Abstract
Abstract. The majority of educational research on the associations between growth constructs and academic outcomes has adopted a somewhat piecemeal approach, focusing on either growth mindset (implicit beliefs about intelligence) or growth goals. We explore an integrative approach to analyzing the impact of well-established and emerging growth constructs (viz. growth mindset, self-based growth goals, task-based growth goals) on academic outcomes in mathematics. Our participants were secondary school students (n = 4,411) in grades 7–9 from 19 schools in Australia. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the measurement and substantive hypotheses in our study. We found that growth mindset, self-based growth goals, and task-based growth goals were well represented by an underlying growth orientation factor. Additionally, after controlling for five student background factors (e.g., sex, socioeconomic status [SES]), students’ growth orientation positively predicted mathematics engagement and achievement. These results contribute to the growing literature on educational growth constructs and academic success.
References
2011). Census QuickStats. Retrieved from http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/0
. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
(2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York, NY: Routledge.
(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
(2002). Evaluation goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902
(2008). Changes in high-school students’ competence beliefs, utility value and achievement goals in mathematics. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 31–50. doi: 10.1348/000709907X197993
(2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.002
(2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046
(2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2006). Mindset. New York, NY: Random House.
(1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
(2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi: 10.1037/10022-3514.80.3.501
(2015). Potential-based achievement goals. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 192–206. doi: 10.1111/bjep. 12051
(2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632–648. doi: 10.1037/a0023952
(2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
(2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
(1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
(2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 48–73. doi: 10.1037/a0026223
(2014). Girls’ and boys’ perceived mathematics teacher beliefs, classroom learning environments and mathematical career intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.005
(2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
(2006). Personal bests (PBs): A proposed multidimensional model and empirical analysis. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 803–825. doi: 10.1348/000709905X55389
(2015a). Growth approaches to academic development: Research into academic trajectories and growth assessment, goals, and mindsets. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 133–137. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12071
(2015b). Implicit theories about intelligence and growth (personal best) goals: Exploring reciprocal relationships. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 207–223. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12038
(2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1–18. doi: 10.1037/a0025988
(2016a). The role of personal best (PB) and dichotomous achievement goals in students’ academic motivation and engagement: A longitudinal investigation. Educational Psychology, 36, 1285–1302. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2015.1093606
(2016b). The role of personal best (PB) goal setting in students’ academic achievement gains. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 222–227. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.014
(2001). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 87–102.
(2013). Adaptability: How students’ responses to uncertainty and novelty predict their academic and non-academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 728–746. doi: 10.1037/a0032794
(2015). Exploring the ups and downs of mathematics engagement in the middle years of school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 199–244. doi: 10.1177/0272431614529365
(1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 247–255.
(2016). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(2013). Education at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. Paris, France: OECD. doi: 10.1787/eag-2013-en
. (2016). Introducing the concept of optimal best: Theoretical and methodological contributions. Education, 136, 312–322.
(2010). Evaluation of scale reliability with binary measures using latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 265–279. doi: 10.1080/10705511003659417
(2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
(2016).
(Achivement goal theory . In K. R. WentzelD. B. MieleEds., Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 75–95). New York, NY: Routledge.2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422
(2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50, 1–13. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
(2016). The role of implicit theories of intelligence and ability in predicting achievement for Indigenous (Aboriginal) Australian students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 47, 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.01.002
(2014). Personal best (PB) and “classic” achievement goals in the Chinese context: Their role in predicting academic motivation, engagement and buoyancy. Educational Psychology, 34, 635–658. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2014.895297
(