Abstract
False memories occur when individuals mistakenly report an event as having taken place when that event did not in fact occur. The DRM (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995) paradigm provides an effective technique for creating and investigating false memories. In this paradigm participants study a list of words (e.g., SOUR, CANDY,…) that are highly associated to a non-presented critical item (e.g., SWEET). The study phase is followed by a test of memory for the study list words. Researchers typically find very high levels of false recall of the critical non-presented item. However, the likelihood of falsely remembering the non-presented critical items can be reduced by presenting studied associates visually rather than auditorally (e.g., Smith & Hunt, 1998). This is referred to as the modality effect in false memory. The current study investigated the role of resource availability in the expression of this modality effect in false recall. In Experiment 1 false recall was reduced in the visual study presentation condition relative to the auditory condition for participants with higher working memory capacity, but not for participants with lower working memory capacity. In Experiment 2 the effect of study modality on false recall was eliminated by the addition of a divided attention task at encoding. Both studies support the proposal that resource availability plays a role in the expression of the modality effect in the DRM paradigm (Smith, Lozito, & Bayen, 2005).
References
(2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 1–15.
(2010). The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults’ false memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17, 129–159. doi: 10.1080/13825580903029715.
(2002). Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory. Memory, 10, 55–61. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000236.
(2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.
(1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.
(2006). Variations in processing resources and resistance to false memories in younger and older adults. Memory, 14, 692–711. doi: 10.1080/09658210600648456.
(2007). The effect of divided attention on false memory depends on how memory is tested. Memory & Cognition, 35, 660–667.
(2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 155–161.
(2002). Aging and strategic retrieval processes: Reducing false memories with distinctiveness heuristic. Psychology and Aging, 17, 405–415.
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
(2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 339–353. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.2.339.
(2003). The effects of associations and aging on illusory recollections. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1036–1044.
(1999). Separating habit and recollection in young and older adults: Effects of elaborative processing and distinctiveness. Psychology and Aging, 14, 122–134.
(2003). Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 811–825. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X (03) 00018-4.
(2006). The concept of distinctiveness in memory research. In , Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514.
(1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421–445.
(2006). Distinctiveness and memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(1996). Emotional focus and source monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 135–156.
(2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.
(2001). Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 913–919. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.4.913.
(1999). Reducing gist-based false recognition in older adults: Encoding and retrieval manipulations. Psychology and Aging, 14, 220–237.
(1983). Memory for spatial information in younger and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 19, 901–906.
(1992). Memory for pictorial information and the picture superiority effect. Educational Gerontology, 18, 213–223.
(1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories. Memory & Cognition, 25, 838–848.
(1990). Implicit and explicit memory and the automatic/effortful distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 71–80.
(2008). The corrective effects of warning on false memories in the DRM paradigm are limited to full attention conditions. Acta Psychologica, 129, 308–314. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.08.007.
(2005). The modality effect in false recognition: Evidence for test-based monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1407–1413.
(1996). From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 105–111.
(1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814.
(1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1–24.
(2003). “If I didn’t write it, why would I remember it?” Effects of encoding, attention, and practice on accurate and false memory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 445–457.
(2009). Illusory recollection in older adults and younger adults under divided attention. Psychology and Aging, 24, 211–216. doi: 10.1037/a0014177.
(1998). Presentation modality affects false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 710–715.
(2008). The effect of study modality on false recognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1439–1449. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.8.1439.
(2005). Adult age differences in distinctive processing: The modality effect on false recall. Psychology and Aging, 20, 486–492. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.486.
(1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.
(2003). The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 550–564.
(2005). Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 76–85. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.76
