Skip to main content
Original Article

Self-Determined Intention to Vote and the Mediating Role of Politicized Identification

A Study on Italian Young Adults During the 2018 Elections

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000524

Abstract. This study tested the Politicized Identification Model of Intention to Vote as an integrated model of political participation and self-determination theory to understand what motivates young people to vote and inform policy and communication efforts. The results of path analyses on survey data from a representative sample of 1,960 young Italians (age range, 20–35 years) revealed that participative efficacy positively and negatively predicted internalized motivation and amotivation, respectively. In addition, politicized identification mediated the positive relation between the internalized motivations and intention to vote. Finally, amotivation negatively predicted voting intention. Civic education campaigns should promote young people’s awareness that they can contribute to society by voting (i.e., participative efficacy) and support internalized motivations to vote.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 43–59. 10.1177/1368430215581430 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2018). Online discussion and the moral pathway to identity politicization and collective action. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 143–158. 10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1507 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, M. R. (2010). Community psychology, political efficacy, and trust. Political Psychology, 31(1), 59–84. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00734.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43(1), 155–165. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barkas, D., & Chryssochoou, X. (2017). Becoming politicized: Political socialization and participation of young people in the December 2008 revolt in Greece. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(4), 324–335. 10.1027/2151-2604/a000311 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Barrett, M. (2015). An integrative model of political and civic participation: Linking the macro, social and psychological levels of explanation. In M. BarrettB. Zani (Eds.), Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 162–187). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, J. C., Tausch, N., Spears, R., & Christ, O. (2011). Committed dis(s)idents: Participation in radical collective action fosters disidentification with the broader in-group but enhances political identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1104–1116. 10.1177/0146167211407076 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beckman, L. (2009). The frontiers of democracy: The right to vote and its limits. Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bonneau, C. W., & Cann, D. M. (2015). Party identification and vote choice in partisan and nonpartisan elections. Political Behavior, 37(1), 43–66. 10.1007/s11109-013-9260-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carlin, R. E. (2011). Distrusting democrats and political participation in new democracies: Lessons from Chile. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 668–687. 10.1177/1065912910370692 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chan, M. (2017). Media use and the social identity model of collective action: Examining the roles of online alternative news and social media news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(3), 663–681. 10.1177/1077699016638837 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chryssochoou, X., & Barrett, M. (2016). Political and civic engagement in youth. Hogrefe Publishing. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Condon, M., & Holleque, M. (2013). Entering politics: General self-efficacy and voting behavior among young people. Political Psychology, 34(2), 167–181. 10.1111/pops.12019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, S., Ingoglia, S., Inguglia, C., Liga, F., Lo Coco, A., & Larcan, R. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) in Italy. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 51(3), 193–206. 10.1080/07481756.2017.1347021 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27(1), 23–40. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erdoğan, E., & Uyan-Semerci, P. (2017). Understanding young citizens’ political participation in Turkey: Does ‘being young’matter?. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17(1), 57–75. 10.1080/14683857.2016.1235000 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fattori, F., Pozzi, M., Marzana, D., & Mannarini, T. (2015). A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behavior and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 907–917. 10.1002/ejsp.2154 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flynn, B. S., Dana, G. S., Goldstein, A. O., Bauman, K. E., Cohen, J. E., Gottlieb, N. H., Solomon, L. J., & Munger, M. C. (1997). State legislators' intentions to vote and subsequent votes on tobacco control legislation. Health Psychology, 16(4), 401–404. 10.1037/0278-6133.16.4.401 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fowler, J. H., & Kam, C. D. (2007). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 813–827. 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00577.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hansen, T., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Understanding voters’ decisions: A theory of planned behavior approach. Innovative Marketing, 3(4), 87–94. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Istat (2018). Rapporto annuale [Annual report]. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/214230 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kitanova, M. (2019). Youth political participation in the EU: Evidence from a cross-national analysis. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(7), 819–836. 10.1080/13676261.2019.1636951 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klandermans, B. (2002). How group identification helps to overcome the dilemma of collective action. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 887–900. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Vallerand, R. J., & Carducci, D. (1996). Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1025–1036. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1025 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • La Barbera, F., & Capone, V. (2016). Five dimensions of European identity: A contribution to the Italian adaptation and validation of the in-group identification scale. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 288–303. 10.5964/ejop.v12i2.1058 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American University students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68–84. 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.68 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levy, B. L. M., & Akiva, T. (2019). Motivating political participation among youth: An analysis of factors related to adolescents’ political engagement. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1039–1055. 10.1111/pops.12578 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lilleker, D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2017). What drives political participation? Motivations and mobilization in a digital age. Political Communication, 34(1), 21–43. 10.1080/10584609.2016.1225235 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Losier, G. F., Perreault, S., Koestner, R. & Vallerand, R. J (2021). Examining individual differences in the internalization of political values: Validation of the self-determination scale of political motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 41–61. 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2300 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Macdougall, A. I., Feddes, A. R., & Doosje, B. (2020). They've put nothing in the pot!”: Brexit and the key psychological motivations behind voting ‘remain’ and ‘leave’. Political Psychology,41(1), 979–995. 10.1111/pops.12660 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mair, P. (2007). 206 Left–right orientations. In R. J. DaltonH. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 206–222). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mazzoni, D., van Zomeren, M., & Cicognani, E. (2015). The motivating role of perceived right violation and efficacy beliefs in identification with the Italian water movement. Political Psychology, 36(3), 315–330. 10.1111/pops.12101 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moreira, P. L., Rique Neto, J., Sabucedo, J. M., & Camino, C. P. d. S. (2018). Moral judgment, political ideology and collective action. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(6), 610–620. 10.1111/sjop.12479 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moshagen, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2016). A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 54–60. 10.1080/10705511.2014.950896 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, F. H., & Palekčić, M. (2005). Continuity of motivation in higher education: A three-year follow-up study. Annual Review of Psychology, 12(1), 31–43. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pastore, M. (2012). Modelli di equazioni strutturali per variabili osservate: Una nota sugli indici di adattamento [Structural Equation models with observed variables: A note on fit indices]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 39(1), 453–477. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pistoni, C., Pozzi, M., Bonanomi, A., & Marta, E. (2019). L’impegno per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile come forma di cittadinanza attiva. Uno studio esplorativo sui giovani italiani [Being committed to Sustainable Development as a form of active citizenship. An exploratory study of young Italians]. Psicologia di Comunità, 1(1), 32–48. 10.3280/PSC2019-001004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pozzi, M., Pistoni, C., & Alfieri, S. (2017). Verso una psicologia della partecipazione. Una sistematizzazione teorica dei rapporti tra le azioni nel sociale [Toward a Psychology of Participation: A theoretical analysis of the relationship between actions in the social context]. Psicologia Sociale, 3(1), 253–276. 10.1482/87884 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(1), 1–11. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. T., Mackay, C. M. L., Droogendyk, L. M., & Payne, D. (2019). What predicts environmental activism? The roles of identification with nature and politicized environmental identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61(1), 20–29. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.11.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stavrou, N. A. (2008). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation: Examining self-determination theory from flow theory perspective. In F. M. Olsson (Ed.), New developments in the psychology of motivation (pp. 1–24). Nova Science Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2009). Pathways to collective protest: Calculation, identification, or emotion? a critical analysis of the role of group-based anger in social movement participation. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 681–705. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01620.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Talò, C., Mannarini, T., & Rochira, A. (2014). Sense of community and community participation: A meta-analytic review. Social Indicators Research, 117(1), 1–28. 10.1007/s11205-013-0347-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tesfaye, Y., Roos, A., & Bohlin, F. (2012). Attitudes of local people towards collective action for forest management: The case of participatory forest management in Dodola area in the Bale Mountains, Southern Ethiopia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(1), 245–265. 10.1007/s10531-011-0181-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. 10.1177/1368430211413619 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. A. (2009). The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 115–134. 10.1348/014466608x313774 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 194–218. 10.1177/1088868309341563 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. (2016). Group interaction as the crucible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 137–151. 10.1177/1368430215612217 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tuorto, D. (2018). L’attimo fuggente. Giovani e voto in Italia, tra continuità e cambiamento [Dead Poets Society]. Il Mulino. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., van Zomeren, M., & Postmes, T. (2015). Politicization during the 2012 U.S. Presidential Elections: Bridging the personal and the political through an identity content approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(3), 433–445. 10.1177/0146167215569494 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., van Zomeren, M., & Postmes, T. (2017). The moral dimension of politicized identity: Exploring identity content during the 2012 Presidential Elections in the USA. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 416–436. 10.1111/bjso.12171 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 35–50. 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). Academic Press. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Stekelenburg, J., Van Leeuwen, A., & Van Troost, D. (2013). Politicized identity. In D. A. SnowD. Della PortaB. KlandermansD. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of social and political movements (pp. 974–977). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm163 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2010). Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1055–1060. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., Mazzoni, D., & Cicognani, E. (2018). The curious, context-dependent case of anger: Explaining voting intentions in three different national elections. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 329–338. 10.1111/jasp.12514 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Schellhaas, F. M. H. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618–634. 10.1177/1368430212467476 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Velasquez, A., Montgomery, G., & Hall, J. A. (2019). Ethnic minorities’ social media political use: How ingroup identification, selective exposure, and collective efficacy shape social media political expression. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(4), 147–164. 10.1093/jcmc/zmz007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. 10.1037/a0027127 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2006). Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of stock–recruitment relationships. Fisheries Research, 77(2), 220–225. 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.08.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilkins, D. J., Livingstone, A. G., & Levine, M. (2019). All click, no action? Online action, efficacy perceptions, and prior experience combine to affect future collective action. Computers in Human Behavior, 91(1), 97–105. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wlodarczyk, A., Basabe, N., Páez, D., & Zumeta, L. (2017). Hope and anger as mediators between collective action frames and participation in collective mobilization: The Case of 15-M. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(1), 200–223. 10.5964/jspp.v5i1.471 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wray-Lake, L., DeHaan, C. R., Shubert, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Examining links from civic engagement to daily well-being from a self-determination theory perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(2), 166–177. 10.1080/17439760.2017.1388432 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, S. C., & Lubensky, M. E. (2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. In S. Demoulin, J.-P. Leyens, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291–310). Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wuttke, A. (2020). Political engagement’s non-political roots: Examining the role of basic psychological needs in the political domain. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 135–150. 10.1007/s11031-019-09801-w First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar