Status Consciousness
A Preliminary Construction of a Scale Measuring Individual Differences in Status-Relevant Attitudes, Beliefs, and Desires
Abstract
This research examined individual differences in how people think about social status via a scale with eight proposed factors. Items designed to measure these factors were administered to an online sample (n = 1,009). A factor analysis revealed eight meaningful factors: rejection of status, high-perceived status, respect for hierarchy, low-perceived status, status display, egalitarianism, belief in hierarchy, and enjoyment of status. The 40 items forming these eight factors were then administered to a new sample of online participants (n = 303) alongside measures of self-esteem, social dominance orientation, competitiveness, assertiveness, social comparison orientation, narcissism, and hypersensitive narcissism. Confirmatory factor analyses from this subsequent study supported the model derived in the first study. A preliminary analysis of the construct validity of this new “Status Consciousness Scale” scale was undertaken by examining the correlations between the factors and other personality variables that were predicted to relate to each factor.
References
2000). The shy narcissist. In J. Sandler R. Michels P. FonagyEds., Changing ideas in a changing world: The revolution in psychoanalysis – essays in honour of Arnold Cooper. New York, NY: Karnac.
(2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 116–132.
(2009a). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x
(2009b). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 96, 491–503.
(2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Arlington, TX: American Psychiatric Publishing.
. (1980). Prestige and self-esteem: A biosocial interpretation. In D. R. Omark F. F. Strayer D. G. FreedmanEds., Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction (pp. 319–322). New York, NY: Garland STPM Press.
(1989). Darwin, sex, and status: Biological approaches to mind and culture. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
(1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255.
(2008). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (3rd ed.). Boston, MD: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
(2006). Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. In , The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 676–697). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
(2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76, 48–73.
(2002). Social rank strategies in hierarchical relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 425–433.
(1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129–142.
(2009). The dark side of competition: How competitive behaviour and striving to avoid inferiority are linked to depression, anxiety, stress and self-harm. Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 82, 123–136.
(2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.
(2002). Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 167–176. doi: 10.1080/01650250042000726
(1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray’s Narcism Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 588–599.
(2002). Revising the Competitiveness Index using factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 90, 31–34.
(1991). Hierarchisation and dominance assessment at first glance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 165–181.
(2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
(2002). Dimensions of social status in Preadolescent Peer Groups: Likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Social Development, 11, 508–533. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00213
(1996). Emotional reactions and status in groups. American Sociological Review, 61, 867–883.
(2010). Interpersonal behaviour and social perception in a hierarchy: The interpersonal power and behaviour model. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 1–33. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2010.486942
(1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
(1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.
(1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79–93.
(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(1979). Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents. Child Development, 50, 923–935.
(2010). Steps toward an evolutionary personality psychology: Individual differences in the social rank domain. Canadian Psychology, 51, 58–66.
(1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432.
(