Skip to main content
Original Article

Yes I Can!

Effects of Gender Fair Job Descriptions on Children’s Perceptions of Job Status, Job Difficulty, and Vocational Self-Efficacy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000229

Many countries face the problem of skill shortage in traditionally male occupations. Individuals’ development of vocational interests and employment goals starts as early as in middle childhood and is strongly influenced by perceptions of job accessibility (status and difficulty) and self-efficacy beliefs. In this study, we tested a linguistic intervention to strengthen children’s self-efficacy toward stereotypically male occupations. Two classroom experiments with 591 primary school students from two different linguistic backgrounds (Dutch or German) showed that the presentation of occupational titles in pair forms (e.g., Ingenieurinnen und Ingenieure, female and male engineers), rather than in generic masculine forms (Ingenieure, plural for engineers), boosted children’s self-efficacy with regard to traditionally male occupations, with the effect fully being mediated by perceptions that the jobs are not as difficult as gender stereotypes suggest. The discussion focuses on linguistic interventions as a means to increase children’s self-efficacy toward traditionally male occupations.

References

  • Abad, C., & Pruden, S. M. (2013). Do storybooks really break children’s gender stereotypes? Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 4, 986. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, London: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alksnis, C., Desmarais, S., & Curtis, J. (2008). Workforce segregation and the gender wage gap: Is “women’s” work valued as highly as “men’s”? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1416–1441. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychological Association . (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bailey, B. A., & Nihlen, A. S. (1990). Effect of experience with nontraditional workers on psychological and social dimensions of occupational sex-role stereotyping by elementary school children. Psychological Reports, 66, 1273–1282. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–200. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barclay, L. K. (1974). The emergence of vocational expectations in preschool children. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4, 1–14. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berscheid, E. (1993). Forword. In A. E. BeallR. J. SternbergEds., The psychology of gender (pp. 7–17). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960–970. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender development. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boroditsky, L. (2009). How does our language shape the way we think? In M. BrockmanEd., What’s next? Dispatches on the future of science (pp. 116–129). New York, NY: Vintage Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. GentnerS. Goldin-MeadowEds., Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition (pp. 61–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bradley, H. (1989). Men’s work, women’s work. A sociological history of the sexual division of labour in employment. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Braun, F., Gottburgsen, A., Sczesny, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1998). Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen [Can geophysicians be women? Generic terms in German]. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 26, 265–283. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bussmann, H. (1995). Das Genus, die Grammatik und – der Mensch: Geschlechterdifferenz in der Sprachwissenschaft [Gender differences in linguistics]. In H. BussmannR. HofEds. Genus. Zur Geschlechterdifferenz in den Kulturwissenschaften (pp. 114–160). Stuttgart, Germany: Körner. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chatard, A., Guimond, S., & Martinot, D. (2005). Impact de la féminisation lexicale des professions sur l’auto-efficacité des élèves: une remise en cause de l’universalisme masculin? [Occupational self-efficacy as a function of grammatical gender in French]. L’Année Psychologique, 105, 249–272. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cvencek, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82, 766–779. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deutscher, G. (2010). Through the language glass: Why the world looks different in other languages. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dorr, A., & Lesser, G. (1980). Career awareness in young children. Communication Research and Broadcasting, 3, 36–75. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Duden . (2006). Richtiges und gutes Deutsch [Correct and good German] Vol. 9, Mannheim, Germany: Dudenverlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 915–928. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. EckesH. M. TrautnerEds., The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eccles, J. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In J. S. CeciW. M. WilliamsEds., Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate evidence (pp. 199–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eccles, J. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 195–201. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eccles, J., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. SpenceEd., Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • European Commission . (2008). Geschlechtergerechter Sprachgebrauch beim Europäischen Parlament [Gender-specific language use in the European Parliament] Retrieved from Swiss Cabinet www.bk.admin.ch/themen/lang/05225/05235/index.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A. F., & Wilson, E. (2011). Gender differences in estimated salaries: A UK study. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 623–630. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabriel, U., Gygax, P., Sarrasin, O., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2008). Au-pairs are rarely male: Role names’ gender stereotype information across three languages. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 40, 206–212. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545–579. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. In S. D. BrownEd., Career choice and development (pp. 85–148). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). Using Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise in career guidance and counseling. In S. D. BrownR. W. LentEds., Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 71–100). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gygax, P., & Gabriel, U. (2011). Gender representation in language: More than meets the eye. In R. M. MishraN. SrinivasanEds., Language and cognition: State of the art (pp. 72–92). München, Germany: Lincom AP. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Lévy, A., Pool, E., Grivel, M., & Pedrazzini, E. (2012). The masculine form and its competing interpretations in French: When linking grammatically masculine role names to female referents is difficult. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 395–408. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2008). There is no generic masculine in French and German: When beauticians, musicians and mechanics are all men. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 464–485. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Why German school students don’t like math and sciences. A self-to-prototype matching approach. Learning and Instruction, 14, 51–67. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hartung, P. J., Porfeli, E. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2005). Child vocational development: A review and reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 385–419. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hartung, P. J., Porfeli, E. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2008). Career adaptability in childhood. Career Development Quarterly, 57, 63–74. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heise, E. (2000). Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen [Are women included? An empirical study of the generic masculine and its alternatives]. Zeitschrift für Sprache und Kognition, 19, 3–13. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Heise, E. (2003). Auch einfühlsame Studenten sind Männer: Das generische Maskulinum und die mentale Repräsentation von Personen [Sensitive students are men too: The generic masculine and the mental representation of persons]. Verhaltenstherapie und Psychosoziale Praxis, 35, 285–291. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hellinger, M., & Bierbach, C. (1993). Eine Sprache für beide Geschlechter. Richtlinien für einen nicht-sexistischen Sprachgebrauch [A language for both sexes. Guidelines for a non-sexist language]. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hogue, M., & Yoder, J. (2003). The role of status in producing depressed entitlement in women’s and men’s pay allocations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 330–337. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyde, J. S. (1984). Children’s understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20, 697–706. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Irmen, L., & Roßberg, N. (2004). Gender markedness of language: The impact of grammatical and nonlinguistic information on the mental representation of person information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 272–307. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Irmen, L., & Schumann, E. (2011). Processing grammatical gender of role nouns: Further evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 998–1014. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). Diminishing returns: The effects of income on the content of stereotypes of wage earners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1538–1545. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kanekar, S., Maharukh, B., & Kolsawalla, T. (1989). Occupational prestige as a function of occupants’ gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 681–688. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kessels, U., & Hannover, B. (2007). How the image of math and science affects the development of academic interests. In M. PrenzelEd., Studies on the educational quality of schools (pp. 283–297). Münster, Germany: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kessels, U., Rau, M., & Hannover, B. (2006). What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 761–780. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liben, L. S., Bigler, R. S., & Krogh, H. R. (2001). Pink and blue collar jobs: Children’s judgements of job status and job aspirations in relation to sex of worker. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 346–363. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liben, L. S., Bigler, R. S., & Krogh, H. R. (2002). Language at work: Children’s gendered interpretations of occupational titles. Child Development, 73, 810–828. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liben, L. S., & Signorella, M. L. (1993). Gender-schematic processing in children: the role of initial interpretations of stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 29, 141–149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Looft, W. (1971). Sex differences in the expression of vocational aspirations by elementary school children. Developmental Psychology, 5, 366. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Magnuson, C., & Starr, M. (2000). How early is too early to begin life career planning? The importance of the elementary school years. Journal of Career Development, 27, 89–101. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McMahon, M., & Patton, W. (1997). Gender differences in children’s and adolescents’ perceptions of influences on their career development. School Counselor, 44, 368–376. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, R. R. (1986). Reducing occupational circumscription. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 20, 250–254. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moser, F., & Hannover, B. (2014). How gender-fair are schoolbooks in Germany in the 21st century? An analysis of language and illustrations in schoolbooks for mathematics and German. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 387–407. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neff, K. D., Cooper, C. E., & Woodruff, A. L. (2007). Children’s and adolescents’ developing perceptions of gender inequality. Social Development, 16, 682–699. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration website. Group Dynamics, 6, 101–115. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plante, I., Théorét, M., & Favreau, O. E. (2009). Student gender stereotypes: contrasting the perceived maleness and femaleness of mathematics and language. Educational Psychology, 29, 385–405. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Porfeli, E. J., Hartung, P. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2008). Children’s vocational development: A research rationale. The Career Development Quarterly, 57, 25–37. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prewitt-Freilino, J. L., Caswell, T. A., & Laakso, E. K. (2012). The gendering of language: A comparison of gender equality in countries with gendered, natural gender, and genderless languages. Sex Roles, 66, 268–281. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothmund, J., & Scheele, B. (2004). Personenbezeichnungsmodelle auf dem Prüfstand. Lösungsmöglichkeiten für das Genus-Sexus-Problem auf Textebene [Putting gender neutral reference terms to the test: Constructive solutions to the problem of grammatical vs. referential gender on the textual level]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212, 40–54. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Ruble, D. N., Martin, C., & Berenbaum, S. (2006). Gender development. In N. EisenbergEd., Handbook of child psychology: Personality and social development, Vol. 3, (pp. 858–932). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sainz, M., & Eccles, J. (2012). Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 486–499. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schau, C. G., & Scott, K. P. (1984). Review of 21 cause and effect studies. Psychological Documents, 76, 183–193. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scott, K. (1986). Effects of sex-fair reading materials on pupils’ attitudes, comprehension, and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 105–116. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seligman, L., Weinstock, L., & Heflin, E. (1991). The career development of 10 year olds. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 25, 172–181. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. FiedlerEd., Social communication. Frontiers of social psychology (pp. 163–187). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stahlberg, D., & Sczesny, S. (2001). Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen [Effects of masculine generics and alternative forms of speech on the cognitive inclusion of women]. Psychologische Rundschau, 52, 131–140. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stahlberg, D., Sczesny, S., & Braun, F. (2001). Name your favorite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 464–469. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C., & Jelenec, P. (2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex Roles, 64, 324–335. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 947–963. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teig, S., & Susskind, J. E. (2008). Truck driver or nurse? The impact of gender roles and occupational status on children’s occupational preferences. Sex Roles, 58, 848–863. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Touhey, J. (1974). Effects of additional women professionals on ratings of occupational prestige and desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 86–89. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trice, A. (1991). A retrospective study of career development: 1. Relationship among first aspirations, parental occupations, and current occupations. Psychological Reports, 68, 287–290. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Trice, A., & McClellan, N. (1993). Do children’s career aspirations predict adult occupations? An answer from a secondary analysis of a longitudinal study. Psychological Reports, 72, 368–370. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Trice, A. D., & McClellan, N. (1994). Does childhood matter? A rationale for the inclusion of childhood in theories of career decision. California Association for Counseling and Development Journal, 14, 35–44. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Trömel-Plötz, S. (1982). Frauensprache: Sprache der Veränderung [Language of women: Language of change]. Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vervecken, D., Hannover, B., & Wolter, I. (2013). Changing (s)expectations: How gender fair job descriptions impact children’s perceptions and interest regarding traditionally male occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 208–220. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • VRWI . (2012). Choosing STEM. Young people’s educational choice for technical and scientific studies. Retrieved from Flemish Council for Science and Innovation www.vrwi.be/pdf/Choosing_20STEM._20Young_20people_27s_20educational_20choice_20for_20technical_20and_20scientific_20studies.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wasserman, B. D., & Weseley, A. J. (2009). ¿Qué? Quoi? Do languages with grammatical gender promote sexist attitudes? Sex Roles, 61, 634–643. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, M., & McMahon, M. (2005). Children’s career development: A research review from a learning perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 119–132. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, M., & McMahon, M. (2007). Children’s career development learning: A foundation for lifelong career development. In V. B. SkorikovW. PattonEds., Career development in childhood and adolescence (pp. 29–46). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weisgram, E. S., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2010). Gender, values, and occupational interests among children, adolescents, and adults. Child Development, 81, 757–777. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • West, T. V., Heilman, M. E., Gullett, L., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Magee, J. C. (2012). Building blocks of bias: Gender composition predicts male and female group members’ evaluations of each other and the group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1209–1212. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, M., Paluck, E., & Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2010). The masculinity of money: Nonconscious stereotypes predict gender differences in estimated salaries. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 107–120. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • World Economic Forum . (2010). The Global Gender Report. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2010.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar