The Effects of Counterfactual Attacks on Social Judgments
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to compare the effects of different styles of verbal criticism (factual vs. counterfactual) on the perceptions of target, source, and quality of the attack. Counterfactual attacks resulted in more negative overall judgment of the target and ratings of the target’s morality than either factual attacks or no attack. Counterfactual attacks were also rated more positively than factual attacks, and the source of the counterfactual attack was rated as being less biased against the target. Regression analyses confirmed that the observed effect on overall judgment was mediated by the perceived bias of the source. The greater effectiveness of counterfactual attacks was moderated by awareness of prior hostility of the source of the attack toward the target.
References
2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948.
(2008). Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202–1217.
(2008). Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1371–1381.
(2008). L’offerta personalizzata degli sfidanti. , Il ritorno di Berlusconi. Vincitori e vinti nelle elezioni del 2008
([The return of Berlusconi: Winners and losers in 2008 elections.] . (pp. 137–148). Bologna, Italy : Il Mulino.1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
(1988). Political equivocation: A situational explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 137–145.
(2013). The “Big Two” in political communication: The effects of attacking and defending politicians’ leadership or morality. Social Psychology, 44, 117–128.
(2010). How honest do politicians need to be? The Political Quarterly, 81, 49–56.
(2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143.
(1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Persuasiveness of in-group and out-group political messages: The case of negative political campaigning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 523–534.
(2010). Face, facework and political discourse. International Review of Social Psychology, 23, 155–185.
(2012). Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 30–48.
(1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.
(2010). Losing on all fronts: The effects of negative versus positive person-based campaigns on implicit and explicit evaluations of political candidates. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 453–470.
(2004). Counterfactual thinking and stereotypes: The nonconformity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 421–436.
(2014). The effects of counterfactual defences on social judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1995.
(2013). The strategic use of counterfactual communication in politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 495–504.
(2013). Counterfactual communication in politics: Features and effects on voters. In , Multimodal communication in political speech (pp. 75–85). Springer Verlag: Berlin.
(2001). Counterfactuals and roles: Mock victims’ and perpetrators’ accounts of judicial cases. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 247–264.
(2005). When the social context frames the case: Counterfactuals in the courtroom. In , The psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 183–198). London, UK: Routledge.
(2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1103–1110.
(2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682–696.
(2013). Shooting the messenger: Outsiders critical of your group are rejected regardless of argument quality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 386–395.
(2008). Language – A toolbox for sharing and influencing social reality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 38–47.
(2013). The art of exerting verbal influence through powerful lexical stimuli. In , Social cognition and communication (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2005). Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 469–492.
(1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906.
(1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior, 18, 1–24.
(2008). The TAR effect: When the ones who dislike become the ones who are disliked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1276–1289.
(1991). Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychologica, 78, 111–133.
(1997). Impact of negative advertising on evaluations of political candidates: The 1993 Canadian federal election. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 205–223.
(1989). An exploration of voter responses to political advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 18, 14–22.
(2005). Why being right is not enough: Predicting defensiveness in the face of group criticism. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 301–334.
(2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365–383.
(2002). ‘‘It’s ok if we say it, but you can’t’’: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293–307.
(2008). Sugaring the pill: Assessing rhetorical strategies designed to minimize defensive reactions to group criticism. Human Communication Research, 34, 70–98.
(1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887–900.
(1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136.
(1982). The simulation heuristic. In , Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–208). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(2010). Atypicality and the two fundamental dimensions: Applying the negativity effect on warmth to group perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 484–489.
(2003). Effect of counterfactual and factual thinking on causal judgments. Thinking and Reasoning, 9, 245–265.
(2000). “I couldn’t have known”: Accountability, foreseeability and counterfactual denials of responsibility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 313–325.
(1998). The black-sheep effect: How positive and negative advertisements affect voters’ perceptions of the sponsor of the advertisement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1903–1915.
(2007). Judgments of voluntary and physical causes in causal chains: Probabilistic and social functionalist criteria for attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 879–901.
(1996). It could have been better or it might have been worse: Implications for blame assignment in rape cases. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 347–366.
(1971). The positive-negative asymmetry: On cognitive consistency and positivity bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 455–474.
(1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33–60.
(2010). Who says we are bad people? The impact of criticism source and attributional content on responses to group-based criticism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 524–36.
(1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61–79.
(1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 133–148.
(1993). Backlash effect in attack politics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 632–653.
(2002). Honesty and intelligence judgments of individuals and groups: The effects of entity-related behaviour diagnosticity and implicit theories. Social Cognition, 20, 136–169.
(1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689–699.
(1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131–142.
(1998). Spontaneous trait transference: Communicators take on the qualities they describe in others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 837–848.
(1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In , Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769.
(2004). Counterfactual thinking as a mechanism in narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 30, 301–328.
(2012). Mitigation as modification of illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 907–919.
(1999). Effects of other-profitability and self-profitability on evaluative judgements of behaviours. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 833–842.
(1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161–169.
(2005). Morality and competence in person and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188.
(2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139–1147.
(1993). Effects of information content and evaluative extremity on positivity and negativity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 327–336.
(2010). It could have been better: The effects of counterfactual communication on impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1251–1260.
(1995). Impression formation in informal conversations. Social Cognition, 13, 243–272.
(2008). Life’s recurring challenges and the fundamental dimensions: An integration and its implications for cultural differences and similarities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1083–1092.
(