How Media Portrayals of Suffering Influence Willingness to Help
The Role of Solvability Frames
Abstract
Abstract. When we hear stories of distant humanitarian crises, we often feel sympathy for victims, but may stop short of taking action to help. Past research indicates that media portrayals of distant suffering can promote helping behavior by eliciting sympathy, while those that prompt a more rational response tend to decrease helping behavior by undermining sympathy. The authors used an online experiment to test whether certain media frames could promote helping behavior through a more rational, rather than emotional, pathway. The study tested whether framing distant suffering as either solvable or unsolvable might promote helping behavior if a rational evaluation of a crisis leads one to determine that help is efficacious in solving the problem. Survey respondents were randomly assigned to read one of three messages: a high solvability message, a low solvability message, or a control message. Contrary to expectations, both low solvability and high solvability conditions increased participants’ intentions to help. The results suggest that this is because framing problems as unsolvable drives up sympathy, thus promoting willingness to help, while framing problems as solvable drives up perceived efficacy, also promoting willingness to help. The authors conclude that, in contrast to earlier studies, and to the assumptions of many of those working in media, emphasizing rationality can promote helping behavior if audiences rationally interpret the problem as solvable. Implications of the findings for ethically portraying distant suffering in the media are discussed.
References
(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105–118.
(2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 924–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927
(2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
(1999). Distant suffering: Morality, media and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2012). User views of fundraising. London, UK: Centre for Charitable Giving and Philanthropy.
(2006). Media coverage and charitable giving after the 2004 tsunami (Working Paper No. 855). Ann Arbor, MI: The William Davidson Institute.
(2000). Social-cognitive factors of donating money to charity, with special attention to an international relief organization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00003-3
(2011).
The critical link between tangibility and generosity . In D. M. OppenheimerC. Y. OlivolaEds., The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 237–251). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.(2012). The donor is in the details. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 15–23.
(2013). Goal gradient in helping behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1078–1083.
(2005).
What democracy requires of the media . In G. OverholserK. H. JamiesonEds., The press (pp. 120–140). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.(2014). The power of solutions journalism. Solutions Journalism Network. Retrieved from http://solutionsjournalism.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ENP_SJN-report.pdf
(1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
(2006). Crisis mentality. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 4, 46–55.
(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
(2006). The role of theory in developing effective health communications. Journal of Communication, 56, S1–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00280.x
(2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
(2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x
(2016, January 17). Obama’s goal to wipe out malaria may be a dream too far. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/18/us/politics/obamas-goal-to-wipe-out-malaria-may-be-a-dream-too-far.html?_r=0
(2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
(2006). Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1086/504141
(1996). Compassion fatigue: Communication and burnout toward social problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(3), 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300314
(2015a). For the public good or just good publicity? Celebrities and humanitarianism. Mass Communication & Society, 18(1), 37–57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.851699
(2015b). Not up for debate: U.S. news coverage of Hunger in Africa. International Communication Gazette, 77(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514556973
(2005). The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.003
(1981). Does mass communication change public opinion after all?. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
(2007). The scarecrow and the tin man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review of General Psychology, 11, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.112
(2007). The interaction of message frames and reference points in prosocial persuasive appeals. Psychology and Marketing, 24(11), 1001–1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20193
(1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9
(2010). The geopolitics of representation in foreign news: Explaining Darfur. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
(1999). Compassion fatigue: How the media sell disease, famine, war and death. New York, NY: Routledge.
(2006). Examining the effects of public journalism on civil society from 1994 to 2002: Organizational factors, project features, story frames, and citizen engagement. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300106
(1993). Culture and imperialism. New York, NY: Knopf.
(2007). “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 79–95.
(2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005
(2009). The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.6.777
(1977). On photography. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
. (2016). Remarks of President Barack Obama: State of the Union address as delivered [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/12/remarks-president-barack-obama-%E2%80%93-prepared-delivery-state-union-address
(2009). Antismoking threat and efficacy appeals: Effects on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high readiness to quit. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880802593928
