Self-Determined Intention to Vote and the Mediating Role of Politicized Identification
A Study on Italian Young Adults During the 2018 Elections
Abstract
Abstract. This study tested the Politicized Identification Model of Intention to Vote as an integrated model of political participation and self-determination theory to understand what motivates young people to vote and inform policy and communication efforts. The results of path analyses on survey data from a representative sample of 1,960 young Italians (age range, 20–35 years) revealed that participative efficacy positively and negatively predicted internalized motivation and amotivation, respectively. In addition, politicized identification mediated the positive relation between the internalized motivations and intention to vote. Finally, amotivation negatively predicted voting intention. Civic education campaigns should promote young people’s awareness that they can contribute to society by voting (i.e., participative efficacy) and support internalized motivations to vote.
References
1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
(2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 43–59. 10.1177/1368430215581430
(2018). Online discussion and the moral pathway to identity politicization and collective action. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 143–158. 10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1507
(2010). Community psychology, political efficacy, and trust. Political Psychology, 31(1), 59–84. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00734.x
(2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43(1), 155–165. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006
(2017). Becoming politicized: Political socialization and participation of young people in the December 2008 revolt in Greece. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(4), 324–335. 10.1027/2151-2604/a000311
(2015). An integrative model of political and civic participation: Linking the macro, social and psychological levels of explanation. In M. BarrettB. Zani (Eds.), Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 162–187). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
(2011). Committed dis(s)idents: Participation in radical collective action fosters disidentification with the broader in-group but enhances political identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1104–1116. 10.1177/0146167211407076
(2009). The frontiers of democracy: The right to vote and its limits. Springer.
(2015). Party identification and vote choice in partisan and nonpartisan elections. Political Behavior, 37(1), 43–66. 10.1007/s11109-013-9260-2
(2011). Distrusting democrats and political participation in new democracies: Lessons from Chile. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 668–687. 10.1177/1065912910370692
(2017). Media use and the social identity model of collective action: Examining the roles of online alternative news and social media news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(3), 663–681. 10.1177/1077699016638837
(2016). Political and civic engagement in youth. Hogrefe Publishing.
(2013). Entering politics: General self-efficacy and voting behavior among young people. Political Psychology, 34(2), 167–181. 10.1111/pops.12019
(2018). Psychometric evaluation of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) in Italy. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 51(3), 193–206. 10.1080/07481756.2017.1347021
(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
(2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27(1), 23–40.
(2017). Understanding young citizens’ political participation in Turkey: Does ‘being young’matter?. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17(1), 57–75. 10.1080/14683857.2016.1235000
(2015). A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behavior and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 907–917. 10.1002/ejsp.2154
(1997). State legislators' intentions to vote and subsequent votes on tobacco control legislation. Health Psychology, 16(4), 401–404. 10.1037/0278-6133.16.4.401
(2007). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 813–827. 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00577.x
(2007). Understanding voters’ decisions: A theory of planned behavior approach. Innovative Marketing, 3(4), 87–94.
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2018). Rapporto annuale [Annual report]. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/214230
(2019). Youth political participation in the EU: Evidence from a cross-national analysis. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(7), 819–836. 10.1080/13676261.2019.1636951
(2002). How group identification helps to overcome the dilemma of collective action. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 887–900.
(2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
(1996). Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1025–1036. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1025
(2016). Five dimensions of European identity: A contribution to the Italian adaptation and validation of the in-group identification scale. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 288–303. 10.5964/ejop.v12i2.1058
(2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American University students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68–84. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.68
(2019). Motivating political participation among youth: An analysis of factors related to adolescents’ political engagement. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1039–1055. 10.1111/pops.12578
(2017). What drives political participation? Motivations and mobilization in a digital age. Political Communication, 34(1), 21–43. 10.1080/10584609.2016.1225235
(2021). Examining individual differences in the internalization of political values: Validation of the self-determination scale of political motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 41–61. 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2300
(2020). They've put nothing in the pot!”: Brexit and the key psychological motivations behind voting ‘remain’ and ‘leave’. Political Psychology,41(1), 979–995. 10.1111/pops.12660
(2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
(2007). 206 Left–right orientations. In R. J. DaltonH. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 206–222). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0011
(2015). The motivating role of perceived right violation and efficacy beliefs in identification with the Italian water movement. Political Psychology, 36(3), 315–330. 10.1111/pops.12101
(2018). Moral judgment, political ideology and collective action. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(6), 610–620. 10.1111/sjop.12479
(2016). A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 54–60. 10.1080/10705511.2014.950896
(2005). Continuity of motivation in higher education: A three-year follow-up study. Annual Review of Psychology, 12(1), 31–43.
(2012). Modelli di equazioni strutturali per variabili osservate: Una nota sugli indici di adattamento [Structural Equation models with observed variables: A note on fit indices]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 39(1), 453–477.
(2019). L’impegno per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile come forma di cittadinanza attiva. Uno studio esplorativo sui giovani italiani [
(Being committed to Sustainable Development as a form of active citizenship. An exploratory study of young Italians ]. Psicologia di Comunità, 1(1), 32–48. 10.3280/PSC2019-0010042017). Verso una psicologia della partecipazione. Una sistematizzazione teorica dei rapporti tra le azioni nel sociale [
(Toward a Psychology of Participation: A theoretical analysis of the relationship between actions in the social context ]. Psicologia Sociale, 3(1), 253–276. 10.1482/878842000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
(2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
(2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(1), 1–11. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
(2019). What predicts environmental activism? The roles of identification with nature and politicized environmental identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61(1), 20–29. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.11.003
(2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
(2008). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation: Examining self-determination theory from flow theory perspective. In F. M. Olsson (Ed.), New developments in the psychology of motivation (pp. 1–24). Nova Science Publishers.
(2009). Pathways to collective protest: Calculation, identification, or emotion? a critical analysis of the role of group-based anger in social movement participation. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 681–705. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01620.x
(2014). Sense of community and community participation: A meta-analytic review. Social Indicators Research, 117(1), 1–28. 10.1007/s11205-013-0347-2
(2012). Attitudes of local people towards collective action for forest management: The case of participatory forest management in Dodola area in the Bale Mountains, Southern Ethiopia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(1), 245–265. 10.1007/s10531-011-0181-2
(2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. 10.1177/1368430211413619
(2009). The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 115–134. 10.1348/014466608x313774
(2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 194–218. 10.1177/1088868309341563
(2016). Group interaction as the crucible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 137–151. 10.1177/1368430215612217
(2018). L’attimo fuggente. Giovani e voto in Italia, tra continuità e cambiamento [Dead Poets Society]. Il Mulino.
(2015). Politicization during the 2012 U.S. Presidential Elections: Bridging the personal and the political through an identity content approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(3), 433–445. 10.1177/0146167215569494
(2017). The moral dimension of politicized identity: Exploring identity content during the 2012 Presidential Elections in the USA. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 416–436. 10.1111/bjso.12171
(2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 35–50. 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03
(1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). Academic Press. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
(2013). Politicized identity. In D. A. SnowD. Della PortaB. KlandermansD. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of social and political movements (pp. 974–977). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm163
(2010). Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1055–1060. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.006
(2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
(2018). The curious, context-dependent case of anger: Explaining voting intentions in three different national elections. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 329–338. 10.1111/jasp.12514
(2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618–634. 10.1177/1368430212467476
(2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
(2019). Ethnic minorities’ social media political use: How ingroup identification, selective exposure, and collective efficacy shape social media political expression. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(4), 147–164. 10.1093/jcmc/zmz007
(2012). Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. 10.1037/a0027127
(2006). Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of stock–recruitment relationships. Fisheries Research, 77(2), 220–225. 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.08.011
(2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
(2019). All click, no action? Online action, efficacy perceptions, and prior experience combine to affect future collective action. Computers in Human Behavior, 91(1), 97–105. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.007
(2017). Hope and anger as mediators between collective action frames and participation in collective mobilization: The Case of 15-M. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(1), 200–223. 10.5964/jspp.v5i1.471
(2019). Examining links from civic engagement to daily well-being from a self-determination theory perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(2), 166–177. 10.1080/17439760.2017.1388432
(2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. In S. Demoulin, J.-P. Leyens, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291–310). Psychology Press.
(2020). Political engagement’s non-political roots: Examining the role of basic psychological needs in the political domain. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 135–150. 10.1007/s11031-019-09801-w
(