Skip to main content
Original Article

Status Consciousness

A Preliminary Construction of a Scale Measuring Individual Differences in Status-Relevant Attitudes, Beliefs, and Desires

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000143

This research examined individual differences in how people think about social status via a scale with eight proposed factors. Items designed to measure these factors were administered to an online sample (n = 1,009). A factor analysis revealed eight meaningful factors: rejection of status, high-perceived status, respect for hierarchy, low-perceived status, status display, egalitarianism, belief in hierarchy, and enjoyment of status. The 40 items forming these eight factors were then administered to a new sample of online participants (n = 303) alongside measures of self-esteem, social dominance orientation, competitiveness, assertiveness, social comparison orientation, narcissism, and hypersensitive narcissism. Confirmatory factor analyses from this subsequent study supported the model derived in the first study. A preliminary analysis of the construct validity of this new “Status Consciousness Scale” scale was undertaken by examining the correlations between the factors and other personality variables that were predicted to relate to each factor.

References

  • Akhtar, S. (2000). The shy narcissist. In J. Sandler R. Michels P. FonagyEds., Changing ideas in a changing world: The revolution in psychoanalysis – essays in honour of Arnold Cooper. New York, NY: Karnac. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C., John, O. P. , Keltner, D., Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 116–132. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C. , Kilduff, G. J. (2009a). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C. , Kilduff, G. J. (2009b). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 96, 491–503. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychiatric Association . (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Arlington, TX: American Psychiatric Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barkow, J. H. (1980). Prestige and self-esteem: A biosocial interpretation. In D. R. Omark F. F. Strayer D. G. FreedmanEds., Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction (pp. 319–322). New York, NY: Garland STPM Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, sex, and status: Biological approaches to mind and culture. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berger, J. , Cohen, B. P., Zelditch, M. Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, D. M. (2008). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (3rd ed.). Boston, MD: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cummins, D. (2006). Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. In D. M. In Buss, (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 676–697). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Faris, R. , & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76, 48–73. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S. , Zuroff, D. C. (2002). Social rank strategies in hierarchical relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 425–433. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, F. X., Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129–142. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Bellew, R., Mills, A. , Gale, C. (2009). The dark side of competition: How competitive behaviour and striving to avoid inferiority are linked to depression, anxiety, stress and self-harm. Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 82, 123–136. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W. , Hogan, R. , Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R. , Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hawley, P. H. (2002). Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 167–176. doi: 10.1080/01650250042000726 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hendin, H. M., Cheek, J. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray’s Narcism Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 588–599. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Houston, J., Harris, P. , McIntire, S. , Francis, D. (2002). Revising the Competitiveness Index using factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 90, 31–34. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kalma, A. (1991). Hierarchisation and dominance assessment at first glance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 165–181. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H. , Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lease, A. M., Musgrove, K. T. , Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Dimensions of social status in Preadolescent Peer Groups: Likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Social Development, 11, 508–533. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00213 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lovaglia, M. , Houser, J. (1996). Emotional reactions and status in groups. American Sociological Review, 61, 867–883. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mast, M. S. (2010). Interpersonal behaviour and social perception in a hierarchy: The interpersonal power and behaviour model. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 1–33. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2010.486942 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pratto, F. , Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. , Malle, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raskin, R. , & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ridgeway, C. , Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79–93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Savin-Williams, R. C. (1979). Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents. Child Development, 50, 923–935. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zuroff, D. C., Fournier, M. A. , Patall, E. A., Leybman, M. J. (2010). Steps toward an evolutionary personality psychology: Individual differences in the social rank domain. Canadian Psychology, 51, 58–66. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zwick, W. R., Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar