Abstract
Two studies examined how ambivalent gender ideologies, measured by the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) and Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory (AMI), relate to the perceived legitimacy and stability of gender hierarchy. Study 1 showed simple correlations of each ASI and AMI subscale with the perceived legitimacy of gender hierarchy, but only Hostility Toward Men (HM: A traditional, but unflattering view of men as domineering) predicted the perceived stability of gender hierarchy. In Study 2, experimentally priming HM (but not other gender ideologies) increased perceptions of the stability of gender hierarchy. Although HM derides men for acting in a domineering manner, it characterizes men as designed for dominance. By reinforcing the perceived stability of gender hierarchy, HM may undermine women’s motivation to seek change.
References
(2006). What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 147–168.
(1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining southern homicide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 551–567.
(1993). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes and judgments of competence. In , European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1–35). New York: Wiley.
(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
(1999). The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536.
(2001). Ambivalent sexism. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press.
(2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
(2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728.
(2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 114–125.
(2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
(2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150–163.
(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2003, November 24). Who let the dogs out? U. S. News & World Report, p. 32.
(1981). Social identity and intergroup relations. London: Cambridge University Press.
(2002). I believe in the cause, but not in the word: Women’s ambivalence toward liberal feminism. Honors Thesis. Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin.
