Skip to main content
Original Article

Is There a Gender Difference in Cyber-Victimization?

A Meta-Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000185

Abstract. The study provides a quantitative synthesis of the literature on gender difference in cyber-victimization (CV). A total of 40 usable research articles were identified and used in this meta-analysis. With some articles having multiple effect sizes, a total of 150 effect sizes for gender difference in CV were obtained. Results indicated a small gender difference, with females experiencing slightly more CV than their male counterparts. However, there were considerable inconsistencies across the studies. Follow-up analyses on the study features revealed that several factors, such as response time frame and region of sampling, significantly moderated the relationship between gender and CV. Exploratory in nature, this study discusses the implications of the findings in reference to existing theories, and suggests future research directions.

References (An asterisk indicates that the study was used in the meta-analysis.)

  • Abeele, M. V. & Cock, R. (2013). Cyberbullying by mobile phone among adolescents: The role of gender and peer group status. Communications, 38, 107–118. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Ackers, M. J. (2012). Cyberbullying: Through the eyes of children and young people. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28, 141–157. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N. & Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 253–261. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Barlett, C. P. & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 123–135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Beckman, L., Hagquist, C. & Hellström, L. (2012). Does the association with psychosomatic health problems differ between cyberbullying and traditional bullying? Educational & Behavioral Difficulties, 17, 421–434. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berne, S., Frisén, A., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Naruskov, K., Luik, P., … Zukauskiene, R. (2013). Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 320–334. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E. & O’Brennan, L. M. (2013). A latent class approach to examining forms of peer victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0032091 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Melotti, G., Galli, S. & Genta, M. L. (2012). Predictors of victimisation across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying. Emotional & Behavioral Difficulties, 17, 375–388. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, C. F., Demaray, M. K. & Secord, S. M. (2014). Cyber-victimization in middle school and relations to social emotional outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 12–21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, L. & Cheng, Y. (2013). Prevalence of school bullying among secondary students in Taiwan: Measurements with and without a specific definition of bullying. School Psychology International, 34, 707–720. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A. & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 322–331. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Craig, W., Harel-Fisch, Y., Fogel-Grinvald, H., Dostaler, S., Hetland, J., Simons-Morton, B. & Pickett, P. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 216–224. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-5413-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cuadrado, I. (2012). Repetition, power imbalance, and intentionality: Do these criteria conform to teenagers’ perception of bullying? A role-based analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1889–1910. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Dehue, F., Bolman, C. & Vollink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 217–223. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Dempsey, A. G., Sulkowski, M. L., Nichols, R. & Storch, E. A. (2009). Differences between peer victimization in cyber and physical settings and associated psychological adjustment in early adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 962–972. doi: 10.1002/pits.20437 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Dilmac, B. (2009). Psychological needs as a predictor of cyber bullying: A preliminary report on college students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9, 1307–1325. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Erdur-Baker, O. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12, 109–125. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fan, X. & Sun, S. (2013). Item response model. In T. TimothyEd., Handbook of quantitative methods for educational research (pp. 45–67). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publisher. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Floros, G. D., Siomos, K. E., Fisoun, V., Dafouli, E. & Geroukalis, D. (2013). Adolescent online cyberbullying in Greece: The impact of parental online security practices, bonding, and online impulsiveness. Journal of School Health, 83, 445–453. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D., Schiller, E. M., Stefanek, E. & Spiela, C. (2012). Cyber-victimization and popularity in early adolescence: Stability and predictive associations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 228–243. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D. & Spiel, C. (2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 217(4), 205–213. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Griezel, L., Craven, R. G., Yeung, A. S. & Finger, L. R. (2008, December). The development of a multi-dimensional measure of cyberbullying. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Australia. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • He, J. & van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2. doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hedges, L. V. (1982). Statistical methodology in meta-analysis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227–133). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E. & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 39–65. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29, 129–156. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Huang, Y. & Chou, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1581–1590. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Jackson, C. L. & Cohen, R. (2012). Childhood victimization: Modeling the relation between classroom victimization, cyber-victimization, and psychosocial functioning. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 254–269. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D. & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in Internet chatrooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 25–36. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105.21.1.25 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N. & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0035618 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Kowalski, R. M. & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22–S30. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Kowalski, R. M., Morgan, C. A. & Limber, S. P. (2012). Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. School Psychology International, 33, 505–519. doi: 10.1177/0143034312445244 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Kwan, G. C. & Skoric, M. M. (2013). Facebook bullying: An extension of battles in school. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 16–25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157–170. doi: 10.1177/0143034306064547 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1777–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Loftus, E. F., Banaji, M. R., Schooler, J. W. & Foster, R. (1987). Who remembers what?: Gender differences in memory. Michigan Quarterly Review, 26, 64–85. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Machmutow, K., Perren, S., Sticca, F. & Alsaker, F. D. (2012). Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: Can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? Emotional & Behavioral Difficulties, 17, 403–420. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Mesch, G. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 387–393. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0068 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J. & Solomon, S. (2010). Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 362–374. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Monks, C. P., Robinson, S. & Worlidge, P. (2012). The emergence of cyberbullying: A survey of primary school pupils’ perceptions and experiences. School Psychology International, 33, 477–491. doi: 10.1177/0143034312445242 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Navarro, R., Serna, C., Martínez, V. & Ruiz-Oliva, R. (2013). The role of Internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools. European Journal of Psychological Education, 28, 725–745. doi: 10.1007/s10212-012-0137-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Ortega, R., Elipe, P., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Calmaestra, J. & Vega, E. (2009). The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: A study of Spanish adolescents. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 217(4), 197–204. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.197 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • *Perren, S., Dooley, J., Shaw, T. & Cross, D. (2010). Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 4(28), 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-4-28 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pieschl, S., Porsch, T., Kahl, T. & Klockenbusch, R. (2013). Relevant dimensions of cyberbullying – results from two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34, 241–252. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Popovic-Citic, B., Djuric, S. & Cvetkovic, V. (2011). The prevalence of cyberbullying among adolescents: A case study of middle schools in Serbia. School Psychology International, 32, 412–424. doi: 10.1177/0143034311401700 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Pornari, C. D. & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81–94. doi: 10.1002/ab.20336 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Price, M. & Dalgleish, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Studies Australia, 29, 51–59. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Savage, M. (2012). Developing a measure of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://repository.asu.edu/attachments/94134/content/tmp/package-8y6MUh/Savage_asu_0010E_12199.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Jäkel, A., Schultze, M. & Scheithauer, H. (2012). Emotional and behavioural problems in the context of cyberbullying: A longitudinal study among German adolescents. Emotional & Behavioral Difficulties, 17, 329–345. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shaver, J. P. (1991). Quantitative reviewing of research. In J. P. ShaverEd., Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 83–97). New York, NY: Macmillan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shih, T. & Fan, X. (2009). Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 4, 26–40. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R. F., Liefooghe, A. P., Almeida, A., Araki, H. & Wenxin, Z. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child Development, 73, 1119–1133. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S. & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snell, P. A. & Englander, E. (2010). Cyberbullying victimization and behaviors among girls: Applying research findings in the field. Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 510–514. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Sticca, F., Ruggieri, S., Alsaker, F. & Perren, S. (2012). Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 52–67. doi: 10.1002/casp.2136 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tanner-Smith, E. & Tipton, E. (in press). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations and a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 13–30. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tipton, E. (2013). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression for binary dependent outcomes. Research Synthesis Methods, 4(2), 169–187. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1070 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tokunaga, R. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 277–287. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Krygsman, A., Miller, J., Stiver, K. & Davis, C. (2008). Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 486–495. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Wachs, S., Wolf, K. D. & Pan, C. (2012). Cybergrooming: Risk factors, coping strategies and associations with cyberbullying. Psicothema, 24, 628–633. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Walrave, M. (2011). Cyberbullying: Predicting victimization and perpetration. Children & Society, 25, 59–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00260.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J. & Luk, J. W. (2011). Peer victimization and academic adjustment among early adolescents: Moderation by gender and mediation by perceived classmate support. Journal of School Health, 81, 386–392. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J. & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ybarra, M. L., Boyd, D., Korchmaros, J. D. & Oppenheim, J. (2012). Defining and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 53–58. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ybarra, M. L., Espelage, D. L. & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). The co-occurrence of Internet harassment and unwanted sexual solicitation victimization and perpetration: associations with psychosocial indicators. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S31–41. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Zhou, Z., Tang, H., Tian, Y., Wei, H., Zhang, F. & Morrison, C. M. (2013). Cyberbullying and its risk factors among Chinese high school students. School Psychology International. [online first] doi: 10.1177/0143034313479692 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar