Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Article

A New Measure of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory

Factor Structure and Validity of the rRST Questionnaire in the PATH Through Life Project

Published Online:December 22, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000502

Abstract

Abstract. The reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) proposes that neurobiological systems mediate behavior and their functioning can be associated with personality. The functions and associations of RST systems were revised into fight–flight–freeze system (FFFS), behavioral approach/activation system (rBAS), and behavioral inhibition system (rBIS); however, there is limited study of the revised systems due to lack of validated measures. We investigated scale structure, sex invariance, and psychometric properties of the revised RST questionnaire (rRST-Q). The rRST-Q showed good fit as a 5-factor structure with free interfactor correlations and was sex invariant, and associations with personality and mental health measures were consistent with theory and literature. The rRST-Q is a reliable measure, and its use will help understand the link between brain, personality, and behavior.

References

  • Anstey, K. J., Christensen, H., Butterworth, P., Easteal, S., Mackinnon, A., Jacomb, T., Maxwell, K., Rodgers, B., Windsor, T., Cherbuin, N., & Jorm, A. F. (2012). Cohort profile: The PATH through life project. International Journal of Epidemiology, 41(4), 951–960. 10.1093/ije/dyr025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Artistico, D., & Laicardi, C. (2002). Stability of the Eysenck personality questionnaire for a cross-sectional sample. Psychologial Reports, 90(2), 546–548. 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.2.546 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beck, I., Smits, D. J. M., Claes, L., Vandereycken, W., & Bijttebier, P. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation system scales and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 407–412. 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, R. J., Yudko, E. B., Rodgers, R. J., & Blanchard, D. C. (1993). Defense system psychopharmacology: An ethological approach to the pharmacology of fear and anxiety. Behavioural Brain Research, 58(1), 155–165. 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90100-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. 10.1037//0022-3514.67.2.319 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, A., Gomez, R., & Aucote, H. (2007). The behavioural inhibition system and behavioural approach system (BIS/BAS) Scales: Measurement and structural invariance across adults and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 295–305. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 317–332. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P. J. (Ed.). (2008). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Cambridge University Press. https://go.exlibris.link/z1ty1fJH First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P. J., & Cooper, A. J. (2016). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1427–1440. 10.1037/pas0000273 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology compass, 7(3), 158–175. 10.1111/spc3.12016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P. J., & Perkins, A. M. (2006). The role of theory in the psychophysiology of personality: From Ivan Pavlov to Jeffrey Gray. International Journal of Psychophysiology 62(3), 367–376. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.01.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P. J., Pickering, A. D., & Gray, J. A. (1995). Personality and reinforcement in associative and instrumental learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47–71. 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00013-V First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, J. P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Age changes in personality and their origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 26–28. 10.1037/003-2909.132.1.26 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Der-Avakian, A., & Markou, A. (2011). The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(1), 68–77. 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Espinoza Oyarce, D. A., Burns, R., Butterworth, P., & Cherbuin, N. (2021). Bridging classical and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory research: A longitudinal analysis of a large population study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 737117. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737117 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Espinoza Oyarce, D. A., Shaw, M. E., Alateeq, K., & Cherbuin, N. (2020). Volumetric brain differences in clinical depression in association with anxiety: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 45(5), 190156. 10.1503/jpn.190156 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eysenck, H. J., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29. 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, D., Bridges, K., Duncan-Jones, P., & Grayson, D. (1988). Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ, 297(6653), 897–899. 10.1136/bmj.297.6653.897 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8(3), 249–266. 10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heym, N., Ferguson, E., & Lawrence, C. (2008). An evaluation of the relationship between Gray's revised RST and Eysenck's PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 709–715. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jackson, C. J. (2009). Jackson-5 scales of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST) and their application to dysfunctional real world outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 556–569. 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, S. L., Turner, R. J., & Iwata, N. (2003). BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: An epidemiological study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25(1), 25–36. 10.1023/A:1022247919288 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36(4), 409–426. 10.1007/BF02291366 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Henderson, A. S., Jacomb, P. A., Korten, A. E., & Rodgers, B. (1999). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 49–58. 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00143-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klinger-König, J., Hertel, J., Terock, J., Völzke, H., Van der Auwera, S., & Grabe, H. J. (2018). Predicting physical and mental health symptoms: Additive and interactive effects of difficulty identifying feelings, neuroticism and extraversion. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 115, 14–23. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.10.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kramer, S. L., & Rodriguez, B. F. (2018). A comparison of reinforcement sensitivity theory measures: Unique associations with social interaction anxiety and social observation anxiety. Assessment, 25(5), 627–639. 10.1177/1073191116654003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krupić, D., Corr, P. J., Ručević, S., Križanić, V., & Gračanin, A. (2016). Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 19–24. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. 10.1007/bf02294825 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–515. 10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. 10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pagliaccio, D., Luking, K. R., Anokhin, A. P., Gotlib, I. H., Hayden, E. P., Olino, T. M., Peng, C. Z., Hajcak, G., & Barch, D. M. (2016). Revising the BIS/BAS Scale to study development: Measurement invariance and normative effects of age and sex from childhood through adulthood. Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 429–442. 10.1037/pas0000186 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pickering, A. D., & Gray, J. A. (1999). The neuroscience of personality. In L. A. PervinO. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Poythress, N. G., Skeem, J. L., Weir, J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Douglas, K. S., Edens, J. F., & Kennealy, P. J. (2008). Psychometric properties of Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales in a large sample of offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 732–737. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.021 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.6.0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer‐Loeber, M., & Liu, J. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159–171. 10.1002/ab.20115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reuter, M., Cooper, A. J., Smillie, L. D., Markett, S., & Montag, C. (2015). A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: Psychometric criteria and genetic validation. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, Article 38. 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Revelle, W. (2018). Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 1.8.12). Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scollon, C. N., & Diener, E. (2006). Love, work, and changes in extraversion and neuroticism over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1152–1165. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1152 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smederevac, S., Mitrović, D., Čolović, P., & Nikolašević Ž. (2014). Validation of the measure of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory constructs. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(1), 12–21. 10.1027/1614-0001/a000121 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Smillie, L. D., Jackson, C. J., & Dalgleish, L. I. (2006). Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White's (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 1039–1050. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smillie, L. D., Pickering, A. D., & Jackson, C. J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 320–335. 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Svetina, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2017). Multidimensional measurement invariance in an international context: Fit measure performance with many groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(7), 991–1008. 10.1177/0022022117717028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Svetina, D., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2019). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Structural Equation Modeling, 27(1), 111–130. 10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Tol, M.-J., van der Wee, N. J., van den Heuvel, O. A., Nielen, M. M., Demenescu, L. R., Aleman, A., Renken, R., van Buchem, M. A., Zitman, F. G., & Veltman, D. J. (2010). Regional brain volume in depression and anxiety disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(10), 1002–1011. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.121 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wardell, J. D., O'Connor, R. M., Read, J. P., & Colder, C. R. (2011). Behavioral approach system moderates the prospective association between the behavioral inhibition system and alcohol outcomes in college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(6), 1028–1036. 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.1028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weydmann, G., Hauck Filho, N., & Bizarro, L. (2020). Acquiescent responding can distort the factor structure of the BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109563. 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109563 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Whittle, S., Yücel, M., Yap, M. B. H., & Allen, N. B. (2011). Sex differences in the neural correlates of emotion: Evidence from neuroimaging. Biological Psychology, 87(3), 319–333. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.05.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Windsor, T. D., Pearson, E. L., & Butterworth, P. (2012). Age group differences and longitudinal changes in approach–avoidance sensitivity: Findings from an 8-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 646–654. 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.07.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wolpe, J., & Lang, P. J. (1964). A fear survey schedule for use in behaviour therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2(1), 27–30. 10.1016/0005-7967(64)90051-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • World Health Organization. (2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates (WHO/MSD/MER/2017.2). World Health Organization First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wu, H., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. 10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yu, R., Branje, S. J., Keijsers, L., & Meeus, W. H. (2011). Psychometric characteristics of Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales in Dutch adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(5), 500–507. 10.1080/00223891.2011.595745 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar