Yes I Can!
Effects of Gender Fair Job Descriptions on Children’s Perceptions of Job Status, Job Difficulty, and Vocational Self-Efficacy
Abstract
Many countries face the problem of skill shortage in traditionally male occupations. Individuals’ development of vocational interests and employment goals starts as early as in middle childhood and is strongly influenced by perceptions of job accessibility (status and difficulty) and self-efficacy beliefs. In this study, we tested a linguistic intervention to strengthen children’s self-efficacy toward stereotypically male occupations. Two classroom experiments with 591 primary school students from two different linguistic backgrounds (Dutch or German) showed that the presentation of occupational titles in pair forms (e.g., Ingenieurinnen und Ingenieure, female and male engineers), rather than in generic masculine forms (Ingenieure, plural for engineers), boosted children’s self-efficacy with regard to traditionally male occupations, with the effect fully being mediated by perceptions that the jobs are not as difficult as gender stereotypes suggest. The discussion focuses on linguistic interventions as a means to increase children’s self-efficacy toward traditionally male occupations.
References
2013). Do storybooks really break children’s gender stereotypes? Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 4, 986.
(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, London: Sage.
(2008). Workforce segregation and the gender wage gap: Is “women’s” work valued as highly as “men’s”? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1416–1441.
(2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
. (1990). Effect of experience with nontraditional workers on psychological and social dimensions of occupational sex-role stereotyping by elementary school children. Psychological Reports, 66, 1273–1282.
(1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–200.
(1974). The emergence of vocational expectations in preschool children. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4, 1–14.
(1993). Forword. In A. E. BeallR. J. SternbergEds., The psychology of gender (pp. 7–17). New York, NY: Guilford.
(1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960–970.
(2009). Gender development. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
(2009). How does our language shape the way we think? In M. BrockmanEd., What’s next? Dispatches on the future of science (pp. 116–129). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
(2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. GentnerS. Goldin-MeadowEds., Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition (pp. 61–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1989). Men’s work, women’s work. A sociological history of the sexual division of labour in employment. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
(1998). Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen
([Can geophysicians be women? Generic terms in German] . Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 26, 265–283.1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(1995). Das Genus, die Grammatik und – der Mensch: Geschlechterdifferenz in der Sprachwissenschaft
([Gender differences in linguistics] . In H. BussmannR. HofEds. Genus. Zur Geschlechterdifferenz in den Kulturwissenschaften (pp. 114–160). Stuttgart, Germany: Körner.1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423.
(2005). Impact de la féminisation lexicale des professions sur l’auto-efficacité des élèves: une remise en cause de l’universalisme masculin?
([Occupational self-efficacy as a function of grammatical gender in French] . L’Année Psychologique, 105, 249–272.2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82, 766–779.
(2010). Through the language glass: Why the world looks different in other languages. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
(2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.
(1980). Career awareness in young children. Communication Research and Broadcasting, 3, 36–75.
(2006). Richtiges und gutes Deutsch
. ([Correct and good German] Vol. 9, Mannheim, Germany: Dudenverlag.1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.
(1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 915–928.
(2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. EckesH. M. TrautnerEds., The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In J. S. CeciW. M. WilliamsEds., Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate evidence (pp. 199–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 195–201.
(1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. SpenceEd., Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
(1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.
(2008). Geschlechtergerechter Sprachgebrauch beim Europäischen Parlament
. ([Gender-specific language use in the European Parliament] Retrieved from Swiss Cabinet www.bk.admin.ch/themen/lang/05225/05235/index.html2011). Gender differences in estimated salaries: A UK study. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 623–630.
(2008). Au-pairs are rarely male: Role names’ gender stereotype information across three languages. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 40, 206–212.
(1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545–579.
(2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. In S. D. BrownEd., Career choice and development (pp. 85–148). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(2005). Using Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise in career guidance and counseling. In S. D. BrownR. W. LentEds., Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 71–100). New York, NY: Wiley.
(2011). Gender representation in language: More than meets the eye. In R. M. MishraN. SrinivasanEds., Language and cognition: State of the art (pp. 72–92). München, Germany: Lincom AP.
(2012). The masculine form and its competing interpretations in French: When linking grammatically masculine role names to female referents is difficult. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 395–408.
(2008). There is no generic masculine in French and German: When beauticians, musicians and mechanics are all men. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 464–485.
(2004). Why German school students don’t like math and sciences. A self-to-prototype matching approach. Learning and Instruction, 14, 51–67.
(2005). Child vocational development: A review and reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 385–419.
(2008). Career adaptability in childhood. Career Development Quarterly, 57, 63–74.
(2000). Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen
([Are women included? An empirical study of the generic masculine and its alternatives] . Zeitschrift für Sprache und Kognition, 19, 3–13.2003). Auch einfühlsame Studenten sind Männer: Das generische Maskulinum und die mentale Repräsentation von Personen
([Sensitive students are men too: The generic masculine and the mental representation of persons] . Verhaltenstherapie und Psychosoziale Praxis, 35, 285–291.1993). Eine Sprache für beide Geschlechter. Richtlinien für einen nicht-sexistischen Sprachgebrauch
([A language for both sexes. Guidelines for a non-sexist language] . Bonn, Germany: Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission.2003). The role of status in producing depressed entitlement in women’s and men’s pay allocations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 330–337.
(1984). Children’s understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20, 697–706.
(2004). Gender markedness of language: The impact of grammatical and nonlinguistic information on the mental representation of person information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 272–307.
(2011). Processing grammatical gender of role nouns: Further evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 998–1014.
(2002). Diminishing returns: The effects of income on the content of stereotypes of wage earners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1538–1545.
(1989). Occupational prestige as a function of occupants’ gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 681–688.
(2007). How the image of math and science affects the development of academic interests. In M. PrenzelEd., Studies on the educational quality of schools (pp. 283–297). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
(2006). What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 761–780.
(2001). Pink and blue collar jobs: Children’s judgements of job status and job aspirations in relation to sex of worker. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 346–363.
(2002). Language at work: Children’s gendered interpretations of occupational titles. Child Development, 73, 810–828.
(1993). Gender-schematic processing in children: the role of initial interpretations of stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 29, 141–149.
(1971). Sex differences in the expression of vocational aspirations by elementary school children. Developmental Psychology, 5, 366.
(2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.
(2000). How early is too early to begin life career planning? The importance of the elementary school years. Journal of Career Development, 27, 89–101.
(1997). Gender differences in children’s and adolescents’ perceptions of influences on their career development. School Counselor, 44, 368–376.
(1986). Reducing occupational circumscription. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 20, 250–254.
(2014). How gender-fair are schoolbooks in Germany in the 21st century? An analysis of language and illustrations in schoolbooks for mathematics and German. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 387–407.
(1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.
(2007). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(2007). Children’s and adolescents’ developing perceptions of gender inequality. Social Development, 16, 682–699.
(2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration website. Group Dynamics, 6, 101–115.
(2009). Student gender stereotypes: contrasting the perceived maleness and femaleness of mathematics and language. Educational Psychology, 29, 385–405.
(2008). Children’s vocational development: A research rationale. The Career Development Quarterly, 57, 25–37.
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
(2012). The gendering of language: A comparison of gender equality in countries with gendered, natural gender, and genderless languages. Sex Roles, 66, 268–281.
(2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.
(2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288.
(2004). Personenbezeichnungsmodelle auf dem Prüfstand. Lösungsmöglichkeiten für das Genus-Sexus-Problem auf Textebene
([Putting gender neutral reference terms to the test: Constructive solutions to the problem of grammatical vs. referential gender on the textual level] . Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212, 40–54.2006). Gender development. In N. EisenbergEd., Handbook of child psychology: Personality and social development, Vol. 3, (pp. 858–932). New York, NY: Wiley.
(2012). Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 486–499.
(1984). Review of 21 cause and effect studies. Psychological Documents, 76, 183–193.
(1986). Effects of sex-fair reading materials on pupils’ attitudes, comprehension, and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 105–116.
(1991). The career development of 10 year olds. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 25, 172–181.
(2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. FiedlerEd., Social communication. Frontiers of social psychology (pp. 163–187). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2001). Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen
([Effects of masculine generics and alternative forms of speech on the cognitive inclusion of women] . Psychologische Rundschau, 52, 131–140.2001). Name your favorite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 464–469.
(2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex Roles, 64, 324–335.
(2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 947–963.
(2008). Truck driver or nurse? The impact of gender roles and occupational status on children’s occupational preferences. Sex Roles, 58, 848–863.
(1974). Effects of additional women professionals on ratings of occupational prestige and desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 86–89.
(1991). A retrospective study of career development: 1. Relationship among first aspirations, parental occupations, and current occupations. Psychological Reports, 68, 287–290.
(1993). Do children’s career aspirations predict adult occupations? An answer from a secondary analysis of a longitudinal study. Psychological Reports, 72, 368–370.
(1994). Does childhood matter? A rationale for the inclusion of childhood in theories of career decision. California Association for Counseling and Development Journal, 14, 35–44.
(1982). Frauensprache: Sprache der Veränderung
([Language of women: Language of change] . Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer.2013). Changing (s)expectations: How gender fair job descriptions impact children’s perceptions and interest regarding traditionally male occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 208–220.
(2012). Choosing STEM. Young people’s educational choice for technical and scientific studies. Retrieved from Flemish Council for Science and Innovation www.vrwi.be/pdf/Choosing_20STEM._20Young_20people_27s_20educational_20choice_20for_20technical_20and_20scientific_20studies.pdf
. (2009). ¿Qué? Quoi? Do languages with grammatical gender promote sexist attitudes? Sex Roles, 61, 634–643.
(2005). Children’s career development: A research review from a learning perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 119–132.
(2007). Children’s career development learning: A foundation for lifelong career development. In V. B. SkorikovW. PattonEds., Career development in childhood and adolescence (pp. 29–46). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
(2010). Gender, values, and occupational interests among children, adolescents, and adults. Child Development, 81, 757–777.
(2012). Building blocks of bias: Gender composition predicts male and female group members’ evaluations of each other and the group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1209–1212.
(2010). The masculinity of money: Nonconscious stereotypes predict gender differences in estimated salaries. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 107–120.
(2010). The Global Gender Report. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2010.pdf
. (