Macho Nachos
The Implicit Effects of Gendered Food Packaging on Preferences for Healthy and Unhealthy Foods
Abstract
Abstract. The present studies examine how culturally held stereotypes about gender (that women eat more healthfully than men) implicitly influence food preferences. In Study 1, priming masculinity led both male and female participants to prefer unhealthy foods, while priming femininity led both male and female participants to prefer healthy foods. Study 2 extended these effects to gendered food packaging. When the packaging and healthiness of the food were gender schema congruent (i.e., feminine packaging for a healthy food, masculine packaging for an unhealthy food) both male and female participants rated the product as more attractive, said that they would be more likely to purchase it, and even rated it as tasting better compared to when the product was stereotype incongruent. In Study 3, packaging that explicitly appealed to gender stereotypes (“The muffin for real men”) reversed the schema congruity effect, but only among participants who scored high in psychological reactance.
References
2005). Social stereotypes and automatic goal pursuit. Social Cognition, 23, 465–490.
(2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18–28.
(2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 468–479.
(2008). The interactive effect of cultural symbols and human values on taste evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 294–308.
(2009). Suppressing secrecy through metacognitive ease: Cognitive fluency encourages self-disclosure. Psychological Science, 20, 1414–1420.
(2004). A “coca-cola” shape: Cultural change, body image, and eating disorders in San Andrés, Belize. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 28, 561–595.
(1992).
(Why subliminality does not matter to social psychology: Awareness of the stimulus versus awareness of its influence . In R. F. BornsteinT. S. PittmanEds., Perception without awareness (pp. 236–255) New York, NY: Guilford.2002). Losing consciousness: Automatic influences on consumer judgment, behavior, and motivation. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 280–285.
(1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
(2000).
(The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research . In H. T. ReisC. M. JuddEds.. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.
(2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.
(2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16, 593–605.
(1993). “What is she eating? The effects of meal size on impressions of a female eater. Sex Roles, 28, 335–344.
(1995). Body, self, and society: The view from Fiji. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
(2008). Dogs on the street, pumas on your feet: How cues in the environment influence product evaluation and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 1–14.
(1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
(2011). Body norms and fat stigma in global perspectives. Current Anthropology, 52, 269–276.
(2004). Food fight: The inside story of the food industry, America’s obesity crisis, and what we can do about it. Chicago, IL: Contemporary Books.
(2005). The role of conscious awareness in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 203–210.
(2002).
(Nonconscious motivations: Their activation, operation, and consequences . In A. TesserD. A. StapelJ. V. WoodEds., Self and motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 13–41) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.2007). Nonconscious relationship reactance: When significant others prime opposing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 719–726.
(1998). Gender differences in food preferences of young men and women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98, 104–110.
(2005). “I Am Us:” Negative stereotypes as collective threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 566–582.
(1999). The Anthropology of Food and Body: Gender, Meaning, and Power. New York, NY: Routledge.
(2005). Priming a new identity: Self-monitoring moderates the effects of non-self primes on self-judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 657–671.
(2002). Choice preferences without inferences: Subconscious priming of risk attitudes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 251–262.
(1995). Food and Nutrition: Customs and Culture, 2nd ed.. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
(1980). What does the schema concept buy us? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 543–557.
(1982).
(Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception . In M. S. ClarkS. T. FiskeEds., Affect and cognition, 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 55–78) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.2002). Non-conscious influences on consumer choice. Marketing Letters, 13, 269–279.
(1999). “I” value freedom but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321–326.
(2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
(2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728.
(1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.
(1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628.
(2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 111–135.
(1996). Refinement of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 173–182.
(1989). A psychological reactance scale: Development, factor structure and reliability. Psychological Reports, 64, 1323–1326.
(2002). Religion in life and society. Dunstable: Folens Limited.
(2008). Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 819–831.
(1987). The role of consciousness in priming effects on categorization: Assimilation versus contrast as a function of awareness of the priming task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 411–429.
(2012). Overweight people have low weight bias, while overweight nations have high weight bias. PLoS One, 8, e83543.
(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
(1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 39–54.
(1980). Such a Pretty Face: Being Fat in America. New York, NY: Norton.
(1990). Assimilation and contrast effects in spontaneous trait inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 224–240.
(2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.
(2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593–10597.
(2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311–342.
(1996). The moderating role of prior knowledge in schema-based product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 177–192.
(2006). Slow food revolution. New York, NY: Rizzoli.
(2004). Feeding desire: Fatness, beauty, and sexuality among a Saharan people. London, UK: Routledge.
(2006). The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing, 70, 170–184.
(1996).
(Socioiocultural influences on human food selection . In E. D. CapaldiEd., Why we eat what we eat: The psychology of eating (pp. 233–263) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.2003). Food and life, pleasure and worry, among American college students: Gender differences and regional similarities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 132–141.
(1999). Attitudes to food and the role of food in life: Comparisons of Flemish Belgium, France, Japan and the United States. Appetite, 33, 163–180.
(1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.
(2003). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 661–681.
(2005). You can’t always get what you want: Social class, agency and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720.
(1994). The sweetness of fat: Health, procreation, and sociability in rural Jamaica. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
(1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.
(1993). Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 53–62.
(2008). Varieties of social cognition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 293–322.
(2002). Sensory suggestiveness and labeling: Do soy labels bias taste? Journal of Sensory Studies, 17, 483–491.
(2000). How soy labeling influences preference and taste. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 3, 85–94.
(2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826.
(2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgments of value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 121–135.
(