Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

What Motivates Direct and Indirect Punishment?

Extending the “Intuitive Retributivism” Hypothesis

Published Online:February 25, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000455

Abstract

Abstract. Punishment represents a key mechanism to deter norm violations and is motivated by retribution and/or general deterrence. Retribution-motivated punishment is tailored to offense severity, whereas deterrence-motivated punishment is tailored to different factors, including punishment observability. This study aimed to replicate and extend prior work by testing how offense severity and punishment observability motivate direct, confrontational punishment versus indirect, covert punishment. Participants (N = 308) read vignettes describing offenses with varying severity (high vs. low) and punishment observability (high vs. low). We then assessed their punishment tendencies – overall, direct, and indirect – and their endorsement of retribution and deterrence motives. Findings supported a “strong version” of intuitive retributivism. Manipulating retribution-relevant information consistently influenced punishment: participants reported stronger overall, direct, and indirect punishment tendencies when severity was high (vs. low). Self-reported deterrence (but not retribution) motives positively related to overall, direct, and indirect punishment tendencies. However, manipulating deterrence-relevant information did not influence punishment.

References

  • Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Balafoutas, L., Nikiforakis, N., & Rockenbach, B. (2014). Direct and indirect punishment among strangers in the field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(45), 15924–15927. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1413170111 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Balafoutas, L., Nikiforakis, N., & Rockenbach, B. (2016). Altruistic punishment does not increase with the severity of norm violations in the field. Nature Communications, 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13327 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 594–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023489 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barclay, P. (2006). Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(5), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.01.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumard, N. (2010). Has punishment played a role in the evolution of cooperation? A critical review. Mind & Society, 9(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-010-0079-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumert, A., Halmburger, A., & Schmitt, M. (2013). Interventions against norm violations: Dispositional determinants of self-reported and real moral courage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490032 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: Gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 642–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405073 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boehm, C. (1993). Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Current Anthropology, 34(3), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/204166 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13(3), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90032-Y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001818 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carlsmith, K. M. (2006). The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Crockett, M. J., Özdemir, Y., & Fehr, E. (2014). The value of vengeance and the demand for deterrence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2279–2286. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). Mysteries of morality. Cognition, 112(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029065 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dores Cruz, T. D., Nieper, A., Testori, M., Martinescu, E., & Beersma, B. (2020). An integrative definition and framework to study gossip. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b8x57 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fan, L., Molho, C., Kupfer, T., & Tybur, J. M. (2020). Moral emotions and aggressive tactics in third-party punishment: The effect of welfare tradeoff ratio. Manuscript in preparation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02043 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25(3), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613510184 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gintis, H., Henrich, J., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2008). Strong reciprocity and the roots of human morality. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0067-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guala, F. (2012). Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000069 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D., & Ziker, J. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312(5781), 1767–1770. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127333 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hofmann, W., Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., Rockenbach, B., & Skitka, L. J. (2018). Moral punishment in everyday life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(12), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218775075 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hofmann, W., Wisneski, D. C., Brandt, M. J., & Skitka, L. J. (2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345(6202), 1340–1343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251560 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jordan, J. J., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Signaling when no one is watching: A reputation heuristics account of outrage and punishment in one-shot anonymous interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000186 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., Pedersen, E. J., & Tooby, J. (2012). What are punishment and reputation for? PLoS One, 7(9), Article e45662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045662 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krasnow, M. M., Delton, A. W., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2016). Looking under the hood of third-party punishment reveals design for personal benefit. Psychological Science, 27(3), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615624469 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., & O’Brien, E. (2007). Audience effects on moralistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.06.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leiner, D. J. (2019). Too fast, too straight, too weird: Non-reactive indicators for meaningless data in internet surveys. Survey Research Methods, 13(3), 229–248. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McKee, I. R., & Feather, N. T. (2008). Revenge, retribution, and values: social attitudes and punitive sentencing. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0066-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Molho, C., Tybur, J. M., Güler, E., Balliet, D., & Hofmann, W. (2017). Disgust and anger relate to different aggressive responses to moral violations. Psychological Science, 28(5), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617692000 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Molho, C., Tybur, J. M., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Balliet, D. (2020). Direct and indirect punishment of norm violations in daily life. Nature Communications, 11, Article 3432. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17286-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Molho, C., & Wu, J. (2021). Direct punishment and indirect reputation-based tactics to intervene against offences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), Article 20200289. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0289 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nikiforakis, N. (2008). Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pedersen, E. J., McAuliffe, W. H., Shah, Y., Tanaka, H., Ohtsubo, Y., & McCullough, M. E. (2019). When and why do third parties punish outside of the lab? A cross-cultural recall study. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(6), 846–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619884565 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Raihani, N. J., & Bshary, R. (2015). The reputation of punishers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Raihani, N. J., & Bshary, R. (2019). Punishment: One tool, many uses. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 1, Article e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.12 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–15078. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904312106 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Twardawski, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Thielmann, I. (2020). Punishment goals in classroom interventions: An attributional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000223 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Twardawski, M., Tang, K. T. Y., & Hilbig, B. E. (2020). Is it all about retribution? The flexibility of punishment goals. Social Justice Research, 33, 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-020-00352-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tybur, J. M., Molho, C., Çakmak, B., das Dores Cruz, T. D., Singh, G. D., & Zwicker, M. (2020). Disgust, anger, and aggression: Further tests of the equivalence of moral emotions. Collabra: Psychology, 6, 34. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.349 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2016). Gossip versus punishment: The efficiency of reputation to promote and maintain cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23919 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar