Auditory Distraction Eliminates Retrieval Induced Forgetting
Implications for the Processing of Unattended Sound
Abstract
The Retrieval-Induced Forgetting (RIF) paradigm includes three phases: (a) study/encoding of category exemplars, (b) practicing retrieval of a sub-set of those category exemplars, and (c) recall of all exemplars. At the final recall phase, recall of items that belong to the same categories as those items that undergo retrieval practice, but that did not undergo retrieval practice themselves, is impaired. The received view is that this is because retrieval of target category-exemplars (e.g., “Tiger” in the category Four-legged animal) requires inhibition of nontarget category-exemplars (e.g., “Dog” and “Lion”) that compete for retrieval. Here, we used the RIF paradigm to investigate whether ignoring auditory items during the retrieval-practice phase modulates the inhibitory process. In two experiments, RIF was present when retrieval practice was conducted in quiet and when it was conducted in the presence of spoken words that were drawn from a different category to that from which the targets for retrieval practice were selected. In contrast, RIF was abolished when words that were either identical to, or merely semantically related to, the retrieval-practice words were presented as background speech. The results suggest that the act of ignoring speech can reduce inhibition of the non-practiced category-exemplars, thereby eliminating RIF, but only when the spoken words are competitors for retrieval (i.e., belong to the same semantic category as the to-be-retrieved items).
References
2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445.
(2005). The role of inhibitory control in forgetting unwanted memories: A consideration of three methods. In , Dynamic cognitive processes (pp. 159–190). Tokyo, Japan: Springer-Verlag.
(1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.
(1999). Integration as a general boundary condition on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 608–629.
(1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68–100.
(2011). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37, 264–269.
(2004). The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: What role for working memory capacity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 30, 1106–1118.
(2008). Age related differences in irrelevant speech effects. Psychology and Aging, 23, 377–391.
(1958). Perception and Communication. London, UK: Pergamon Press.
(2004). Valence of distracter words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 32, 722–731.
(2003). Disruption of inhibitory control of memory following lesions to the frontal and temporal lobes. Cortex, 39, 667–686.
(1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2006). A strategy disruption component to retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 34, 102–111.
(2002). The irrelevant-speech effect and children: Theoretical implications of developmental change. Memory & Cognition, 30, 478–487.
(2013). The blocking effect of semantic similarity in auditory distraction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2003). A negative order-repetition priming effect: Inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 199–218.
(2012). Retrieval from memory: Vulnerable or inviolable?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 38, 905–922.
(2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 550–558.
(2012). Inhibitory control in memory: Evidence for negative priming in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1377–1388.
(2008). Auditory distraction in semantic memory: A process-based approach. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 682–700.
(2009). Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition, 110, 23–38.
(2013). The ins and the outs of memory: The impact of distraction on the strategic control of source and output monitoring processes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 403–423.
(1999). The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Memory & Cognition, 27, 37–44.
(1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cueing: A persisting enigma in memory research. Memory & Cognition, 12, 531–552.
(2012). Memory inhibition, aging, and the executive deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 178–186.
(1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 213242.
(2009). Retrieval-induced forgetting and executive control. Psychological Science, 20, 1053–1058.
(1970). Output interference in long-term memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 24, 85–89.
(2010). High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: Further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Memory & Cognition, 38, 651–658.
(2010). Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction. Brain & Cognition, 74, 79–87.
(2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 289–335.
(