Religiosity’s Nomological Network and Temporal Change
Introducing an Extensive Country-Level Religiosity Index based on Gallup World Poll Data
Abstract
Abstract. Countries differ in their religiosity and these differences have been found to moderate numerous psychological effects. The burgeoning research in this area creates a demand for a country-level religiosity index that is comparable across a large number of countries. Here, we offer such an index, which covers 166 countries and rests on representative data from 1,619,300 participants of the Gallup World Poll. Moreover, we validate the novel index, use it to examine temporal change in worldwide religiosity over the last decade, and present a comprehensive analysis of country-level religiosity’s nomological network. The main results are as follows. First, the index was found to be a valid index of global religiosity. Second, country-level religiosity modestly increased between 2006 and 2011 and modestly decreased between 2011 and 2017 – demonstrating a curvilinear pattern. Finally, nomological network analysis revealed three things: it buttressed past evidence that religious countries are economically less developed; it clarified inconsistencies in the literature on the health status of inhabitants from religious countries, suggesting that their psychological and physical health tends to be particularly good once economic development is accounted for; and finally, it shed initial light on the associations between country-level religiosity and various psychological dimensions of culture (i.e., Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and country-level Big Five traits). These associations revealed that religious countries are primarily characterized by high levels of communion (i.e., collectivism and agreeableness). We are optimistic that the newly presented country-level religiosity index can satisfy the fast-growing demand for an accurate and comprehensive global religiosity index.
References
2014).
(Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model . In J. M. OlsonM. P. ZannaEds., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 195–255). Waltham, MA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-72011). A cross-national test of the uncertainty hypothesis of religious belief. Cross-Cultural Research, 45, 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397111402465
(2013). Country religiosity declines as material security increases. Cross-Cultural Research, 47, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397112463328
(2003). Religion and economic growth across countries. American Sociological Review, 68, 760–781. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519761
(1988). Studying contextual effects on political behavior. American Politics Research, 16, 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/004478088016002005
(2007). Religion as culture: Religious individualism and collectivism among American Catholics, Jews, and Protestants. Journal of Personality, 75, 709–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00454.x
(2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9, 361. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015952
(1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
(2013). Two happiness puzzles. American Economic Review, 103, 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.591
(2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018066
(2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1278–1290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024402
(2004). An introduction to latent growth curve modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35, 333–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80042-X
(2012). A cultural sociology of religion: New directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145424
(2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000021
(2013). Religious participation, social conservatism, and human development. The Journal of Politics, 75, 1125–1141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000765
(2014). Cross-cultural variations in Big Five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1064–1091. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037683
(2012). Big Two personality and Big Three mate preferences: Similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1579–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212456300
(2012). The need to belong can motivate belief in God. Journal of Personality, 80, 465–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00730.x
(2013). The psychological benefits of income are contingent on individual-level and culture-level religiosity. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 569–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612469819
(2013). Big Two personality and religiosity across cultures: Communals as religious conformists and agentics as religious contrarians. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612442553
(2012). Religiosity, social self-esteem, and psychological adjustment: On the cross-cultural specificity of the psychological benefits of religiosity. Psychological Science, 23, 158–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427045
(2017). Christian self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 786–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000140
(2017). The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, e18–e39. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000104
(2015). Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 526–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000052
(2008). After secularization? Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134740
(1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
(2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(Inglehart, R.Haerpfer, C.Moreno, A.Welzel, C.Kizilova, K.Diez-Medrano, J.Puranen, B. (Eds.). (2014). World values survey: Round six – country-pooled datafile 2010–2014. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp
2015). GBD compare data visualization. Seattle, WA: IHME, University of Washington. Retrieved from http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare
. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
(2018). Optimal human functioning around the world: A new index of eudaimonic well-being in 166 nations. British Journal of Psychology, 109, 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12316.
(2019). Cultural religiosity as the moderator of the relationship between affective experience and life satisfaction: A study in 147 countries. Emotion, 19, 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000469
(2010). Religious belief as compensatory control. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309353750
(2017). Legatum Prosperity Index 2017: Methodology report. Retrieved from http://www.prosperity.com
. (2000). Integrating person‐centered and variable‐centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x
(2017). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
(1997). Tolerance of suicide, religion and suicide rates: An ecological and individual study in 19 Western countries. Psychological Medicine, 27, 1165–1171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291797005357
(2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894862
(2014). Residents of poor nations have a greater sense of meaning in life than residents of wealthy nations. Psychological Science, 25, 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613507286
(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
(2008). Latent growth curve modeling. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984737
(2009). Is personal insecurity a cause of cross-national differences in the intensity of religious belief? Journal of Religion and Society, 11, 1–24.
(2009). Expanding the g-nexus: Further evidence regarding the relations among national IQ, religiosity and national health outcomes. Intelligence, 37, 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.06.003
(2010). Statewide differences in personality: Toward a psychological geography of the United States. American Psychologist, 65, 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018194
(2008). A theory of the emergence, persistence, and expression of geographic variation in psychological characteristics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 339–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00084.x
(2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
(2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five-factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352322
(2014). Religion, personality, and social behavior. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2010). Why does religiosity persist? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352323
(2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309351002
(1999). Recent developments and current controversies in the sociology of religion. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.363
(1983). The effect of religious commitment on suicide: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 362–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136402
(1994). A supply-side reinterpretation of the “secularization” of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 230–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386688
(1982). Statistical inference in contextual analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 151–175. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110845
(1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
(2013). Climato-economic habitats support patterns of human needs, stresses, and freedoms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002828
(1993). Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1044–1093. https://doi.org/10.1086/230139
(1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Scribner.
(2007).
(Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns . In M. MartinEd., The Cambridge companion to atheism (pp. 47–66). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521842700.004