Let’s Go to the Movies…for Science!
The Impact of Entertainment Narratives on Science Knowledge, Interest, and Information-Seeking Intention
Abstract
Abstract. This study examined whether watching science-related entertainment narratives can influence science learning, interest in science, and information-seeking intentions. Based on the capacity model (Fisch, 2000), a more precise processing variable called engagement with the science content was proposed as an additional mechanism that can account for variance not explained by existing narrative engagement variables. Results of a between-subjects experiment showed that watching a science-related narrative increased all three science outcomes. Engagement with the science content explained significantly more variance in posttest interest and information-seeking than did narrative engagement or transportation. Science knowledge was acquired regardless of preexisting level of interest, demonstrating the benefits of popular entertainment narratives in fostering informal science learning among nonexpert audiences.
References
(2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159
Bell, P.Lewenstein, B.Shouse, A. W.Feder, M. A. (Eds.) (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
(2018). The National Science Foundation’s science and technology survey and support for science funding, 2006–2014. Public Understanding of Science, 27, 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516649803
Bryant, J.Vorderer, P. (Eds.). (2006). Psychology of entertainment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2016). Consumer expenditures – 2015. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cesan.pdf
(2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259
(2003). Entertainment television as a healthy sex educator: The impact of condom-efficacy information in an episode of Friends. Pediatrics, 112, 1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.5.1115
(2010). The role of causality in information acceptance in narratives: An example from science communication. Communication Research, 37, 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362683
(2012). The persuasive influence of narrative causality: Psychological mechanism, strength in overcoming resistance, and persistence over time. Media Psychology, 15, 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.702604
(2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 13614–13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
(2000). A capacity model of children’s comprehension of educational content on television. Media Psychology, 2, 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0201_4
(1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180
(2015, September 10). A look at what the public knows and does not know about science. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2015/09/2015-09-10_science-knowledge_FINAL.pdf
(1993). You can’t not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221
(2009). Narrative-based learning: Possible benefits and problems. Communications, 34, 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.026
(2002).
How does the mind construct and represent stories? . In M. C. GreenJ. J. StrangeT. C. BrockEds., Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 229–262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.(2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
(2009). Finding the teachable moment: An analysis of information-seeking behavior on global warming related websites during the release of “The Day After Tomorrow”. Environmental Communication, 3, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903265823
(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(1995). The utilization of fiction when teaching the theory of relativity. Physics Education, 30, 284–286. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/30/5/005
(2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 34, 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106291963
(2006). CSI: Reality. Scientific American, 295, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0706-84
(2013). Understanding the effectiveness of the entertainment-education strategy: An investigation of how audience involvement, message processing, and message design influence health information recall. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.688244
(2009). If we seek, do we learn? Predicting knowledge of global warming. Science Communication, 30, 380–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008328798
(2007). The application of historical narrative in science learning: The Atlantic cable story. Science & Education, 16, 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9026-x
(2016). Calculation of effect sizes. Dettelbach, Germany: Psychometrica.
(2014). Informal learning through science media usage. Educational Psychologist, 49, 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916215
(1999). Using television to foster children’s interest in science. Science Communication, 20, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547099020003001
(2009). The power of narratives: The effect of entertainment television organ donation storylines on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of donors and nondonors. Journal of Communication, 59, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01408.x
(2011). Involved, transported, or emotional? Exploring the determinants of change in knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in entertainment-education. Journal of Communication, 61, 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01554.x
. (2018). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/science-and-technology-public-attitudes-and-understanding/public-knowledge-about-s-t
(2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 29, 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196
. (2013). Public’s knowledge of science and technology. Retrieved from https://www.people-press.org/2013/04/22/publics-knowledge-of-science-and-technology/
(2014). Media representations of climate change: A meta-analysis of the research field. Environmental Communication, 8, 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.914050
(1995).
Knowledge and memory: The real story . In R. S. WyerEd., Advances in social cognition VIII (pp. 1–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.(2014). Effectiveness of entertainment education in communicating health information: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Communication, 24, 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.927895
(2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
(2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/12.2.173
. (2017). Film and movie industry – statistics and facts. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/964/film/
(2013). 10 the effects of engagement with entertainment. Annals of the International Communication Association, 37, 287–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679153
(2007, June).
Serious video game effectiveness . In R. BernhauptM. TschegeliEds., Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 49–55). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1255047.1255057(1999). Influence of text genre on adults’ monitoring of understanding and recall. Educational Gerontology, 25, 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/036012799267440
(2005). Understanding health literacy: An expanded model. Health Promotion International, 20(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dah609
