Abstract
Abstract. This paper reviews the research that has been conducted into youth civic and political engagement since 2010. We begin by noting the claim that youth are not sufficiently engaged either civically or politically. We argue that this claim is probably incorrect: rather than using conventional forms of political participation, youth today are often engaged through nonconventional and civic means instead. We also indicate at the outset some important cautions about the interpretation of research findings in this field, in particular the need to consider the kinds of political issues with which youth are involved, the moments in time at which they are involved, and the societal contexts in which their involvement occurs. We argue that these specificities mean that it might be difficult or even impossible to construct a unified model or comprehensive understanding of youth civic and political engagement. The review then considers recent research findings on the role of micro-, meso-, and macro-level factors in influencing youth engagement. Micro-level factors include political interest, efficacy, ideologies, values, and identity; meso-level factors include the family, school, peers, and the neighborhood; while macro-level factors include political-cultural, economic, legal, and institutional factors. We also review recent findings on the role of young people’s demographic positioning, the effects that social media might be playing in transforming youth engagement, and how political parties can actively mobilize youth. We conclude that young people are far from being apathetic and uninterested in politics, but that they need to find ways to be involved that are meaningful to them. We also indicate some possible future lines of research that could be profitably pursued.
References
2010). Participation in civil society and political life among young people in Maharashtra: Findings from the youth in India – situation and needs study. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.05.012
(2015).
(Predictors of civic and political participation among native and migrant youth in Italy: The role of organizational membership, sense of community and perceived social well-being . In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 268–291). London, UK: Routledge.2015). Ecological contexts and youth civic and political engagement in Paris, France. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 39, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.04.010
(2012). How is civic engagement developed over time? Emerging answers from a multidisciplinary field. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.011
(2012). Political knowledge, attitudes and values among Palestinian and Jewish youth in Israel: The role of nationality, gender and religiosity. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 704–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.017
(2015). Motivations for civic participation among diverse youth: More similarities than differences. Research in Human Development, 12, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2015.1010348
(2015).
(An integrative model of political and civic participation: Linking the macro, social and psychological levels of explanation . In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 162–187). London, UK: Routledge.2014). Political and civic engagement and participation: Towards an integrative perspective. Journal of Civil Society, 10, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2013.871911
(Youth civic and political engagement. London, UK: Routledge.
(in press).Barrett, M.Zani, B. (Eds.). (2015). Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
2010).
(Changing citizen identity and the rise of a participatory media culture . In L. R. SherrodJ. Torney-PurtaC. A. FlanaganEds., Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 393–423). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
(2016). “Staying out of trouble” and doing what is “right”: Citizenship acts, citizenship ideals, and the effects of legal status on second-generation youth. American Behavioral Scientist, 60, 1534–1552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216664941
(2015). “If it helps, I’ll carry on”: Factors supporting the participation of native and immigrant youth in Belgium and Germany. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 149, 711–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2014.972307
(2016, October 21). When young people get involved in online communities it leads them towards politics. Monkey Cage, Washington Post. Accessed August 24, 2017, from https://ypp.dmlcentral.net/publications/311
(2015).
(Political and civic participation: Findings from the modelling of existing survey data sets . In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 195–212). London, UK: Routledge.2014). The myth of youth apathy: Young Europeans’ critical attitudes toward democratic life. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213515992
(2011). Taking stock of youth organizing: An interdisciplinary perspective. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 134, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.309
(2017). Right to public space and right to democracy: The role of social media in Gezi Park. Research and Policy on Turkey, 2, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/23760818.2016.1272267
(2011).
(Perceptions of (in)compatibility between identities and participation of ethnic minorities to the national polity . In A. AzziX. ChryssochoouB. KlandermansB. SimonEds., Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 69–88). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.10.002
(2012). Participatory politics: New media and youth political action. Oakland, CA: Mills College School of Education. Accessed August 24, 2017, from https://ypp.dmlcentral.net/sites/default/files/publications/Participatory_Politics_Report.pdf
(2014). Identity styles, positive youth development, and civic engagement in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1818–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0100-4
(2012). Fostering marginalized youths’ political participation: Longitudinal roles of parental political socialization and youth sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9495-9
(2011). Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Development, 82, 1815–1833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01650.x
(2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22, 283–300. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
(2011).
(What does it take to be a political actor in a multicultural society? . In M. BarrettC. FloodJ. EadeEds., Nationalism, ethnicity, citizenship: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 135–162). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.2016). Inspiring! Youth organisations contribution to citizenship education. Brussels, Belgium: European Youth Forum. Accessed August 17, 2017, from http://www.youthforum.org/assets/2016/10/Youth-organisations-contribution-to-citizenship-education.pdf
. (2011). Civic engagement patterns and transitions over 8 years: The AmeriCorps national study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1728–1743. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025360
(2011). Youth civic development: Historical context and emerging issues. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 134, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.307
(2010). Youth and political participation – empirical results for Germany within a European context. Young, 18, 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881001800404
(2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London, UK: Pluto Press.
(2011). Are religious minorities in Greece better accepted if they assimilate? The effects of acculturation strategy and group membership on religious minority perceptions. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1119
(2016). Culture, racial socialization, and positive African American youth development. Journal of Black Psychology, 42, 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798415578004
(2010). Beyond apathetic or activist youth: “Ordinary” young people and contemporary forms of participation. Young, 18, 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330880901800103
(2012). The Arab spring revisited. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 5, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550912.2012.673384
(2014). News for everyone? Perspectives of young people and journalists on political reporting in UK television. Young, 22, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308814521623
(Herrera, L.Sakr, R. (Eds.). (2014). Wired citizenship: Youth learning and activism in the Middle East. New York, NY: Routledge.
2017, June 9). Shock general election result shows the importance of authenticity and youth targeting. Marketing Week. Accessed August 28, 2017, from https://www.marketingweek.com/2017/06/09/general-election-aftermath-labour-conservatives-corbyn/
(2016). Preparing to participate: The role of youth social responsibility and political efficacy on civic engagement for Black early adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 9, 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9331-5
(2015). Civic competence of youth in Europe: Measuring cross national variation through the creation of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 123, 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0746-z
(2012). A cross-cultural examination of adolescent civic engagement: Comparing Italian and American community-oriented and political involvement. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 40, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2012.633065
(2014). Muslim young people online: “Acts of citizenship” in socially networked spaces. Social Inclusion, 2, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i2.168
(2012). Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39, 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x
(2014). Policy effects on informed political engagement. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 665–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213515219
(1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
(2014). Identity politics and politicized identities: Identity processes and the dynamics of protest. Political Psychology, 35, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12167
(2015).
(Collective action . In J. D. WrightEd., Elsevier encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 145–150). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24001-42012). Family affluence, school and neighborhood contexts and adolescents’ civic engagement: A cross-national study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9489-7
(2011). Change: How young voters interpreted the messages sent during the 2008 presidential election season. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211398075
(2012). The mediational role of values in linking personality traits to civic engagement in Italian youth. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 40, 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2012.633064
(2016, September 9). How social media helps young people – especially minorities and the poor–get politically engaged. Monkey Cage, Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/09/09/how-social-media-helps-young-people-especially-minorities-and-the-poor-get-politically-engaged/?utm_term=.24f55ee31b9a
(2015). Civic purpose: An integrated construct for understanding civic development in adolescence. Human Development, 58, 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381655
(2014). Crossing boundaries: Acts of citizenship among migrant youth in Melbourne. Social Inclusion, 2, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v2i2.164
(2012). Civic commitment in young activists: Emergent processes in the development of personal and collective identity. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.11.006
(2012). Young Chileans’ views of citizenship: Findings from the first generation born after the reinstitution of democracy. Applied Developmental Science, 16, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2012.722889
(2015). Political orientation and occupational values of college youth over the last 45 years. Psychology and Education, 52, 1–12.
(2014). Youth future civic participation in Europe: Differences between the East and the rest. Social Indicators Research, 115, 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0258-2
(2012).
(Positive immigrant youth adaptation in context: Developmental, acculturation, and social psychological perspectives . In A. S. MastenK. LiebkindD. J. HernandezEds., Realizing the potential of immigrant youth (pp. 117–158). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.2014). Beyond skills and structure: Justice dispositions as antecedents of young citizens’ volunteering and political participation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2166
(2016). An apathetic generation? Cohorts’ patterns of political participation in Italy. Social Indicators Research, 125, 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0869-x
(2012). Family functioning’s contributions to values and group participation in Italian late adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 40, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2012.633066
(2015). The political socialization of youth in a post-conflict community. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 45, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.12.005
(2016). When political talk translates into political action: The role of personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.009
(2017). Stability and change in youths’ political interest. Social Indicators Research, 132, 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1302-9
(2010). ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IEA.
(2017). Developing sociopolitical consciousness of race and social class inequality in adolescents attending progressive and no excuses urban secondary schools. Applied Developmental Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1254557
(2011). “Unapologetic and unafraid”: Immigrant youth come out from the shadows. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 134, 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.311
(2011). Political participation of teenagers in the information era. Journal of Psycho-Educational Assessment, 29, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310363255
(1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
(Sherrod, L. R.Torney-Purta, J.Flanagan, C. A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2011).
(Collective identity and political engagement . In A. AzziX. ChryssochoouB. KlandermansB. SimonEds., Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies (pp. 137–157). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328158.ch72001). Politicized collective identity. A social psychological analysis. The American Psychologist, 56, 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
(2013). When dual identity becomes a liability: Identity and political radicalism among migrants. Psychological Science, 24, 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612450889
(2016). Diversity and voice: The political participation of young people in the European Union. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18, 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116647176
(2017). On the role of a social identity analysis in articulating structure and collective action: The 2011 riots in Tottenham and Hackney. The British Journal of Criminology, 57, 964–981. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw036
(2015). “I wouldn’t have what it takes”: Young Swedes’ understandings of political participation. Young, 24, 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308815603305
(1974). Social Identity and Intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
(1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
(2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728
(2017, June 16). General election 2017: What caused Labour’s youth vote surge? BBC News Online. Accessed August 28, 2017, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40244905
(1981). Intergroup behaviour. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
(2015). Collective identity factors and the attitude toward violence in defense of ethnicity or religion among Muslim youth of Turkish and Moroccan Descent. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 47, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.026
(2013). The political psychology of protest. Sacrificing for a cause. European Psychologist, 18, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000156
(2010).
(Individuals in movements: A social psychology of contention . In C. M. RoggebandB. KlandermansEds., The handbook of social movements across disciplines (Reprint ed., pp. 157–204). New York, NY: Springer.2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology Review, 61, 886–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113479314
(2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430835
(2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
(2015). Is conventional political participation an indicator of youth civic engagement?
([¿Es la participaciónpolíticaconvencional un indicadordel compromise cívico de los jóvenes?] . Universitas Psychologica, 14, 715–730. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-2.eppc2017). Investigating civic participation developmental trajectories among Canadian youths transitioning into adulthood. Applied Developmental Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1301816
(2010). Everyday youth participation? Contrasting views from Australian policymakers and young people. Young, 18, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330880901800107
(2014). Youth political consumerism and the 2012 presidential election: What influences youth boycotting and buycotting? American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213515993
(2014). Correlates of political and civic engagement among youth during the 2012 presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 622–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213515226
(2017). Are they political? Examining Asian American college students’ civic engagement. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 8, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000061
(