Is It Only the Violence?
The Effects of Violent Video Game Content, Difficulty, and Competition on Aggressive Behavior
Abstract
Abstract. The results of prior research investigating whether the violence in violent video games leads to increased subsequent aggression are mixed. Some observers question whether the difficulty and/or the competitive aspects of these games are important, but overlooked, factors that also affect aggression. In the present study, participants (N = 408) played a violent or nonviolent video game that was either difficult or easy and in which they competed and won, competed and lost, or did not compete against another player. Results revealed that participants became more aggressive only after playing a competitive, as opposed to a noncompetitive, game. Level of violence, winning or losing, and game difficulty did not have any significant effect. These results support the assertion that competition in video games has an independent and significant effect on subsequent aggression beyond violent content and game difficulty.
References
2011). The effect of videogame competition and violence on aggressive behavior: Which characteristic has the greatest influence? Psychology of Violence, 1(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024908
(2013). Demolishing the competition: The longitudinal link between competitive video games, competitive gambling, and aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1090–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9952-2
(2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 772–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.772
(1995). Competitive aggression without interaction: Effects of competitive versus cooperative instructions on aggressive behavior in video games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1020–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952110003
(2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018251
(2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291
(2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007
(2002). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior: Potential sex differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1502
(1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59
(2015). Sore losers? A reexamination of the frustration–aggression hypothesis for colocated video game play. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000020
(2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(2), 138–167. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2302
(2015). Testing the reliability and validity of different measures of violent video game use in the United States, Singapore, and Germany. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000004
(2017). The American Psychological Association Task Force assessment of violent video games: Science in the service of public interest. American Psychologist, 72(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040413
(1993). Educating for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 48(5), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.510
(2018). Meta-analyses were supposed to end scientific debates. Often, they only cause more controversy. Science, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav4617
(2014). Doom 2: Hell on Earth turns 20 years old this week, and it’s still great. https://www.digitalspy.com/videogames/retro-gaming/a603734/doom-2-hell-on-earth-turns-20-years-old-this-week-and-its-still-great/
(2015). Comparing apples and oranges? Evidence for pace of action as a confound in research on digital games and aggression. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000010
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
(2015). Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video game influences on children’s and adolescents’ aggression, mental health, prosocial behavior and academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 646–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615592234
(2020). Reexamining the findings of the American Psychological Association’s 2015 Task Force on Violent Media: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927666
(2018). The game that kicked off a video game revolution turns 25 today. https://qz.com/1490069/doom-the-game-that-kicked-off-a-video-game-revolution-turns-25-today/
(2010). Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016997
(2016). Competitive video game play: An investigation of identification and competition. Communication Research, 43(4), 468–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565895
(2014). Hilgard’s modified video game paradigm. https://osf.io/3cb9m
(2017). Overstated evidence for short-term effects of violent games on affect and behavior: A reanalysis of Anderson et al. (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 143(7), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000074
(2019). Null effects of game violence, game difficulty, and 2d:4d digit ratio on aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 30(4), 606–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619829688
(1994). Doom II: Hell on earth. [Video game]. GT Interactive Software. https://www.digitalspy.com/videogames/retro-gaming/a603734/doom-2-hell-on-earth-turns-20-years-old-this-week-and-its-still-great/
. (2018). Learning to love guns? Gun-based gameplay’s links to gun attitudes. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(3), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000132
(2019). Finding common ground in meta-analysis ”wars” on violent video games. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 705–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850104
(2016). Does playing video games with violent content temporarily increase aggressive inclinations? A pre-registered experimental study. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.009
(2018). A conceptual review of lab-based aggression paradigms. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.104
(2016). Modeling outcomes of violent video game play: Applying mental models and model matching to explain the relationship between user differences, game characteristics, enjoyment, and aggressive intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.018
(2015).
(Extensive modding for experimental game research . In P. LankoskiS. BjörkEds., Game research methods (pp. 323–340). ETC Press. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2812774.28127992007). Neural mechanisms of aggression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 536–546.
(2018). Meta-analysis of the relationship between violent video game play and physical aggression over time. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(40), 9882–9888. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611617114
(2015). Assessing helping and hurting behaviors through the Tangram help/hurt task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1345–1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215594348
(2012). Effects of prosocial, neutral, and violent video games on children’s helpful and hurtful behaviors. Aggressive Behavior, 38(4), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21428
(2010). Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6(4), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000016
(2010). “Killing spree”: Exploring the connection between competitive gameplay and aggressive cognition. Communication Research, 37(2), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356394
(2012). Causes of state hostility and enjoyment in player versus player and player versus environment video games. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01654.x
(2019). The relation of violent video games to adolescent aggression: An examination of moderated mediation effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 384. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00384
(1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037039
(2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). Routledge\Taylor & Francis Group.
(1944). Theory of games and economic behavior, Princeton University Press.
(2005). A two-level confirmatory factor analysis of a modified Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(3), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404272487
(