Skip to main content
Research Report

Further Validation and Cross-Cultural Replication of the Video Game Demand Scale

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000280

Abstract. The Video Game Demand Scale (VGDS) is a 26-item, five-factor scale designed to assess the cognitive, emotional, physical, and social demands experienced by video game players. Given the international relevance of video games, cross-cultural research focusing on gamers beyond the US community holds promise to substantiate and refine extant approaches. The current study introduces a German-language VGDS, which was tested for measurement invariance with respect to the original US scale as well as predictive, convergent, and concurrent validity (replicating the original VGDS validity tests). Results revealed configural and partial metric measurement invariance when compared with data from the original scale. Validity tests between the German-language VGDS and common measures of task load, entertainment, need satisfaction, and game ratings largely replicated original results. Overall, we conclude that the VGDS is a reliable, valid, and useful contribution to media psychological game research and suggest areas of future work for which an interactivity-as-demand focus might benefit.

References

  • Banks, J. (2015). Object, me, symbiote, other: A social typology of player-avatar relationships. First Monday, 20. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i2.5433 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Banks, J., Bowman, N. D., Lin, J.-H. T., Pietschmann, D., & Wasserman, J. A. (2019). The common player-avatar interaction scale (cPAX): Expansion and cross-language validation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 129, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.03.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowman, N. D. (Ed.). (2018). Video games: A medium that demands our attention. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bowman, N. D. (2020). Interactivity as demand: Implications for interactive media entertainment. In P. VordererC. KlimmtEds., The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 375–393). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bowman, N. D., & Tamborini, R. (2015). “In the mood to game”: Selective exposure and mood management processes in computer game play. New Media & Society, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813504274 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowman, N. D., Wasserman, J. A., & Banks, J. (2018). Development of the video game demand scale. In N. D. BowmanEd., Video games: A medium that demands our attention (pp. 208–233). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. HancockN. MeshkatiEds., Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hemenover, S., & Bowman, N. D. (2018). Video games, emotion, and emotion regulation: Bridging the gap. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1442239 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahn, A. S., Shen, C., Lu, L., Ratan, R. A., Coary, S., Hou, J., … Williams, D. (2015). The Trojan Player Typology: A cross-genre, cross-cultural, behaviorally validated scale of video game play motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.018 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liebold, B., Bowman, N. D., & Pietschmann, D. (2020). Natural in the eyes of the (be)holder: A survey on novelty and learning effects in the enjoyment of naturally mapped video game controllers. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000215 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McEwan, B., Carpenter, C. J., & Westerman, D. (2018). On replication in communication science. Communication Studies, 69, 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1464938 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Newzoo. (2018). Global games market report 2018. Retrieved from https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/700740/Reports/Newzoo_2018_Global_Games_Market_Report_Light.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oliver, M. B., Bowman, N. D., Woolley, J. K., Rogers, R., Sherrick, B. I., & Chung, M.-Y. (2016). Video games as meaningful entertainment experiences. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000066 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quandt, T., & Kroeger, S. (2013). Multiplayer: The social aspects of digital gaming. London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quandt, T., Chen, V., Mäyrä, F., & Van Looy, J. (2014). (Multiplayer) gaming around the globe? A comparison of gamer surveys in Four Countries. In T. QuandtS. KroegerEds., Multiplayer: The social aspects of digital gaming (pp. 23–46). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Salminen, M., & Kivikangas, M. (2006). Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing. Presence, 15, 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.15.4.381 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rieger, D., Wulf, T., Kneer, J., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2014). The winner takes it all: The effect of in-game success and need satisfaction on mood repair and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.037 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rogers, R., Bowman, N. D., & Oliver, M. B. (2015). It’s not the model that doesn’t fit, it’s the controller! The role of cognitive skills in understanding the links between natural mapping, performance, and enjoyment of console video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 588–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.027 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, F. M., Bartsch, A., & Oliver, M. B. (2019). Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the appreciation, fun, and suspense scales across US and German samples. Journal of Media Psychology, 31, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000236 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60, 758–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01513.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weber, R., Behr, K.-M., & DeMartino, C. (2014). Measuring interactivity in video games. Communication Methods and Measures, 8, 79–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.873778 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar