Abstract
Employee satisfaction with performance appraisal (PA) plays a large role in the perceived effectiveness of PA. We examined the joint effects of feedback sign (positive or negative) and three goal orientation dimensions (learning, performance-prove, performance-avoid) on PA satisfaction. Results revealed the negative relationship between negative feedback and PA satisfaction was stronger for those higher in performance-prove (PPGO), performance-avoid, and learning goal orientation. Additionally, the relationship between positive feedback and PA satisfaction was stronger for individuals low on PPGO and weaker for individuals high on PPGO. Implications for enhancing PA reactions are discussed.
References
(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(2001). 360o feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930–942.
(2011). Trait goal orientation, self-regulation, and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 467–483.
(2004). Satisfaction with performance appraisal: A study of role perceptions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 526–541.
(1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248–251.
(1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
(1978). The nature of subordinate participation in the appraisal interview. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 646–658.
(1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349–371.
(2006). An investigation of potential consequences of satisfaction with appraisal feedback. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13, 14–28.
(2002). Sex differences in responses to evaluative feedback: A field study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 242–251.
(2002). Responses to formal performance appraisal feedback: The role of negative affectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 192–201.
(2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30, 881–905.
(1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128–150.
(1986). Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 211–218.
(2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management, 51, 709–732.
(1993). Differences in task performance as a function of type of feedback: Learning-oriented versus performance-oriented feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 303–320.
(1997). Effects of self-efficacy and goal orientation on negotiation skill maintenance: What are the mechanisms?. Personnel Psychology, 50, 955–978.
(1988). Moderator variables in research: A review and analysis of conceptual and methodological issues. In , Research in personnel and human resources management, vol. 6, (pp. 191–229). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
(1994). Relative power of moderated multiple regression and the comparison of subgroup correlation coefficients for detecting moderating effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 354–359.
(1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995–1015.
(2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 581–604.
