The Mere Presence of a Cell Phone May be Distracting
Implications for Attention and Task Performance
Abstract
Research consistently demonstrates the active use of cell phones, whether talking or texting, to be distracting and contributes to diminished performance when multitasking (e.g., distracted driving or walking). Recent research also has indicated that simply the presence of a cell phone and what it might represent (i.e., social connections, broader social network, etc.) can be similarly distracting and have negative consequences in a social interaction. Results of two studies reported here provide further evidence that the “mere presence” of a cell phone may be sufficiently distracting to produce diminished attention and deficits in task-performance, especially for tasks with greater attentional and cognitive demands. The implications for such an unintended negative consequence may be quite wide-ranging (e.g., productivity in school and the work place).
References
1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(2014). Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 215–226.
(1986). Distraction/conflict theory: Progress and problems. In , Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 19, (pp. 1–40). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
(2009). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54, 927–931.
(2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 282–1293.
(2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: Norton.
(2012). 50 Wireless Quick Facts. Washington, DC: CTIA-The Wireless Association. Retrieved from www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/aid/10323
. (2008). Effects of simulator practice and real-world experience on cell-phone-related driver distraction. Human Factors, 50, 893–902.
(2008). The myth of multitasking: How “doing it all” gets nothing done. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(1992). A cancellation test: Its reliability in assessing attentional deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychological Medicine, 22, 885–901.
(2012). Cell phone activities 2012. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Cell-Activities.aspx
(2010). Costly cell phones: The impact of cell phone rings on academic performance. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 55–57.
(2009). Distractions, distractions: Does instant messaging affect college students’ performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 51–53.
(2012). Effects of classroom cell phone use on expected and actual learning. College Student Journal, 46, 323–332.
(1995). Construct validity in the Trail Making Test: What makes Part B harder? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 529–535.
(2002). Towards a (meta-)sociology of the digital sphere. Sociology in Switzerland: Towards Cybersociety and Vireal Social Relations. Zurich, Switzerland: Retrieved from socio.ch/intcom/t_hgeser13.htm
(2011). Cell phone use and grade point average among undergraduate university students. College Student Journal, 45, 544–549.
(2011). I can’t get my work done! How collaboration and social tools drain productivity. Milpitas, CA harmon.ie Retrieved from harmon.ie/Downloads/DistractionSurveyResults
. (1999). Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1011–1025.
(2010). Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 597–607.
(1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(2007). An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 614–621.
(2012). Accidents and close call situations connected to the use of mobile phones. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 75–82.
(2000). More than just talk on the move: A use-and-gratification study of the cellular phone. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 308–320.
(2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
(2004). The psychosocial aspects of mobile phone use amongst adolescents. InPsych, 26, 16–19.
(2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 188–197.
(2013). Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 57, 91–95.
(2010). Pedestrians, vehicles, and cell phones. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 589–594.
(2013). The mobile consumer: A global snapshot. Retrieved from www.prepaidmvno.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Mobile-Consumer-Report-2013.pdf
. (2012). Sleeping with your smartphone: How to break the 24/7 habit and change the way you work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
(2000). On the mobile: The effects of mobile telephones on social and individual life. Schaumburg, IL: Motorola Retrieved from web.archive.org/web/20070127165250/ www.motorola.com/mot/doc/0/267/MotDoc.pdf
(1991). The use of a rating scale of attentional behaviour. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 241–257.
(2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 1–10.
(1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271–276.
(1992). Trail Making Test: Manual for administration and scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.
(1985). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
(2009). The distracting effects of a ringing cell phone: An investigation of the laboratory and the classroom setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 513–521.
(2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958.
(2012). The best (and worst) of mobile connectivity. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Retrieved from pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Best-Worst-Mobile.aspx
(2011). Effects of cell-phone and text-message distractions on true and false recognition. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 351–358.
(2005). The cost of not paying attention: How interruptions impact knowledge worker productivity. New York, NY: Basex. Retrieved from iorgforum.org/wpcontent/uploads/2011/06/CostOfNotPayingAttention.BasexReport.pdf
(2005). Mobile phones and the evolution of social behavior. Behavior & Information Technology, 24, 111–129.
(2011). Distracted walking: Cell phones increase injury risk for college pedestrians. Journal of Safety Research, 42, 101–107.
(2007). Cell-phone-induced driver distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 128–131.
(2006). Comparing the cell-phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors, 48, 381–391.
(2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23–52.
(2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.
(1972). Unity and diversity of frontal lobe functions. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 32, 615–656.
(2012). Your life is fully mobile. New York, NY Time Magazine Retrieved from techland.time.com/2012/08/16/your-life-is-fully-mobile/
. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
(2008). Families without borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions. Sociology, 42, 635–652.
(2011). Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organization Studies, 32, 941–961.
(2013). Female college students’ media use and academic outcomes – results from a longitudinal cohort study. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 219–232.
(2008). Over-connected? A qualitative exploration of the relationship between Australian youth and their mobile phones. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 77–92.
(2006). Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society, 8, 53–72.
(2010). Psychological foundations of cell-phone related distracted driving behavior: Implications for traffic safety culture [Report]. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
(2013). Possession attachment predicts cell phone use while driving. Health Psychology, 32, 379–387.
(2013). An evaluation of the effectiveness of voice-to-text programs at reducing incidences of distracted driving. Report SWUTC/13/600451–00011-1. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute. Retrieved from tti.tamu.edu/group/cts/files/2013/04/voice-to-text-Yager-Apr23.pdf
(1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.
(