Skip to main content
Editorial

Timely and to the Point

Expectations for Articles and Reviews at the Journal of Personnel Psychology

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000259
Free first page

References

  • Bliese, P. D., & Wang, M. (2019). Results provide information about cumulative probabilities of finding significance: Let’s report this information. Journal of Management, 014920631988690. 10.1177/0149206319886909 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eby, L. T., Shockley, K. M., Bauer, T. N., Edwards, B., Homan, A. C., Johnson, R., … Oswald, F. L. (2020). Methodological checklists for improving research quality and reporting consistency. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(1), 76–83. 10.1017/iop.2020.14 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gelman, A. (2019). Don’t calculate post-hoc power using observed estimate of effect size. Annals of Surgery, 269(1), e9–e10. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002908 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoenig, J. M., & Heisey, D. M. (2001). The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. American Statistician, 55, 19–24. 10.1198/000313001300339897 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. 10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.102 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yuan, K.-H., & Maxwell, S. (2005). On the post hoc power in testing mean differences. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(2), 141–167. 10.3102/10769986030002141 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar