More Than Meets the ERN
Suppression of Confrontation Moderates the Effects of Sexism on Error-Related Negativity
Abstract
Abstract: Women may suppress behavior and emotions during sexism, impairing subsequent self-control. However, suppression likely depends on social reprisal versus benefit of confronting (i.e., social cost). Experiment 1 (N = 56) found behavioral self-control (i.e., Stroop task performance) was unaffected by sexism. Yet, sexism led to exaggerated amplitudes of the error-related negativity (ERN). Experiment 2 (N = 114) examined the role of confrontation in response to sexism, with women instructed to suppress confrontation during a sexist interaction exhibiting longer reaction times and lower ERN amplitudes. Conversely, women encouraged to confront sexism exhibited heightened ERN amplitudes, as found in Experiment 1, which were mediated by negative affect. The findings suggest sexism reduces women’s self-control, but only within environments that may suppress confrontation.
References
2018). How many trials does it take to get a significant ERP effect? It depends. Psychophysiology, 55(6), 1–16. 10.1111/psyp.13049
(2013). Behavioral control in alcohol use disorders: Relationships with severity. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 74(1), 141–151. 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.141
(1994). Localization of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 5(5), 303–305. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00630.x
(2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
(2010). The costs of caring: Gender identification increases threat following exposure to sexism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 159–165. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.015
(2015). Perpetuating online sexism offline: Anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 436–442. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.024
(2018). The error-related negativity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 200–204. 10.1177/1745691617715310
(2012). When do we confront? Perceptions of costs and benefits predict confronting discrimination on behalf of the self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(2), 210–226. 10.1177/0361684312440958
(2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 546–573. 10.1177/1745691616652873
(2009). The strength model of self-regulation failure and health-related behaviour. Health Psychology Review, 3(2), 208–238. 10.1080/17437190903414387
(2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 495–525. 10.1037/a0019486
(2012). What we’ve learned from mistakes: Insights from error-related brain activity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 101–106. 10.1177/0963721412436809
(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
(2010). Error-related negativity predicts academic performance. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 192–196. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00877.x
(2019). The past, present, and future of ego depletion. Social Psychology, 50(5-6), 370–378. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000398
(2007). Running on empty: Neural signals for self-control failure. Psychological Science, 18(11), 933–937. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02004.x
(2006). Stigma as Ego depletion: How being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychological Science, 17(3), 262–269. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01695.x
(2013). Experiencing discrimination increases risk taking. Psychological Science, 24(2), 131–139. 10.1177/0956797612448194
(2010). Ego depletion-is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1686–1693. 10.1177/0956797610384745
(2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. 10.1177/0146167201272010
(2000). Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: Negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 43–60. 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.43
(2013). Intergroup relations and health disparities: A social psychological perspective. Health Psychology, 32(5), 514–524. 10.1037/a0030358
(2018). Stigma, social identity threat, and health. In B. MajorJ. F. DovidioB. G. Link (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of stigma, discrimination, and health (pp. 85–103). Oxford University Press.
(2012). Approach-related left prefrontal EEG asymmetry predicts muted error-related negativity. Biological Psychology, 91(1), 96–102. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.005
(2009). The effect of trial-to-trial feedback on the error-related negativity and its relationship with anxiety. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(4), 427–433. 10.3758/CABN.9.4.427
(2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 531–554. 10.1037/a0016059
(2019). Sexism predicts alcohol use and motivations among college women with stronger alcohol identity. Social Cognition, 37(3), 341–354. 10.1521/soco.2019.37.3.341
(2014). “When the going gets tough, who keeps going?" Depletion sensitivity moderates the ego-depletion effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 647. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00647
(2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440–452. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440
(2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356. 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
(2016). Exercising self-control increases relative left frontal cortical activation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 282–288. 10.1093/scan/nsv112
(2016). Harmful workplace experiences and women’s occupational well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 10–40. 10.1177/0361684315599346
(1999). Excuse me — What did you just say?! Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 68–88. 10.1006/jesp.1998.1370
(2008). The effect of gender stereotype activation on challenge and threat motivational states. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 624–630. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.007
(2021). A multisite preregistered paradigmatic test of the ego-depletion effect. Psychological Science, 32(10), 1566–1581. 10.1177/095679762198973
(2017). Perceiving and confronting sexism: The causal role of gender identity salience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(1), 65–76. 10.1177/0361684316670628
(2014). Suppression (but not reappraisal) impairs subsequent error detection: An ERP study of emotion regulation's resource-depleting effect. PLoS ONE, 9(4), Article e96339. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096339
(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
(2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 15–30. 10.1111/0022-4537.00199
(2015). It’s just a (sexist) joke: Comparing reactions to sexist versus racist communications. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 28(2), 289–309. 10.1515/humor-2015-0025#
(