation on self-control. Psychological Science, 22, 1386–1390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418349 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunes, K. L., Hermann, C. A., White, K., Pettersen, C. & Bumby, K. (2016). Attitude may be everything, but is everything an attitude? Cognitive distortions may not be evaluations of rape. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215625489 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nunes, K. L., Pettersen, C., Hermann, C. A., Looman, J. & Spape, J. (2016). Does change on the MOLEST and RAPE Scales predict sexual recidivism? Sexual Abuse, 28, 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214540725 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ó Ciardha, C. & Gannon, T. A. (2011). The cognitive distortions of child molesters are in need of treatment. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.05.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quayle, E. & Taylor, M. (2002). Child pornography and the Internet: Perpetuating a cycle of abuse. Deviant Behavior, 23, 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620290086413 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quayle, E. & Taylor, M. (2003). Child pornography: An Internet crime. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Quinsey, V. L. (1986). Men who have sex with children. In D. N. WeisstubEd., Law and mental health: International perspectives (pp. 140–172). New York, NY: Pergamon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ray, J. V., Kimonis, E. R. & Seto, M. C. (2013). Correlates and moderators of child pornography consumption in a community sample. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26, 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213502678 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schulz, T., Palmer, S., Stolpmann, G., Wernicke, M. & Müller, J. L. (2017). Presenting a treatment concept for people with a self-reported sexual interest in children in an outpatient setting. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpsych.2017.71001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9882-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. (2013). Internet sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. (2017). The motivation-facilitation model of sexual offending. Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.177/1079063217720919 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. & Ahmed, A. G. (2014). Treatment and management of child pornography use. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 37, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2014.03.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M. & Blanchard, R. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. & Eke, A. W. (2005). The criminal histories and later offending of child pornography offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-005-4605-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. & Eke, A. W. (2015). Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offender: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Law and Human Behavior, 39, 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000128 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. & Eke, A. W. (2017). Correlates of admitted sexual interest in children among individuals convicted of child pornography offenses. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000240 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C., Hanson, R. K. & Babchishin, K. M. (2011). Contact sexual offending by men with online sexual offences. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 124–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210369013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seto, M. C., Stephens, S., Lalumière, M. L. & Cantor, J. M. (2015). The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI–2): Development and criterion-related validation. Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/1079063215612444 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shingler, J. (2009). Managing intrusive risky thoughts: What works? Journal of Sexual Aggresssion, 15, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600802542011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skakoon-Sparling, S. & Cramer, K. M. (2016). The impact of sexual arousal on elements of sexual decision making: Sexual self-restraint, motivational state, and self-control. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 25, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.252-A1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smid, W., Schepers, K., Kamphuis, J. H., van Linden, S. & Bartling, S. (2015). Prioritizing child pornography notifications: predicting direct victimization. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27, 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213514453 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thornton, D. & Knight, R. A. (2015). Construction and validation of SRA-FV need assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27, 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213511120 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C. & Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. In R. A. PrentkyE. S. JanusM. C. SetoEds., Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 989. Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (pp. 225–235). New York, NY: Academy of Sciences. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wakeling, H. C., Howard, P. & Barnett, G. (2011). Comparing the validity of the RM2000 scales and OGRS3 for predicting recidivism by Internet sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210375974 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ward, T. & Beech, A. (2006). An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Webb, L., Craissati, J. & Keen, S. (2007). Characteristics of Internet child pornography offenders: A comparison with child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9063-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winder, B., Gough, B. & Seymour-Smith, S. (2015). Stumbling into sexual crime: The passive perpetrator in accounts by male Internet sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0302-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wolak, J. (2011, November). Child pornography possessors: Trends in offender and case characteristics. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Toronto, ON. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar