Skip to main content
Original Article

Students’ Growth Mindsets, Goals, and Academic Outcomes in Mathematics

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000287

Abstract. The majority of educational research on the associations between growth constructs and academic outcomes has adopted a somewhat piecemeal approach, focusing on either growth mindset (implicit beliefs about intelligence) or growth goals. We explore an integrative approach to analyzing the impact of well-established and emerging growth constructs (viz. growth mindset, self-based growth goals, task-based growth goals) on academic outcomes in mathematics. Our participants were secondary school students (n = 4,411) in grades 7–9 from 19 schools in Australia. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the measurement and substantive hypotheses in our study. We found that growth mindset, self-based growth goals, and task-based growth goals were well represented by an underlying growth orientation factor. Additionally, after controlling for five student background factors (e.g., sex, socioeconomic status [SES]), students’ growth orientation positively predicted mathematics engagement and achievement. These results contribute to the growing literature on educational growth constructs and academic success.

References

  • ABS. (2011). Census QuickStats. Retrieved from http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/0 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H. & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bryne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluation goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chouinard, R. & Roy, N. (2008). Changes in high-school students’ competence beliefs, utility value and achievement goals in mathematics. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 31–50. doi: 10.1348/000709907X197993 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Papworth, B. & Ginns, P. (2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T. & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset. New York, NY: Random House. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi: 10.1037/10022-3514.80.3.501 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., Kobeisy, A. & Lichtenfeld, S. (2015). Potential-based achievement goals. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 192–206. doi: 10.1111/bjep. 12051 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K. & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632–648. doi: 10.1037/a0023952 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M.-S. & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 48–73. doi: 10.1037/a0026223 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lazarides, R. & Watt, H. M. G. (2014). Girls’ and boys’ perceived mathematics teacher beliefs, classroom learning environments and mathematical career intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G. & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J. (2006). Personal bests (PBs): A proposed multidimensional model and empirical analysis. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 803–825. doi: 10.1348/000709905X55389 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J. (2015a). Growth approaches to academic development: Research into academic trajectories and growth assessment, goals, and mindsets. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 133–137. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12071 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J. (2015b). Implicit theories about intelligence and growth (personal best) goals: Exploring reciprocal relationships. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 207–223. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12038 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J. & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1–18. doi: 10.1037/a0025988 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J. & Elliot, A. J. (2016a). The role of personal best (PB) and dichotomous achievement goals in students’ academic motivation and engagement: A longitudinal investigation. Educational Psychology, 36, 1285–1302. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2015.1093606 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J. & Elliot, A. J. (2016b). The role of personal best (PB) goal setting in students’ academic achievement gains. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 222–227. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W. & Debus, R. L. (2001). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 87–102. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J., Nejad, H. G., Colmar, S. & Liem, G. A. D. (2013). Adaptability: How students’ responses to uncertainty and novelty predict their academic and non-academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 728–746. doi: 10.1037/a0032794 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J., Way, J., Bobis, J. & Anderson, J. (2015). Exploring the ups and downs of mathematics engagement in the middle years of school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 199–244. doi: 10.1177/0272431614529365 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, R. P. & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 247–255. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2016). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • OECD. (2013). Education at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. Paris, France: OECD. doi: 10.1787/eag-2013-en First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phan, H. P., Ngu, B. H. & Williams, A. (2016). Introducing the concept of optimal best: Theoretical and methodological contributions. Education, 136, 312–322. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raykov, T., Dimitrov, D. M. & Asparouhov, T. (2010). Evaluation of scale reliability with binary measures using latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 265–279. doi: 10.1080/10705511003659417 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Senko, C. (2016). Achivement goal theory. In K. R. WentzelD. B. MieleEds., Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 75–95). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shrout, P. E. & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C. & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50, 1–13. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tarbetsky, A. L., Collie, R. J. & Martin, A. J. (2016). The role of implicit theories of intelligence and ability in predicting achievement for Indigenous (Aboriginal) Australian students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 47, 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.01.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, K. & Martin, A. J. (2014). Personal best (PB) and “classic” achievement goals in the Chinese context: Their role in predicting academic motivation, engagement and buoyancy. Educational Psychology, 34, 635–658. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2014.895297 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar