Skip to main content
Original Article

The Dark Side of Tinder

The Dark Triad of Personality as Correlates of Tinder Use

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000297

Abstract. Tinder is the leading online dating application. This study (N = 271) explored the Dark Triad personality traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) and sociosexuality as correlates of Tinder use. The results revealed that Tinder users had higher scores on the Dark Triad traits and sociosexuality, compared to non-users. Also, Tinder users with higher scores on the Dark Triad traits and sociosexuality significantly showed greater motivation to use Tinder for short-term mating; however, there was no significant relation with Tinder use and motivation for long-term mating. This finding supports the idea that Tinder can be a new venue for people high on the Dark Triad to pursue their short-term mating strategies.

References

  • Barelds, D. P., Dijkstra, P., Groothof, H. A., & Pastoor, C. D. (2017). The Dark Triad and three types of jealousy: Its’ relations among heterosexuals and homosexuals involved in a romantic relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baughman, H. M., Jonason, P. K., Veselka, L., & Vernon, P. A. (2014). Four shades of sexual fantasies linked to the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.034 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Botnen, E. O., Bendixen, M., Grøntvedt, T. V., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2018). Individual differences in sociosexuality predict picture-based mobile dating app use. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.021 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, G., Bennett, C., Davidson, L., Ireen, A., Phipps, A. J., Stewart-Wilkes, D., & Wilson, B. (2018). Dark triad traits and romantic relationship attachment, accommodation, and control. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551914 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carpenter, C. J., & McEwan, B. (2016). The players of micro-dating: Individual and gender differences in goal orientations toward micro-dating apps. First Monday, 21. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i5.6187 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., & Kavanagh, P. (2010). The dark side of love: Love styles and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.030 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short‐term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., & Harbeson, C. L. (2011). Mate-selection and the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.025 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kagitcibasi, C. (2017). Doing psychology with a cultural lens: A half-century journey. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 824–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617700932 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kito, M., Yuki, M., & Thomson, R. (2017). Relational mobility and close relationships: A socioecological approach to explain cross‐cultural differences. Personal Relationships, 24, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12174 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LeFebvre, L. E. (2017). Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517706419 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rasmussen, K. R., & Boon, S. D. (2014). Romantic revenge and the Dark Triad: A model of impellance and inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.018 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., Cummings, C., & Felt, J. (2008). The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2124–2157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, D. P., Couden, A., & Baker, M. (2001). The effects of sex and temporal context on feelings of romantic desire: An experimental evaluation of sexual strategies theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sevi, B. (2018a). Brief report: Tinder users are risk takers and have low sexual disgust sensitivity. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0170-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sevi, B. (2018b). Hookup culture. In T. ShackelfordV. Weekes Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science, Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_217-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sevi, B., Aral, T., & Eskenazi, T. (2017). Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.053 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.026 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar