Participant Sexual Orientation Matters
New Evidence on the Gender Bias in Face Recognition
Abstract
Research participants’ sexual orientation is not consistently taken into account in experimental psychological research. We argue that it should be in any research related to participant or target gender. Corroborating this argument, an example study is presented on the gender bias in face recognition, the finding that women correctly recognize more female than male faces. In contrast, findings with male participants have been inconclusive. An online experiment (N = 1,147) was carried out, on purpose over-sampling lesbian and gay participants. Findings demonstrate that the pro-female gender bias in face recognition is modified by male participants’ sexual orientation. Heterosexual women and lesbians as well as heterosexual men showed a pro-female gender bias in face recognition, whereas gay men showed a pro-male gender bias, consistent with the explanation that differences in face expertise develop congruent with interests. These results contribute to the growing evidence that participant sexual orientation can be used to distinguish between alternative theoretical explanations of given gender-correlated patterns of findings.
References
2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
. (2010). I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 804–808. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp. 2010.04.015
(1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1081–1093.
(2008). Female sexual orientation and menstrual influences on person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 729–734. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.05.003
(2008). Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275, 63–69. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1073
(2010). Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women’s preferences for direct gaze. British Journal of Psychology, 1021, 109–121.
(1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 393–396. doi: 10.3758/BF03210319
(1973). The effects of age and sex upon adolescents’ recognition of faces. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123, 173–174.
(1976). Children’s ability to recognize other children’s faces. Child Development, 47, 506–510. doi: 10.2307/1128809
(1989). Fragebogen zur Erfassung dispositionaler Selbstaufmerksamkeit (SAM) (Questionnaire measuring dispositional self-directed attention). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
(2004). Sex-differential brain activation during exposure to female and male faces. NeuroReport, 15, 235–238. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200402090-00004
(2011). Where cognitive development and aging meet: Face learning ability peaks after age 30. Cognition. 201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.002
(2010). Sex-dimorphic face shape preference in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1289–1296. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9559-6
(1974). Effects of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 109–110. doi: 10.2466/pms.1974.39.1.109
(2001). The effects of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 723–735. doi: 10.37//0022-3514.80.5.723
(1991). Avoiding heterosexist bias in psychological research. American Psychologist, 46, 957–963. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.957
(1997). Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 25, 801–811. doi: 10.3758/BF03211324
(2008). Sex differences in episodic memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 52–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00547.x
(2002). Sex differences in episodic memory: The Influence of intelligence. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 107–114. doi: 10.1076/jcen.24.1.107.970
(2006). Integrating gaze direction and expression in preferences for attractive faces. Psychological Science, 17, 588–591.
(1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1166–1172.
(2012). When the grass on the other side of the fence doesn’t matter: Reciprocal romantic interest neutralizes attentional bias towards attractive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp. 2011.06.012
(2006). Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Current Biology, 16, 63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.070
(2002). Sex differences in face recognition – women’s faces make the difference. Brain and Cognition, 50, 121–128. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(02)00016-7
(2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 193–208. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9151-2
(2008). Sex differences and sexual orientation differences in personality: Findings from the BBC internet survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 173–187. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9267-z
(2011). Women’s own-gender bias in face recognition memory: The role of attention at encoding. Experimental Psychology, 58, 333–340. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000100
(2012). Differential processing of social chemosignals obtained from potential partners in regards to gender and sexual orientation. Behavioural Brain Research, 228, 375–387. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.12.018
(1987). Sex differences, lateral reversal, and pose as factors in recognition memory for photographs of faces. The Journal of General Psychology, 114, 13–38. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1987.9711052
(2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimul. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630–633. doi: 10.3758/BF03206543
(2005). The influence of sexual orientation on participants’ judgements of facial attractiveness in older women. Sexualities, Evolution, and Gender, 7, 135–152. doi: 10.3758/BF03206543
(2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41, 147–155. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00145-8
(2006). Higher face recognition ability in girls: Magnified by own-sex and own-ethnicity bias. Memory, 14, 289–296. doi: 10.1080/09658210500233581
(2007). Women remember more faces than men do. Acta Psychologica, 124, 344–355. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.04.004
(1983). Visual attention as a function of sex and apparel of stimulus object: Who looks at whom?. Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 11–15. doi: 10.2224/sbp. 1983.11.2.11
(2008). The social psychology of gender. New York, NY: Guilford.
(2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 494–509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494
(2011). Person perception 25 years after Bruce and Young (1986): An introduction. British Journal of Psychology (Special issue: Person perception 25 years after Bruce and Young 1986), 102, 695–703. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8295.2011.02070.x
(2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in Whites. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 71–84. doi: 10.1207/15324830051036162
(1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34
(2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes towards lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 49, 39–66. doi: 10.1300/J082v49n02_03
(1916). The correlation between the sex of observers and the sex of pictures recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 351–354. doi: 10.1037/h0075943
(2012). Daily-life contact affects the own-age bias and neural correlates of face memory in elderly participants. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3496–3508. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.022
(2010). Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107, 5238–5241.
(2003). An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 114, 101–114. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(03)00052-0
(