Abstract
Abstract. The following points emerge from the present review of strategies to improve the learning of proper names: (a) Face-name mnemonic techniques based on mental imagery have been shown to be efficient in laboratory settings in both young and older adults. Unfortunately, they are particularly effortful and require capacity for imagination, making them difficult to apply in a real conversational context. (b) Strategies based on spaced retrieval practice have been found to be efficient both in laboratory and more ecological settings, and both in young and older adults. (c) Techniques based on spaced retrieval practice appear to be more efficient than those based on mental imagery. (d) More recent research has proposed new perspectives, such as basing learning strategies on implicit, rather than explicit, memory processes such as hyper-binding. Finally, neuroscience research has started to investigate the possibility of using non-invasive electrical brain stimulation to improve name learning.
References
1996). Proper names and definite descriptions with the same reference: A pragmatic choice for language users. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00103-0
(1996). Using a memory handbook to improve everyday memory in community-dwelling older adults with memory complaints. Experimental Aging Research, 22, 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610739608254013
(1998). Dissociation between proper name and common noun learning. Brain and Cognition, 37, 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0987
(2018). Leveraging older adults’ susceptibility to distraction to improve memory for face-name associations. Psychology and Aging, 33, 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000192
(1975).
(Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena . In R. L. SolsoEd., Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.2011). Putting the pieces together: The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in relational memory encoding. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21459
(2017). The cognitive psychology and neuroscience of naming people. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.008
(1993). Spontaneous mnemonic strategies used by older and younger adults to remember proper names. Memory, 1, 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658219308258245
(2010). Hyper-binding: A unique age effect. Psychological Science, 21, 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359910
(2012). Facing facts: Can the face-name mnemonic strategy accommodate additional factual information. Learning, Instruction, and Cognition, 80, 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.630431
(2014). Learning more about with the face-name mnemonic strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 569–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3036
(1997). The face-name mnemonic strategy from a different perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0940
(2005). Applications of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1101
(2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268–276. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193405
(1994). Age-related problems in the use of proper names in communication. In M. L. HummertJ. M. WiemannJ. F. Nussbaum (Eds.), Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary theory and research (pp. 40–57). London, UK: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326832.n3
(1990). Name recall performance across the adult life-span. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02365.x
(1996). Expanding understanding of the expanding pattern-of-retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.2.4.365
(2007). Person reference in interaction: linguistic, cultural and social perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2010). How name descriptiveness impacts proper name learning in young and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 17, 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580903477245
(1973). Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall. Memory & Cognition, 1, 213–216. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198098
(1990). Cognitive interventions to improve face-name recall: The role of personality traits differences. Developmental Psychology, 26, 889–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.889
(2010). Retrieving personal names, referring expressions, and terms of address. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 53, 345–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(10)53009-3
(2014).
(Retrieval failures for names of familiar people . In B. L. SchwartzA. S. BrownEds., Tip-of-the-tongue states and related phenomena (pp. 50–74). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547383.0041982). Effectiveness of face-name strategies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 167–170. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1982.54.1.167
(2008). Retrieval opportunities while multitasking improve name recall. Memory, 16, 896–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802360611
(2004). Meeting Mister Farmer versus meeting a farmer: Specific effects of aging on learning proper names. Psychology and Aging, 19, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.3.515
(2012). Searching for interference effects in learning new face-name associations. Memory, 20, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.649290
(1978).
(Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning . In M. M. GrunebergP. E. MorrisR. N. SykesEds., Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625–632). London, UK: Academic Press.2017). Transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during encoding improves recall but not recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 106, 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.022
(1958). How to develop a super-power memory. Preston, NJ: Thomas.
(2012). Self control of when and how much to test face-name pairs in a novel spaced retrieval paradigm: An examination of age-related differences. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 620–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2011.640658
(2015). Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on associative memory. Brain Research, 1624, 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.07.036
(1980). Investigation of a visual imagery mnemonic device for acquiring face-name associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.145
(2014). The testing effect. In Perfect, T. J.Lindsay, D. S. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of applied memory (pp. 183–200). London, UK: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294703.n11
(1977). Levels of processing versus transfer-appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9
(2000). The name game: Using retrieval practice to improve the learning of names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.6.2.124
(2002). The improved name game: Better use of expanding retrieval practice. Memory, 10, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000371
(2004). The name game: Acceptability, bonus information and group size. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.948
(2005). Strategies for learning proper names: Expanding retrieval practice, meaning and imagery. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 779–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1115
(1978). An imagery mnemonic for the learning of names. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1978.tb01663.x
(2005). Comparison of the efficacy of two name-learning techniques: Expanding rehearsal and face-name imagery. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 79–102. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/30039044
(2016).
(Names and naming . In C. HoughEd., The Oxford handbook of names and naming (pp. 39–51). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.262012). Age differences in memory for names: The effect of prelearned semantic associations. Psychology and Aging, 27, 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025194
(1994). Testing the efficacy of name mnemonics used during conversation. Psychological Reports, 75, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.131
(2015). Guess who? Investigating the proper name processing networks by means of tDCS. Neuropsychologia, 66, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.025
(2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
(2011). Naming with proper names: The left temporal pole theory. Behavioural Neurology, 24, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.3233/BEN-2011-0338
(1986). Long-term efficacy of cognitive training for Age-Associated Memory Impairment: A six month follow-up study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2, 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565648609540358
(2016). Face-name learning in older adults: A benefit of hyper-binding. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23, 1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1003-z
(2011). Testing protects against proactive interference in face-name learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 518–523. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0085-x
(1984). The effects of a face-name mnemonic in young, middle-aged and elderly adults. Experimental Aging Research, 10, 55–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610738408258543
(1983). Interactive imagery and affective judgments improve face-name learning in the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/38.2.197
(1990). Learning mnemonics: Roles of aging and subtle cognitive impairment. Psychology and Aging, 5, 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.133
(