Skip to main content
Replication

Relationship of Moral Foundations to Political Liberalism-Conservatism and Left-Right Orientation in a Finnish Representative Sample

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000297

Abstract. In moral foundations research, two single-item measures of political orientation – with anchors labeled “liberal-conservative” or “left-right” – have been alternatively used. Using a Finnish representative sample, we employed both measures. High conservatism was associated with binding foundations (loyalty, authority, and sanctity), while the associations with the individualizing foundations (harm and fairness) were practically zero. By contrast, the left-right dimension was not associated with the sanctity foundation, but was associated with all other foundations. The measures of political orientation were interchangeable only for fairness; harm was more strongly associated with the left-right dimension, and all binding foundations were more strongly associated with the liberal-conservative dimension. This suggests that at least in some countries, the liberal-conservative and left-right measures are not interchangeable.

References

  • Aspelund, A., Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2013). Political conservatism and left-right orientation in 28 eastern and western European Countries. Political Psychology, 34, 409–417. doi: 10.1111/pops.12000 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 641–678. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfp075 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davies, C. L., Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the moral foundations questionnaire: Independent scale validation in a New Zealand sample. Social Psychology, 45, 431–436. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000201 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Dawson, S. L., & Tyson, G. A. (2012). Will morality or political ideology determine attitudes to climate change? Australian Community Psychologist, 24, 8–25. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98–109. doi: 10.1080/10478400903028540 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Federico, C. M., Weber, C. R., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. (2013). Mapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Political Psychology, 34, 589–610. doi: 10.1111/pops.12006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldman, S. (2013). Political ideology. In L. HuddyD. O. SearsJ. S. LevyEds., Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 591–626). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 337–358. doi: 10.1111/pops.12055 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and political theory: A conceptual approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. B., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi: 10.1037/a0015141 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. doi: 10.1037/a0021847 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind. Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Vintage Books/Random House. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., Xu, X., & Peterson, J. B. (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 655–664. doi: 10.1177/0146167210366854 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. (2009). “Elective affinities”: On the psychological bases of left-right differences. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 129–141. doi: 10.1080/10478400903028599 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A. (2015, November 24). Measuring model fit [Online resource]. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Knight, K. (2006). Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century. American Political Science Review, 100, 619–626. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koleva, S., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2011). From left to right: How the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 546–558. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02016.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 1031. doi: 10.1037/a0036170 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nilsson, A., & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The Moral Foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.049 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011). Basic personal values and the meaning of left-right political orientations in 20 countries. Political Psychology, 32, 537–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Caprara, M. G., … Zaleski, Z. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36, 899–930. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9255-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strack, F., Schwarz, N., & Wänke, M. (1991). Semantic and pragmatic aspects of context effects in social and psychological research. Social Cognition, 9, 111–125. doi: 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Leeuwen, F., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 169–173. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar