An Information-Processing Model for Audiences’ Selections of Movies
Quantitative Versus Qualitative Bandwagon Effects
Abstract
Abstract. Building on psychocognitive theories of information processing, the purpose of this study was to examine the relative impacts of qualitative bandwagon (e.g., using qualitative information such as comments and reviews) and quantitative bandwagon (e.g., using quantitative information such as view and download counts as bandwagon cues) on content selection decisions by media users. An experiment (N = 77) was conducted to investigate the contributions of the two types of bandwagon behaviors to the selections of Hollywood movies online and to identify factors moderating such bandwagon effects. The results showed that cognitive load was negatively associated with the strength of qualitative bandwagon effects, while positively associated with the strength of quantitative bandwagon effects. Although it was marginally significant, the results also showed that the impact of the quantitative bandwagon effect became stronger when individuals were less familiar with Hollywood movies. Implications with respect to tendency for choice imitation, as well as the conceptual understanding of and methodological approach to the bandwagon behaviors in movie selection, are discussed.
References
1987). Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 30–40.
(2001). Image variations of Turkey by familiarity index: Informational and experiential dimensions. Tourism Management, 22, 127–133.
(1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 15, 215–227.
(1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234–248.
(2004). The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors’ liability verdicts. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 429–446.
(1988).
(A dual process model of impression formation . In T. K. SrullR. S. Wyer Jr.Eds., Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
(1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805–818.
(2007). I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: Analyzing the world’s largest user generated content video system. Paper presented at the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement.
(1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.
(1989).
(Heuristic and systematic information processing within and . In J. S. UlemanJ. A. BarghEds., Unintended Thought (pp. 212–252). New York: Guilford Press.1998). Accuracy motivation, consensus information, and the law of large numbers: Effects on attitude judgment in the absence of argumentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1205–1215.
(2001). Quality signals in information cascades and the dynamics of the distribution of motion picture box office revenues. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25, 593–614.
(1996). Bose-Einstein dynamics and adaptive contracting in the motion picture industry. The Economic Journal, 106, 1493–1514.
(2001). Coveted or overlooked? The psychology of bidding for comparable listings in digital auctions. Marketing Letters, 12, 225–237.
(2006). Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 797–813.
(2004). Termination-discriminatory pricing, subscriber bandwagons, and network traffic patterns: the Taiwanese mobile phone market. Telecommunications Policy, 28, 5–22.
(2011). Aggregate bandwagon effect on online videos’ viewership: Value uncertainty, popularity cues, and heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 2382–2395.
(1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23, 545–560.
(2001).
(The heuristics and biases approach to judgment under uncertainty . In A. TesserN. SchwarzEds., Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 207–235). Malden, MA: Blackwell.1996). Hits and misses: Herd behavior and online product popularity. Marketing Letters, 7, 297–305.
(2011). Cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional effects of news frame and group cues, on processing news about immigration. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23, 174–185.
(1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.
(1984). Product familiarity and learning new information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 542–550.
(1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2013). Exploring the effects of online word of mouth and expert reviews on theatrical movies’ box office success. Journal of Media Economics, 26, 98–114.
(2005). Impact of popularity indications on readers’ selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 296–313.
(2012). Perceived familiarity or factual knowledge? Comparing operationalizations of scientific understanding. Science and Public Policy, 39, 761–774.
(2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of marketing, 70, 74–89.
(1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13–25.
(2013). Political learning through entertainment–only an illusion? How motivations for watching TV political talk shows influence viewers’ experiences. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 25, 171–179. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000100
(2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413–439.
(1991). The future of the mass audience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2009). The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 399–410.
(1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 223–231.
(2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192.
(2009). An integrative review of process dissociation and related models in social cognition. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 272–314.
(2007).
(Automatic and controlled components of social cognition: A process dissociation approach . In J. A. BarghEd., Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 293–315). New York: Psychology Press.1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
(1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
(1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.
(1983). A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 366–380.
(1991). Comprehension’s role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 52–62.
(2008). Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: The impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 477–488.
(2008).
(College students’ credibility judgments in the information-seeking process . In M. J. MetzgerA. J. FlanaginEds., Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 49–72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.2008). Trends in media use. The Future of Children, 18, 11–37.
(2003). Bandwagon effects in high-technology industries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311, 854–856.
(1954). Bandwagon and underdog effects and the possibility of election predictions. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 18, 245–253.
(2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131.
(2008).
(The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility . In M. J. MetzgerA. J. FlanaginEds., Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.2007). News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 366–378.
(2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 52–72.
(2008). The bandwagon effect of collaborative filtering technology. Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI 2008) Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy. Boston, MA: ACM, 3453–3458.
(2009). Authority vs. peer: How interface cues influence users. Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI 2009) Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4231–4236. Boston, MA: ACM.
(2006).
(Involvement . In J. BryantP. VordererEds., Psychology of entertainment (pp. 199–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798–810.
(1985). Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 73–85.
(2013). Bandwagon effects of popularity information on audiences’ media product selection: Information load and cultural unfamiliarity. Washington, DC: Paper presented at the annual conference of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
(2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74, 133–148.
(