Skip to main content
Original Article

Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation

as Mediators of Worldview Beliefs on Attitudes Related to the War on Terror

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.93

The purpose of this study was to test an integrative model in which worldview beliefs were treated as antecedents of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO), and two sets of attitudes related to the War on Terror: endorsement of restrictions on human rights/civil liberties and support for the US military invasion of Iraq in 2003. Dangerous and competitive world beliefs significantly predicted RWA and SDO, respectively, during structural equation modeling. Whereas both RWA and SDO predicted endorsement of human rights/civil liberties attitudes, only RWA predicted support for military aggression against Iraq. Tests of indirect effects suggested that RWA mediated the effects of dangerous world beliefs on attitudes toward human rights/civil liberties and support for military aggression, whereas SDO mediated the effects of competitive world beliefs on attitudes toward human rights/civil liberties only.

References

  • Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In M.P. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arsenault, A. , Castells, M. (2006). Conquering the minds, conquering Iraq: The social production of misinformation in the United States – A case study. Information, Communication, and Society, 9, 284–307. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baron, R.M. , Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buky, M. (2006). Patriot games: Taking liberties. Social Alternatives, 25, 32–37. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Coffman, D.L. , MacCallum, R.C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235–259. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohrs, J.C. , Kielmann, S. , Maes, J. , Moschner, B. (2005). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 263–276. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohrs, J.C. , Moschner, B. , Maes, J. , Kielmann, J. (2005). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425–1434. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cole, D. (2006). Double standards, democracy, and human rights. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 18, 427–437. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cornelis, I. , Van Hiel, A. (2006). The impact of cognitive styles on the development of authoritarianism-based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 37–50. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crowson, H.M. (in press). Nationalism, internationalism, and perceived UN irrelevance: Mediators of relationships between authoritarianism and support for military aggression as part of the War on Terror? Journal of Applied Social Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crowson, H.M. (2007). Authoritarianism and human rights attitudes in US law students: A brief look. Individual Differences Research, 5, 260–266. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crowson, H.M. , DeBacker, T. , Thoma, S.J. (2005). Does authoritarianism predict post-9/11 attitudes? Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1273–1283. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crowson, H.M. , DeBacker, T.K. , Thoma, S.J. (2006). The role of authoritarianism, perceived threat, and need for closure or structure in predicting post-9/11 attitudes and beliefs. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 733–750. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M.P. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckitt, J. , Wagner, C. , du Plessis, I. , Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual-process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 75–93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekehammar, B. , Akrami, N. , Gylje, M. , Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism. European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heaven, P.C.L. , Organ, L. , Supavadeeprasit, S. , Leeson, P. (2006). War and prejudice: A study of social values, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 599–608. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henderson-King, D. , Henderson-King, E. , Bolea, B. , Koches, K. , Kauffman, A. (2004). Seeking bombs or sending bombs: Beliefs as predictors of responses to terrorism. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10, 67–84. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henry, P.S. , Sidanius, J. , Levin, S. , Pratto, F. (2005). Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the Middle East and America. Political Psychology, 26, 569–583. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, S.L. , Domke, D. , Coe, E. , & Graham, E.S. (2007). Going public, crisis after crisis: The Bush Administration and the press from September 11 to Saddam. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 10, 195–220. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kumar, D. (2006). Media, war, and propaganda: Strategies of misinformation management during the 2003 Iraq War. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 3, 48–69. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, S.G. (2005). On the eve of war: Authoritarianism, social dominance, and American students’ attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 360–367. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oswald, D.L. (2005). Understanding anti-Arab reactions post-9/11: The role of threats, social categories, and personal ideologies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1775–1799. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pratto, F. , Lemieux, A.F. , Glasford, D.E. , Henry, P.J. (2003). American and Lebanese college students’ responses to the events of September 11, 2001. Psicología Politica, 27, 13–35. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pratto, F. , Sidanius, J. , Stallworth, L.M. , Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roccoato, M. , Ricolfi, L. (2005). On the correlation between right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 187–200. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, M. (2006). Mainstream news media, an objective approach, and the march to war in Iraq. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 21, 4–29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schumacker, R.E. , Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sibley, C.G. , Wilson, M.S. , Duckitt, J. (2007a). Antecedents men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160–172. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sibley, C.G. , Wilson, M.S. , Duckitt, J. (2007b). Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a 5-month period. Political Psychology, 28, 357–371. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sidanius, J. , Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simons, H.W. (2007). From post-9/11 melodrama to quagmire in Iraq: A rhetorical history. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 10, 183–194. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, R.M. (2005). Civil liberties in the brave new world of antiterrorism. Radical History Review, 93, 170–85. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Hiel, A. , Cornelis, I. , Roets, A. (2007). The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the Five Factor model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 21, 131–148. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Hiel, A. , Pandelaere, M. , Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824–837. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar