Skip to main content
Original Article

Gamified Personality Assessment

Virtual Behavior Cues of Honesty-Humility

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000379

Abstract. Unobtrusive behavioral cues of personality traits can be found in physical and virtual environments (e.g., office environments and social media profiles), but detecting and coding such cues are a painstaking effort, and therefore impractical for research purposes. Measuring people’s choices in a virtual, gamified environment may offer a suitable substitute. It is currently unknown whether Honesty-Humility can also be assessed in a virtual environment. In two studies, we demonstrate that Honesty-Humility can be inferred with at least modest validity from virtual behavior cues. In a third study, we tested the fakeability of the virtual cues. This study found that even under faking instructions the virtual cues were related to Honesty-Humility, however, the virtual cues were just as fakeable as self-reported Honesty-Humility. Our results imply that virtual cues can be incorporated in serious games to measure personality. Future research may investigate whether the identified virtual cues are able to predict important Honesty-Humility related outcomes.

References

  • Anglim, J., Morse, G., De Vries, R. E., MacCann, C., & Marty, A. (2017). Comparing job applicants to non-applicants using an item-level bifactor model on the HEXACO personality inventory. European Journal of Personality, 31, 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2120 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & De Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bélise, J.-F., & Bodur, H. O. (2010). Avatars as information: Perception of consumers based on their avatars in virtual worlds. Psychology, & Marketing, 27, 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20354 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Branninck, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00354.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2016). New talent signals: Shiny new objects or a brave new world? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2016.6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). New York, NY: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Vries, R. E., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). De zes belangrijkste persoonlijkheidsdimensies en de HEXACO persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst [The six most important personality dimensions and the HEXACO Personality Inventory]. Gedrag, & Organisatie, 22, 232–274. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Vries, R. E., Tybur, J. M., Pollet, T. V., & Van Vugt, M. (2016). Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality. Evolution, & Human Behavior, 37, 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Electronic Arts. (2009). The Sims 3. [PC Game]. Retrieved from http://www.thesims.com/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Electronic Arts. (2014a). SimCity. [PC Game]. Retrieved from https://www.ea.com/nl-nl/games/simcity/simcity First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Electronic Arts. (2014b). The Sims 4. [PC Game]. Retrieved from http://www.thesims.com First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fekken, G. C., Holden, R. R., Jackson, D. N., & Guthrie, G. M. (1987). An evaluation of the personality research form with Filipino university students. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598708246781 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fong, K., & Mar, R. A. (2015). What does my avatar say about me? Inferring personality from avatars. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214562761 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Craik, K. H., Martin, N. R., & Pryor, M. R. (2005). The personal living space cue inventory: An analysis and evaluation. Environment and Behavior, 37, 683–705. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.379 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, L. T., Sandy, C. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Manifestations of individual differences in physical and virtual environments. In T. Chamorro-PremuzicS. von StummA. FurnhamEds., The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 773–800). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343120.ch30 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five-factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25, 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116659134 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mailhos, A., Buunk, A. P., & Cabana, Á. (2016). Signature size signals social dominance and narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.09.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, L. A. (2003). Warning against faking on personality tests: Effects on applicant reactions and personality test scores. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2003.00250.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naumann, L. P., Vazire, S., Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661–1671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346309 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nezlek, J. B., Mochort, E., & Cypryańka, M. (2019). Self-presentational motives and public self-consciousness: Why do people dress a certain way? Journal of Personality, 87, 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12423 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Neill, T. A., Lee, N. M., Radan, J., Law, S. J., Lewis, R. J., & Carswell, J. J. (2013). The impact of “non-targeted traits” on personality test faking, hiring, and workplace deviance. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.027 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quercia, D., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2011). Our Twitter profiles, our selves: Predicting personality with Twitter. IEEE conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom). New York, NY: IEEE, 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.26 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rockstar Games. (2013). Grand Theft Auto V [PC Game]. Retrieved from http://www.rockstargames.com/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shoss, M. K., & Strube, M. J. (2011). How do you fake a personality test? An investigation of cognitive models of impression-managed responding. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shute, V. J., Masduki, I., & Donmez, O. (2010). Conceptual framework for modeling, assessing and supporting competencies within game environments. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 8, 137–161. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Todorov, A., Dotsch, R., Porter, J., Oosterhof, N., & Falvello, V. (2013). Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13, 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032335 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Todorov, A., & Oosterhof, N. (2011). Modeling social perception of faces. IEEE Signaling Processing Magazine, 28, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.940006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vazire, S., Naumann, L. P., Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Portrait of a narcissist: Manifestations of narcissism in physical appearance. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1439–1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, D. (2010). The mapping principle, and a research framework for virtual worlds. Communication Theory, 20, 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01371.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wohn, D. Y., & Wash, R. (2013). A virtual “room” with a cue: Detecting personality through spatial customization in a city simulation game. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.029 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Worth, N. C., & Book, A. S. (2014). Personality and behavior in a massively multiplayer online role-playing game. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Worth, N. C., & Book, A. S. (2015). Dimensions of video game behavior and their relationships with personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.056 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2010). Honesty-Humility and a person-situation interaction at work. European Journal of Personality, 24, 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.757 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar