Skip to main content
Original Article

The Bidirectional Relationship Between Person-Job Fit and Work Engagement

A Three-Wave Study

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000143

Abstract. Although theorized and generally accepted, research on the relationship (specifically the direction of the causal relationship) between person-job fit and work engagement is limited and not yet clear. Theoretical arguments can be presented for both directions, but empirical evidence is scarce. The study reported here explored the bidirectional relationship between person-job fit and work engagement in a longitudinal design. A three-wave cross-lagged panel design was used in a sample of 382 participants from the financial, healthcare, and manufacturing industries in South Africa. The results of Bayesian informative hypothesis testing showed the most support for the hypothesis stating that work engagement is a stronger predictor of person-job fit over time. Conversely, the hypothesis that person-job fit is the predictor of work engagement over time received limited support.

References

  • Bakker, A. B. (2010). Engagement and job crafting: Engaged employees create their own great place to work. In S. AlbrechtEd., Handbook of engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 229–244). Northampton, MA: Edwin Elgar. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 265–269. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and Work Engagement: The JD–R Approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389–411. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. & Xanthopoulou, D. (2011). How do engaged employees stay engaged? Ciencia & Trabajo, 13, 135–142. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B. & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P. & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22, 187–200. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Banerjee, A., Chitnis, U. B., Jadhav, S. L., Bhawalkar, J. S. & Chaudhury, S. (2009). Hypothesis testing, type I and type II errors. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18, 127–131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brand-Labuschagne, L., Mostert, K., Rothmann Jr., S. R. & Rothmann, J. C. (2013). Burnout and work engagement of South African blue-collar workers: The development of a new scale. Southern African Business Review, 16, 58–93. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cable, D. M. & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–883. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carless, S. A. (2005). Person-job fit versus person-organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 411–429. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cunningham, J. B. & Eberle, T. (1990). A guide to job enrichment and redesign. Personnel, 67, 56–61. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Beer, L., Rothmann Jr., S. & Pienaar, J. (2012). A confirmatory investigation of a job demands-resources model using a categorical estimator. Psychological Reports, 111, 528–544. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Beer, L. T., Pienaar, J. & Rothmann Jr., S. (2014). Job burnout, work engagement and self‐reported treatment for health conditions in South Africa. Stress and Health, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/smi.2576 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Bruin, D. P., Hill, C., Henn, C. M. & Muller, K. P. (2013). Dimensionality of the UWES-17: An item response modelling analysis. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39, 8. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Bruin, G. P. & Henn, C. M. (2013). Dimensionality of the 9-item Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES–9). Psychological Reports, 112, 788–799. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 165–183. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Demerouti, E., Mostert, K. & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Burnout and work engagement: A thorough investigation of the independency of both constructs. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 209–222. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L. CooperI. T. RobertsonEds., International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 283–357). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erdogan, B. & Bauer, T. N. (2005). Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of fit with jobs and organisations. Personnel Psychology, 58, 859–891. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. The American Psychologist, 56, 218. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fredrickson, B. L. & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 313–332. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabriel, A. S., Diefendorff, J. M., Chandler, M. M., Moran, C. M. & Greguras, G. J. (2013). The dynamic relationships of work affect and job satisfaction with perceptions of fit. Personnel Psychology, 67, 389–420. doi: 10.1111/peps.12042 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • González-Romá, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Lloret, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 165–174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greguras, G. J. & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 465–477. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hackman, J. R. (1980). Work redesign and motivation. Professional Psychology, 11, 445–455. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495–513. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamid, S. N. A. & Yahya, K. K. (2011). Relationship between person-job fit and person-organization fit on employees’ work engagement: A study among engineers in semiconductor companies in Malaysia. In Annual Conference on Innovations in Business & Management London, UK (pp. 1–30). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hirschi, A. (2012). Callings and work engagement: Moderated mediation model of work meaningfulness, occupational identity, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 479–485. doi: 10.1037/a0028949 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoijtink, H. (2012). Informative hypotheses: Theory and practice for behavioral and social scientists. London, UK: Chapman and Hall/CRC. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jha, S. & Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2012). Study of perceived recruitment practices and their relationships to job satisfaction. Synergy, 10, 63–76. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • June, S. & Mahmood, R. (2011). The relationship between person-job fit and job performance: A study among the employees of the service sector SMEs in Malaysia. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1, 95–105. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D. & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Langelaan, S., Bakker, A. B., Van Doornen, L. J. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 521–532. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laschinger, H. K. S. & Finegan, J. (2005). Empowering nurses for work engagement and health in hospital settings. Journal of Nursing Administration, 35, 439–449. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leiter, M. P. & Maslach, C. (1999). Six areas of worklife: a model of the organizational context of burnout. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 21, 472–489. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A. & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 825–841. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lu, C. Q., Wang, H. J., Lu, J. J., Du, D. Y. & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Does work engagement increase person-job fit? The role of job crafting and job insecurity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84, 142–152. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muchinsky, P. M. & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 268–277. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2013). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487–516. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, S. K. & Griffin, M. A. (2011). Understanding active psychological states: Embedding engagement in a wider nomological net and closer attention to performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 60–67. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ployhart, R. E. & Ward, A. K. (2011). The “quick start guide” for conducting and publishing longitudinal research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 413–422. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É. & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rogosa, D. (1980). A critique of cross-lagged correlation. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 245–258. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothmann, S. & Rothmann, J. C. (2007). The South African Employee Health and Wellness Survey (SAEHWS). User manual (4th ed.). Potchefstroom, South Africa: Afriforte. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Saks, A. M. & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395–426. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 293–315. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B. & Taris, T. W. (2005). The conceptualization and measurement of burnout: Common ground and worlds apart. Work and Stress, 19, 256–262. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scroggins, W. A. (2008). The relationship between employee fit perceptions, job performance, and retention: Implications of perceived fit. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 20, 57–71. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E. J., Binnewies, C. & Scholl, A. (2008). Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect. Work & Stress, 22, 257–276. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taris, T. (2000). Longitudinal data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., Derks, D. & Van Rhenen, W. (2013). Job crafting at the team and individual level: Implications for work engagement and performance. Group & Organization Management, 38, 427–454. doi: 10.1177/1059601113492421 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van de Schoot, R., Hoijtink, H. & Deković, M. (2010). Testing inequality constrained hypotheses in SEM models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 443–463. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van de Schoot, R., Hoijtink, H., Hallquist, M. N. & Boelen, P. A. (2012). Bayesian evaluation of inequality-constrained hypotheses in SEM models using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 1–17. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van de Schoot, R., Hoijtink, H. & Jan-Willem, R. (2011). Moving beyond traditional null hypothesis testing: Evaluating expectations directly. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van de Schoot, R., Verhoeven, M. & Hoijtink, H. (2013). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in SEM using Mplus: A black bear story. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 81–98. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warr, P. & Inceoglu, I. (2012). Job engagement, job satisfaction, and contrasting associations with person-job fit. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 129–138. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wrzesniewski, A. & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179–201. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, K. Y. T. (2009). Affective influences in person-environment fit theory: Exploring the role of affect as both cause and outcome of P-E fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1210–1226. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zyphur, M. J. & Oswald, F. L. (2013). Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. Journal of Management, 41, 390–420. doi: 10.1177/0149206313501200 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar