Does Object Size Matter With Regard to the Mental Simulation of Object Orientation?
Abstract
Abstract. Language comprehenders have been arguing to mentally represent the implied orientation of objects. However, compared to the effects of shape, size, and color, the effect of orientation is rather small. We examined a potential explanation for the relatively low magnitude of the orientation effect: Object size moderates the orientation effect. Theoretical considerations led us to predict a smaller orientation effect for small objects than for large objects in a sentence–picture verification task. We furthermore investigated whether this pattern generalizes across languages (Chinese, Dutch, and English) and tasks (picture-naming task). The results of the verification task show an orientation effect overall, which is not moderated by object size (contrary to our hypothesis) and language (consistent with our hypothesis). Meanwhile, the preregistered picture–picture verification task showed the predicted interaction between object size and orientation effect. We conducted exploratory analyses to address additional questions.
References
(1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19 (6), 716–723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
(2019). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 388407. 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
(1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
(2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.
(2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 158–167. 10.3758/BF03195507
(2014). Bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS) phase II: 930 new normative photos. PLoS One, 9(9),
e106953 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0106953(2010). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
(2018). Investigating object orientation effects across 14 languages. 10.31234/osf.io/t2pjv
(1993). Mental rotation, mental representation, and flat slopes. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 351–382. 10.1006/cogp.1993.1009
(2005). Colour and stability in embodied representations. In B. BaraL.W. BarsalouM. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 482–487). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2007). Representing object colour in language comprehension. Cognition, 102, 476–485. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.009
(2017a). Mental simulation of four visual object properties: Similarities and differences as assessed by the sentence-picture verification task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(4), 420–432. 10.1080/20445911.2017.1281283
(2017b). Size does matter: Implied object size is mentally simulated during language comprehension. Discourse Processes, 54(7), 493–503. 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1119604
(2011). Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(4), 659–675. 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.009
(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
(2018). Sensory constraints on perceptual simulation during sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(6), 848–855. 10.1037/xhp0000475
(2017). Is color an integral part of a rich mental simulation? Memory & Cognition, 45(6), 974–982. 10.3758/s13421-017-0708-1
(1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
(2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 547–559. 10.3758/BF03192726
(2015). BayesFactor: 0.9.12-2 CRAN. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.31202
(2019). Six challenges for embodiment research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 593–599. 10.1177/0963721419866441
(1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature, 375(6526), 54–58. 10.1038/375054a0
(2009). Language comprehenders retain implied shape and orientation of objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(6), 1108–1114. 10.1080/17470210802633255
(2013). Object shape and orientation do not routinely influence performance during language processing. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2218–2225. 10.1177/0956797613490746
(2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. 10.1037/met0000061
(2014). Embodiment and language. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 127–138). New York, NY: Routledge.
(1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
(2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156. 10.1111/1467-9280.00326
(2015). Individual differences in spatial cognition influence mental simulation of language. Cognition, 142, 110–122. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.017
(1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68(1), 77–94. 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00032-8
(2003). Human motor cortex activity during mental rotation. NeuroImage, 20(1), 225–232. 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00235-0
(2012). Language comprehenders represent object distance both visually and auditorily. Language and Cognition, 4(1), 1–16. 10.1515/langcog-2012-0001
(1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 397–412. 10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.397 W
(2009). Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica, 132(2), 173–189. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002
(2007). Simulating visibility during language comprehension. Cognition, 105(1), 229–236. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.003
(2014). Replications should be performed with power and precision: A response to Rommers, Meyer, and Huettig (2013). Psychological Science, 25(1), 305–307. 10.1177/0956797613509634
(2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D PecherR A Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 224–245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2012). Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: Six replication attempts. PLoS One, 7, e51382. 10.1371/journal.pone.0051382
(2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171. 10.1111/1467-9280.00430
(2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1–11. 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1
