Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Research Spotlight

Conservative Ideological Shift Among Adolescents in Response to System Threat

Published Online:December 14, 2017https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000299

Abstract

Abstract. We examined conservative ideological shift among adolescents by assessing the effect of different types of threat on the self-reported political orientation of 183 New York City high school students and investigated the mediating role of system justification. Participants read one of three newspaper passages: (1) a system-related passage that described flaws in the American social, economic, and political system; (2) a self-related passage that described the deleterious health effects of cell phone use; or (3) a control passage that described house plant cultivation. Participants then completed measures of system justification and political orientation. As hypothesized, a threat to the system (but not the self) increased self-reported conservatism indirectly through its effect on system justification. This suggests that when the overarching social system is threatened, adolescents may be drawn to conservative ideology and that this is attributable, at least in part, to a heightened desire to defend and bolster the societal status quo.

References

  • Baron, A. & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Evidence of system justification in young children. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00214.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bonanno, G. A. & Jost, J. T. (2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2804_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burke, B. L., Kosloff, S. & Landau, M. J. (2013). Death goes to the polls: A meta-analysis of mortality salience effects on political attitudes. Political Psychology, 34, 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Echebarria-Echabe, A. & Fernandez-Guede, E. (2006). Effects of terrorism on attitudes and ideological orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.294 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Henry, P. J. & Saul, A. (2006). The development of system justification in the developing world. Social Justice Research, 19, 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0012-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38, 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R. & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D. & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A. & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Stern, C., Rule, N. O. & Sterling, J. (2017). The politics of fear: Is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? Social Cognition, 35, 324–353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.324 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. & Van der Toorn, J. (2012). System justification theory. In P. A. M. van LangeA. W. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 313–343). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kay, A. C. & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T. & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00810.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lambert, A. J., Scherer, L. D., Schott, J. P., Olsen, K. R., Andrews, R., O’Brien, T. & Zisser, A. R. (2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: An integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 886–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019086 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., … Cook, A. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204267988 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liviatan, I. & Jost, J. T. (2014). A social-cognitive analysis of system justification goal striving. Social Cognition, 32, 95–129. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.2.95 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Markus, G. B. (1986). Stability and change in political attitudes: Observed, recalled, and “explained”. Political Behavior, 8, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987591 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGregor, I., Nail, P. R., Marigold, D. C. & Kang, S.-J. (2005). Defensive pride and consensus: Strength in imaginary numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 978–996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.978 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nail, P. R. & McGregor, I. (2009). Conservative shift among liberals and conservatives following 9/11/01. Social Justice Research, 22, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0098-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A., Steele, G. & Thompson, A. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 901–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J. & Solomon, S. (1997). Why do we need what we need? A terror management perspective on the roots of human social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0801_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schüller, S. (2015). The 9/11 conservative shift. Economics Letters, 135, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.07.031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thórisdóttir, H. & Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated closed‐mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32, 785–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00840.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van der Toorn, J., Feinberg, M., Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R. & Wilmuth, C. (2015). A sense of powerlessness fosters system justification: Implications for the legitimation of authority, hierarchy, and government. Political Psychology, 36, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12183 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar