Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Articles and Reviews

The Human Right to Make One’s Own Choices – Implications for Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia

A Systematic Review

Published Online:June 14, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000372

Abstract

Abstract. Autonomy is a human right and implies the “freedom to make one’s own choices.” The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN-CRPD) is a human rights treaty granting persons with disabilities, such as persons with dementia (PwD), legal capacity regardless of their impairments. State parties and healthcare practitioners (HCP) are obliged to enable PwD to make decisions with legal effect. The UN-CRPD does not specify the nature of support, thus, the implementation of supported decision-making (SDM) remains unclear. The objective of this review is to compile empirical support strategies for decision-making in dementia and address the specific needs of PwD. Using search terms related to “dementia,” “decision-making,” and “support,” we conducted a systematic review (following PRISMA guidelines) and searched MEDLINE and PsycINFO for empirical studies. References were cross-referenced. Information on support strategies was extracted, summarized, and thematically categorized to provide an overview of international literature on SDM in dementia. Initially, we found 2,348 articles. Thirty-five full-text articles were screened for eligibility (criteria followed PICOS model), 11 of which met the inclusion criteria. Strategies to support decision-making in PwD were categorized according to approach. Support began either with the individual and his/her specific abilities or with the social, spatial, and procedure-oriented environment. As the first systematic review on SDM for PwD, this article contributes to the implementation of SDM in practice. Despite heterogeneous evidence, the findings have crucial implications for HCP on how to enable PwD to exercise their human right to make decisions with legal effect.

References

  • Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (2017). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. Retrieved from https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Black, B. S., Kass, N. E., Fogarty, L. A., & Rabins, P. V. (2007). Informed Consent for Dementia Research: The Study Enrollment Encounter. Ethics & Human Research, 29, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.009 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Black, B. S., Wechsler, M., & Fogarty, L. (2013). Decision making for participation in dementia research. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boyle, G. (2013). “She’s usually quicker than the calculator”: Financial management and decision-making in couples living with dementia. Health & Social Care in the Community, 21, 554–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12044 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bronner, K., Perneczky, R., McCabe, R., Kurz, A., & Hamann, J. (2016). Which medical and social decision topics are important after early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease from the perspectives of people with Alzheimer’s Disease, spouses and professionals? BMC Research Notes, 9, 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1960-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2014). General comments No. 1 (2014). Article 12: Equal recognition before the law. Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/031/20/PDF/G1403120.pdf?OpenElement First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Boer, M. E., Hertogh, C. M., Dröes, R.-M., Riphagen, I. I., Jonker, C., & Eefsting, J. A. (2007). Suffering from dementia – the patient’s perspective: A review of the literature. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 1021–1039. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610207005765 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dunn, L. B., & Jeste, D. V. (2001). Enhancing informed consent for research and treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology, 24, 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00218-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eyler, L. T., & Jeste, D. V. (2006). Enhancing the informed consent process: A conceptual overview. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24, 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.691 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feinberg, L. F., & Whitlatch, C. J. (2002). Decision-making for persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 17, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/153331750201700406 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fetherstonhaugh, D., Tarzia, L., Bauer, M., Nay, R., & Beattie, E. (2016). “The red dress or the blue?”: How do staff perceive that they support decision making for people with dementia living in residential aged care facilities? Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 35, 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464814531089 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fetherstonhaugh, D., Tarzia, L., & Nay, R. (2013). Being central to decision making means I am still here! The essence of decision making for people with dementia. Journal of Aging Studies, 27, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2012.12.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fields, L. M., & Calvert, J. D. (2015). Informed consent procedures with cognitively impaired patients: A review of ethics and best practices. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 69, 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12289 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Flory, J., & Emanuel, E. (2004). Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. JAMA, 292, 1593–1601. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.13.1593 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Groen van de Ven, L., Smits, C., Elwyn, G., Span, M., Jukema, J., Eefsting, J., & Vernooij-Dassen, M. (2017). Recognizing decision needs: First step for collaborative deliberation in dementia care networks. Patient Education and Counseling, 100, 1329–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.024 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Groen van de Ven, L., Smits, C., Oldewarris, K., Span, M., Jukema, J., Eefsting, J., & Vernooij-Dassen, M. (2017). Decision trajectories in dementia care networks: Decisions and related key events. Research on Aging, 39, 1039–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027516656741 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haberstroh, J., Müller, T., Knebel, M., Kaspar, R., Oswald, F., & Pantel, J. (2014). Can the mini-mental state examination predict capacity to consent to treatment? GeroPsych, 27, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000113 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Hamann, J., Bronner, K., Margull, J., Mendel, R., Diehl-Schmid, J., Bühner, M., ... Perneczky, R. (2011). Patient participation in medical and social decisions in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59, 2045–2052. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03661.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hirschman, K. B., Joyce, C. M., James, B. D., Xie, S. X., & Karlawish, J. H. T. (2005). Do Alzheimer’s disease patients want to participate in a treatment decision, and would their caregivers let them? The Gerontologist, 45, 381–388. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horton-Deutsch, S., Twigg, P., & Evans, R. (2007). Health care decision-making of persons with dementia. Dementia, 6, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301207075643 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Karlawish, J., Kim, S. Y. H., Knopman, D., van Dyck, C. H., James, B. D., & Marson, D. (2008). The views of Alzheimer disease patients and their study partners on proxy consent for clinical trial. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e318162992d First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, S. Y. H., Karlawish, J. H. T., & Caine, E. D. (2002). Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10, 151–165. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kitwood, T. M.Herrmann, M.Müller-Hergl, C.Eds. (2008). Demenz: Der person-zentrierte Ansatz im Umgang mit verwirrten Menschen [Dementia reconsidered – The person comes first] (5th ed.). Bern, Switzerland: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Knebel, M., Haberstroh, J., Kuemmel, A., Pantel, J., & Schröder, J. (2015). CODEMamb – an observational communication behavior assessment tool for use in ambulatory dementia care. Aging & Mental Health, 20, 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1075959 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kohn, N. A., & Blumenthal, J. A. (2014). A critical assessment of supported decision-making for persons aging with intellectual disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 7, 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.03.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kuemmel, A., Haberstroh, J., & Pantel, J. (2014). CODEM Instrument. Developing a Tool to Assess Communication Behavior in Dementia. GeroPsych, 27, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000100 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Lord, K., Livingston, G., Robertson, S., & Cooper, C. (2016). How people with dementia and their families decide about moving to a care home and support their needs: Development of a decision aid, a qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics, 16, 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0242-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marson, D. C., Ingram, K. K., Cody, H. A., & Harrell, L. E. (1995). Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer’s disease under different legal standards. A prototype instrument. Archives of Neurology, 52, 949–954. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marson, D. C., Schmitt, F. A., Ingram, K. K., & Harrell, L. E. (1994). Determining the competency of Alzheimer patients to consent to treatment and research. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 8, 5–18. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Menne, H. L., & Whitlatch, C. J. (2007). Decision-making involvement of individuals with dementia. The Gerontologist, 47, 810–819. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mittal, D., Palmer, B. W., Dunn, L. B., Landes, R., Ghormley, C., Beck, C., … Jeste, D. V. (2007). Comparison of two enhanced consent procedures for patients with mild Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e31802dd379 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moore, T. F., & Hollett, J. (2003). Giving voice to persons living with dementia: The researcher’s opportunities and challenges. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318403251793251793 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moye, J., Karel, M. J., Gurrera, R. J., & Azar, A. R. (2006). Neuropsychological predictors of decision-making capacity over 9 months in mild-to-moderate dementia. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00288.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Murphy, J., & Oliver, T. (2013). The use of Talking Mats to support people with dementia and their carers to make decisions together. Health & Social Care in the Community, 21, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Palmer, B. W., Dunn, L. B., Appelbaum, P. S., Mudaliar, S., Thal, L., Henry, R., … Jeste, D. V. (2005). Assessment of capacity to consent to research among older persons with schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, or diabetes mellitus: Comparison of a 3-item questionnaire with a comprehensive standardized capacity instrument. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 726–733. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.726 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rubright, J., Sankar, P., Casarett, D. J., Gur, R., Xie, S. X., & Karlawish, J. (2010). A memory and organizational aid improves Alzheimer disease research consent capacity: Results of a randomized, controlled trial. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181dd1c3b First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Samsi, K., & Manthorpe, J. (2013). Everyday decision-making in dementia: Findings from a longitudinal interview study of people with dementia and family carers. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213000306 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smebye, K. L., Kirkevold, M., & Engedal, K. (2012). How do persons with dementia participate in decision making related to health and daily care? A multi-case study. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 241. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-241 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Span, M., Smits, C., Jukema, J., Groen van de Ven, L., Janssen, R., Vernooij-Dassen, M., Eefsting, J., & Hettinga, M. (2015). An Interactive Web Tool for facilitating shared decision-making in Dementia-Care Networks: A field study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, 128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00128 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trachsel, M., Hermann, H., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2015). Cognitive fluctuations as a challenge for the assessment of decision-making capacity in patients with dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 30, 360–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317514539377 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tyrrell, J., Genin, N., & Myslinski, M. (2006). Freedom of choice and decision-making in health and social care. Dementia, 5, 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301206069915 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • UN-CRPD. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations 2006 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Von Kutzleben, M., Schmid, W., Halek, M., Holle, B., & Bartholomeyczik, S. (2012). Community-dwelling persons with dementia: What do they need? What do they demand? What do they do? A systematic review on the subjective experiences of persons with dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.614594 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Webb, R., & Dening, K. H. (2016). In whose best interests? A case study of a family affected by dementia. British Journal of Community Nursing, 21, 300–304. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.6.300 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilkinson, H. (2001). Empowerment and decision-making for people with dementia: The use of legal interventions in Scotland. Aging & Mental Health, 5, 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860120080260 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar